Skip to content

· Private foundation

Votum Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.7MReligion$3.1MInternational$3.0MArts & Culture$2.1MHuman Services$582kPhilanthropy$150kHealth$60kCrime & Legal$25k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARNER UNIVERSITY$250,000
OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$200,000
WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL$200,000
EQUIP LEADERSHIP INC$200,000
WORLD GOSPEL MISSION (WGM)$150,000
SALVATION ARMY$100,000
INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$100,000
ERSKINE COLLEGE$50,000
RADIO TRAINING NETWORK$45,000
MY MEDIC CHARITIES$25,000
CIRCLE OF FRIENDS$20,000
H-3 ADVENTURES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $1.5M → 17%WORLD WITNESS: $100k → 10%ERSKINE COLLEGE: $50k → 17%THE ASSOC FOR BIBLICAL HIGHER EDUCA: $78k → 13%TAMPA MUSLIM OUTREACH: $50k → 13%WARNER UNIVERSITY: $250k → 16%HIGHLANDS COLLEGE: $500k → 16%HARVEST PARTNERS: $250k → 5%INTERNATIONAL HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $72k → 13%SYLVA CHURCH OF GOD: $75k → 18%EQUIP LEADERSHIP INC: $300k → 13%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $400k → 19%OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $200k → 10%WHEATON COLLEGE: $1.0M → 7%FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $100k → 17%LILIAS TROTTER LEGACY: $450k → 10%TAMPA MUSLIM OUTREACH: $50k → 13%WARNER UNIVERSITY: $100k → 16%HARVEST PARTNERS: $100k → 5%EQUIP LEADERSHIP INC: $200k → 13%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $300k → 19%OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 10%WHEATON COLLEGE: $200k → 7%FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $100k → 17%TAMPA MUSLIM OUTREACH: $50k → 13%WARNER UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%HARVEST PARTNERS: $100k → 5%EQUIP LEADERSHIP INC: $100k → 13%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $250k → 19%WHEATON COLLEGE: $200k → 7%TAMPA MUSLIM OUTREACH: $50k → 13%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $50k → 16%HARVEST PARTNERS: $50k → 5%EQUIP MINISTRIES: $100k → 13%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $200k → 19%WHEATON COLLEGE: $132k → 7%TAMPA MUSLIM OUTREACH: $50k → 13%EQUIP LEADERSHIP INC: $100k → 13%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 19%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 19%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 19%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION (WGM): $150k → 19%LAKE WALES CARE CENTER: $160k → 16%LAKE WALES CARE CENTER: $115k → 16%LAKE WALES CARE CENTER: $75k → 16%LAKELAND CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $1.0M → 16%RADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
CA
UT
VA
KS
NC
SC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 16 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$11M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+31%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +62%
  • IW
    INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +22%
  • EL
    EQUIP Leadership Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $750k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIGHLANDS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • LT
    LILIAS TROTTER LEGACY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $450k · revenue -91% · 85% of their budget
  • EM
    EQUIP MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
2
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
3
Trinity Western University

Trinity Western University's mission is to produce positive, goal-oriented graduates with thoroughly Christian minds-growing disciples of Jesus Christ who glorify God through fulfilling the Great Commission, serving God and people in…

Education
4
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
5
Biola University Inc

Biola university is a private christian university located in southern california. for over 116 years, biola has stood out as an institution grounded on biblically centered education, intentional spiritual development, and career…

Education
6
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
7
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
8
University of Northwestern - St Paul

See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…

Education
9
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
10
The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago

Moody Bible Institute is a higher education and media ministry that exists to equip people with the truth of God's word to be maturing followers of Christ who are making disciples around the world. Moody is best known for its education…

Education
11
Great Commission University Inc

Gcu serves the global church by educating mission leaders to fulfill the great commission of jesus christ. gcu accomplishes this mission through a comprehensive program of biblical and general education, christ-centered service and…

Education
12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheaton College; the most unlike its peers is International Muslim Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKELAND CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $1,035,142 · OtherLAKELAND CHRISTIAN ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $990,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARNER UNIVERSITY: $550,000 · OtherWARNER UNIVERSITYHIGHLANDS COLLEGE: $500,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS COLLEGEHARVEST PARTNERS INC: $500,000 · OtherHARVEST PARTNERS INCLAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC: $350,000 · OtherLAKE WALES CARE CENTER INCSALVATION ARMY: $175,000 · Other+11 more: $646,277 · Other+11 moreWheaton College: $1,532,000 · EducationWheaton CollegeINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1,450,000 · EducationINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $390,000 · EducationOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY+5 more: $228,000 · Education+5 moreWorld Hope International Inc: $2,887,485 · InternationalWorld Hope Internation…FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,700,000 · Arts & CultureFELLOWSHIP FOR …INTERNATIONAL MUSLIM OUTREACH INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL M…EQUIP Leadership Inc: $750,000 · ReligionEQUIP Lead…LILIAS TROTTER LEGACY INC: $450,000 · ReligionLILIAS TRO…RADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC: $145,000 · ReligionRADIO TRAI…United Way of Central Florida Inc: $150,000 · PhilanthropyPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,746,579Education$3,600,000International$2,887,485Arts & Culture$2,000,000Religion$1,345,000Philanthropy$150,000Crime & Legal$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $2,887,485 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,700,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetWheaton College: $1,532,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1,450,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEQUIP Leadership Inc: $750,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLILIAS TROTTER LEGACY INC: $450,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $390,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC: $350,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MUSLIM OUTREACH INC: $300,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetUnited Way of Central Florida Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC: $145,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR BIBLICAL HIGHER EDUCATION: $78,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Hope International Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EQUIP Leadership Inc ↗
  • Who funds LILIAS TROTTER LEGACY INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MUSLIM OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds RADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR BIBLICAL HIGHER EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Erskine College and Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Duke Energy Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Votum Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Votum Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lake Wales Care Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Southern College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Votum’s filings →

More from the funding graph