Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vogt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$30kHuman Services$30kFood & Nutrition$30kEnvironment$29kReligion$28kArts & Culture$27kAnimals$26kPhilanthropy$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$516k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY (HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN)$2,000
GOD'S KITCHEN (MEALS ON WHEELS)$2,000
SANTA CLAUS GIRLS$1,000
LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
CAMP BLODGETT$1,000
CAMPUS OUTREACH$1,000
LAND CONSERVANCY OF WEST MI$1,000
FEEDING AM WEST MI FOOD$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,000
MARY FREE BED FOUNDATION$1,000
HELEN DEVOS CHILDRENS HOSP$1,000
JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
LAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EQUINE RESCUE OF AIKEN: $2k → 17%CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $1k → 7%BREAD OF LIFE: $2k → 8%CAMP BLODGETT: $1k → 11%MACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FOR STUDENT SUPPORT: $2k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 21%LAKE FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $5k → 23%CAMPUS OUTREACH: $1k → 16%THE RIVER CC: $1k → 19%LAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%EQUINE RESCUE OF AIKEN: $2k → 17%CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $1k → 7%BREAD OF LIFE: $2k → 8%CAMP BLODGETT: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FOR STUDENT SUPPORT: $1k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1k → 14%BALDWIN CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $3k → 23%CAMPUS OUTREACH: $1k → 16%THE RIVER CC: $1k → 19%LAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%EQUINE RESCUE OF AIKEN: $1k → 17%CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $1k → 7%BREAD OF LIFE: $2k → 8%LAKE FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $2k → 23%VA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $2k → 9%BALDWIN CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $2k → 23%VA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $2k → 9%LAKE FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $2k → 23%VA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $2k → 9%EQUINE RESCUE: $2k → 14%GOD'S KITCHEN (MEALS ON WHEELS): $2k → 11%UNITED WAY (HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN): $2k → 11%UNITED WAY (HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN): $2k → 11%UNITED WAY (HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN): $2k → 11%HELEN DEVOS CHILDRENS HOSP: $2k → 11%UNITED WAY (HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN): $2k → 11%GOD'S KITCHEN (MEALS ON WHEELS): $2k → 11%UNITED WAY (HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN): $2k → 11%GOD'S KITCHEN (MEALS ON WHEELS): $2k → 11%MARY FREE BED FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%GOD'S KITCHEN (MEALS ON WHEELS): $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
VA
TN
SC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 44 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
6

Total granted

$256k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+47%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +35%
  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +16%
  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • ER
    EQUINE RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • TT
    TALL TURF MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -38%
  • WR
    World Renewgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
3
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
4
Western Reserve Land Conservancy

Land conservation and restoration for public benefit

Environment
5
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
6
Six Rivers Land Conservancy Fka Six Rivers Regional Land Conservancy

To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special

Environment
7
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy

The mission of gtrlc is to protect significant natural, scenic and farm lands and advance land stewardship now and for future generations.

Environment
8
West Shore Wildlife Center

To inspire coexistence between humans and wildlife.

Animals
9
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
10
Chippewa Watershed Conservancy Inc

To protect and restore central michigan's land, water, and wildlife resources to improve the quality of life for all.

Environment
11
West Michigan Environmental Action Council Educational Foundation

Wmeac's mission is to "inform and engage an inclusive community which acts together to protect natural resources and create a climate resilient west michigan."

—
12
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOD'S KITCHEN (MEALS ON WHEELS): $9,500 · OtherLAND CONSERVANCY OF WEST MI: $9,000 · OtherCOLDWATER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $9,000 · OtherBREAD OF LIFE: $9,000 · OtherVA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $9,000 · OtherCONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $9,000 · OtherBALDWIN CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherMARY FREE BED FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $7,500 · OtherFEEDING AM WEST MI FOOD: $7,500 · OtherLAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY: $7,000 · OtherCAMPUS OUTREACH: $6,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $6,500 · OtherHELEN DEVOS CHILDRENS HOSP: $6,500 · OtherCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $7,000 · Other+22 more: $53,000 · Other+22 moreHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $14,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF …THE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LAKE …EQUINE RESCUE OF AIKEN: $9,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN: $5,000 · AnimalsHARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,500 · AnimalsKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Food & NutritionINDIAN TRAILS CAMP: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP BLODGETT: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsTALL TURF MINISTRIES: $500 · Recreation & SportsHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationAYLETT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationLAKE FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $9,500 · Religion
Other$193,500Philanthropy$23,000Animals$18,500Food & Nutrition$12,500Recreation & Sports$12,000Education$10,000Religion$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $9,500 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEQUINE RESCUE OF AIKEN: $9,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN TRAILS CAMP: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM: $5,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP BLODGETT: $5,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAYLETT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTALL TURF MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Renew: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE REHAB CENTER LTD: $500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUINE RESCUE OF AIKEN ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN TRAILS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CAMP BLODGETT ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Brown Tassell Foundation · James and Shirley Balk Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vogt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vogt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vogt Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vogt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vogt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph