Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Volo Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$25MEducation$9.7MHealth$5.7MInternational$4.1MHuman Services$3.7MScience & Tech$1.1MCommunity Improvement$1.1MHousing & Shelter$835kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $421k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+9 grants · $11M
$50,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$126M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND EDF$3,938,522
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKLEY FOUNDATION$1,463,271
CLEO INSTITUTE INC$1,321,749
DEPLOYUS$1,150,000
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$1,100,000
NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000,000
THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$336,000
AMPLIO NETWORK$300,000
SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS INC$275,000
PLACE OF HOPE$200,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$200,000
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$130,000
THE CLIMATE GROUP$125,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$105,000
H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CREATIVE PINELLAS INCORPORATED: $500 → 12%FOUNDATION FOR LOVE AND ACCEPTANCE: $3.0M → 4%SDG IMPACT FUND INC: $500 → 10%PROJECT PEACE LATIN AMERICA INC: $25k → 15%THINKTECH HAWAII INC: $35k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%THINKTECH HAWAII INC: $5k → 9%HOMELESS COALITION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $40k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $80k → 14%THINKTECH HAWAII INC: $5k → 9%THINKTECH HAWAII INC: $5k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $80k → 14%THINKTECH HAWAII INC: $5k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $76k → 14%BABY DJ: $1k → 13%IDEAS FOR US: $40k → 13%IDEAS FOR US: $13k → 13%IDEAS FOR US: $7k → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 14%PLACE OF HOPE: $200k → 11%IDEAS FOR US: $5k → 13%PLACE OF HOPE: $125k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $25k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $20k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $20k → 11%IDEAS FOR US: $4k → 13%GREEN CARD FOR KIDS INC: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Volo Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Volo Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45M · 81 repeat orgs$6.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

81 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
57

Total granted

$45M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+29%

Still filing today

74%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +202%
  • TC
    THE CLEO INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +287% · 62% of their budget
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR LOVE AND ACCEPTANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue -95% · 83% of their budget
  • SC
    SACHAMAMA CENTER FOR BIOLCULTURAL REGENERATION
    one grant, 2019 · $80k
  • TL
    TRAS LA PERLA USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $52k · revenue +52% · 49% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
4
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
7
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
8
Ocean First Institute

The mission of Ocean First Institute is ocean conservation through research and education. We work to deepen the natural connection between people and the ocean. We educate and empower people to understand the ocean is our life support…

Education
9
Climateworks Foundation

Climateworks foundation's mission is to connect philanthropy, grantees, and strategic partners to build and deliver high-impact climate solutions that benefit all people.

Science & Tech
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
My Green Lab

My green lab's mission is to build a culture of sustainability in science to transform the industry into a global leader on environmental sustainability. through education, community engagement, and leading-edge certification programs, we…

Environment
12
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tras La Perla Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …School District FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Community College Foundatio…Community Arts CentersAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyDance Arts OrganizationsFood Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%49%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/120
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,445

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/116
Grantees still filing
88/116
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $11,749,237 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDTHE CLEO INSTITUTE INC — $5,364,242 · EnvironmentTHE CLEO INSTITUTE INCNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,210,000 · EnvironmentDEPLOYUS INC — $1,150,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $935,000 · Environment+21 more — $2,304,663 · Environment+21 moreNICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $3,125,000 · OtherNICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUND…AMPLIO NETWORK — $2,700,000 · OtherAMPLIO NETWORKUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA — $2,625,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE AT THE KIMONIS LABORATORY — $782,745 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $690,000 · OtherJUST CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 · Other+65 more — $5,898,074 · Other+65 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $1,463,271 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,155,000 · EducationPresident and…PUNAHOU SCHOOL — $1,025,000 · EducationPUNAHOU SCHOO…Massachusetts Institute of Technology — $509,506 · EducationMassachusetts…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $430,112 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…THE KING'S ACADEMY INC — $340,000 · EducationTHE KING'S AC…FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $336,000 · EducationTHE BENJAMIN PRIVATE SCHOOL INC — $317,500 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $219,000 · Education+9 more — $525,600 · Education+9 moreFOUNDATION FOR LOVE AND ACCEPTANCE INC — $3,000,000 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INC — $390,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $361,000 · Human Services+8 more — $190,000 · Human ServicesTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $815,250 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $579,970 · HealthTHE UNLIMBITED FOUNDATION INC — $237,500 · HealthFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $152,500 · HealthTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC — $115,000 · Health+9 more — $165,550 · HealthSave The Children Federation Inc — $735,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc — $306,087 · InternationalTHE LELT FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 · InternationalBRAZIL FOUNDATION — $113,600 · International+1 more — $500 · InternationalSACHAMAMA INC — $431,100 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $235,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY TANK INC — $180,000 · PhilanthropyTHE METHUSELAH FOUNDATION — $125,000 · PhilanthropyTRAS LA PERLA USA INC — $52,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $45,000 · Philanthropy
Environment$22,713,142Other$16,570,819Education$6,320,989Human Services$3,941,000Health$2,065,770International$1,275,187Philanthropy$1,068,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $11,749,237 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CLEO INSTITUTE INC — $5,364,242 over 7y, 62% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOVE AND ACCEPTANCE INC — $3,000,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetAMPLIO NETWORK — $2,700,000 over 8y, 51% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $1,463,271 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,210,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDEPLOYUS INC — $1,150,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetPUNAHOU SCHOOL — $1,025,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $935,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $815,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUST CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $735,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $690,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $680,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $579,970 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $515,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $509,506 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSACHAMAMA INC — $431,100 over 4y, 32% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $430,112 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWATER PEOPLE THEATER GROUP NFP — $394,220 over 5y, 50% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC — $390,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT ALIANZA INC — $370,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $361,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC — $345,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KING'S ACADEMY INC — $340,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSolutions From The Land — $340,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $336,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $330,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BENJAMIN PRIVATE SCHOOL INC — $317,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $306,087 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $300,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $290,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $275,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNLIMBITED FOUNDATION INC — $237,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $235,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $219,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $199,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPY TANK INC — $180,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $175,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP — $175,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetResources for the Future Inc — $160,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CLIMATE GROUP INC — $156,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCox Science Center and Aquarium Inc — $152,700 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $152,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAIMANALO CANOE CLUB — $129,000 over 7y, 77% of budgetORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC — $127,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEO INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOVE AND ACCEPTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMPLIO NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds DEPLOYUS INC ↗
  • Who funds PUNAHOU SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JUST CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds SACHAMAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER PEOPLE THEATER GROUP NFP ↗
  • Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ALIANZA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Solutions From The Land ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE BENJAMIN PRIVATE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Energy …Community Foundation …The Energy FoundationEnvironmental Defense…The Dr P Phillips Fou…Allegany Franciscan M…Publix Super Markets …Elizabeth Morse Geniu…Universal Orlando Fou…Blue Cross Blue Shiel…The William & Flora H…Orlando Magic Youth F…
United States Energy FoundationCA28.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Energy Foundation · Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Elizabeth Morse Genius Foundation · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Orlando Magic Youth Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Volo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Ideas for Us Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc — 19% of income from government
  • The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Community Greening Corp — 5% of income from government
  • Orlando Science Centerinc — 4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Florida Next Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Bike Walk Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc — 0% of income from government
  • For Good Movement Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rethink Energy Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 153 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines