Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vista Hermosa Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
86
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$318k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$27MCivil Rights$4.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.1MCommunity Improvement$2.1MFood & Nutrition$2.0MHealth$1.8MReligion$1.5MPhilanthropy$874kOther$0
02FY2024 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $382k
  • $50k–250k48 grants · $4.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $942k
$58,167
Median grant
14
States reached
$175M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$317,595
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$313,867
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$310,873
SONJE AYITI ORGANIZATION INC$206,317
BEYOND BORDERS INC$200,000
CAPABLE$200,000
KUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN$200,000
WORLD VISION$200,000
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM$200,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC$197,000
ASOCIACION MEXICANA DE TRANSFORMACION RURAL Y URBANA$153,474
WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS$150,735
GRAVIS USA$149,000
WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS$133,649
NOMI NETWORK$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($41M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($4.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $469k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRAVIS USA: $149k → 8%GRAVIS USA: $136k → 8%FAMILY LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 11%GRAVIS USA: $136k → 8%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%GRAVIS USA: $13k → 8%FAMILY LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 11%GRAVIS USA: $5k → 8%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%GRAVIS USA: $5k → 8%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $250 → 11%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $3k → 14%BORDER ANGELS: $3k → 11%CAMP KESEM: $3k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($4.9M)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$2.8M · 65 grants
India$690k · 11 grants
Haiti$668k · 8 grants
Uganda$580k · 10 grants
Kenya$126k · 2 grants
Costa Rica$50k · 2 grants
Puerto Rico$40k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Vista Hermosa Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 8%.

Vista Hermosa Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 30% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 79 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

79 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
78

Total granted

$26M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+15%

Still filing today

54%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +214%
  • BB
    BEYOND BORDERS INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +34%
  • KF
    KUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $917k · revenue +115% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • SP
    Sonoran Pacific Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $11M · revenue -98%
  • HD
    HAITI DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $329k
  • WF
    WSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
5
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
6
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
7
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
8
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
9
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
10
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us; the most unlike its peers is Baja Animal Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/92
Grantees still filing
56/92
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $2,809,761 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM: $2,000,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUMSojourners Inc: $1,201,000 · OtherSojourners IncAMEXTRA (ASOCIACION MEXICANA DE TRANSFORMACION RURAL Y URBANA AC): $850,398 · Other+121 more: $9,459,475 · Other+121 moreWORLD VISION INC: $4,945,359 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,706,202 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOC…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $1,452,300 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A…BEYOND BORDERS INC: $1,148,000 · InternationalBEYOND BORDERS INCGroundswell International Inc: $916,383 · InternationalGroundswell International IncCAPABLE: $847,000 · InternationalCAPABLEFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $767,518 · InternationalFLORESTA USA INCORPORATEDHEAD FIRST DEVELOPMENT: $510,946 · International+17 more: $1,912,734 · International+17 moreSonoran Pacific Foundation Inc: $11,401,563 · ReligionSonoran Pacific Foundation I…+2 more: $100,000 · ReligionBoston Foundation Inc: $585,000 · PhilanthropyMINISTRY OFFICE: $413,000 · PhilanthropyEl Pozo de Vida: $169,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF JITOKEZE INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $48,761 · PhilanthropyKUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN: $917,265 · EducationSUSTAINABLE ACTION INTERNATIONAL: $260,000 · Education+7 more: $20,598 · EducationNOMI NETWORK INC: $495,750 · Crime & LegalLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $261,972 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $355 · Crime & LegalGravis USA: $444,194 · Human Services+4 more: $24,698 · Human Services
Other$16,320,634International$14,206,442Religion$11,501,563Philanthropy$1,265,761Education$1,197,863Crime & Legal$758,077Human Services$468,892

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $4,945,359 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM: $2,000,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,706,202 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $1,452,300 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSojourners Inc: $1,201,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetBEYOND BORDERS INC: $1,148,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetKUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN: $917,265 over 7y, 27% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $916,383 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetCAPABLE: $847,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $767,518 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $585,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEAD FIRST DEVELOPMENT: $510,946 over 4y, 48% of budgetNOMI NETWORK INC: $495,750 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetWorld Renew: $445,300 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGravis USA: $444,194 over 4y, 93% of budgetMINISTRY OFFICE: $413,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $403,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL GRASSROOTS: $289,195 over 5y, 91% of budgetOASIS MINISTRIES: $278,759 over 4y, 87% of budgetURBAN MOSAIC INC: $270,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $261,972 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetSUSTAINABLE ACTION INTERNATIONAL: $260,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetSPARK MICROGRANTS INC: $252,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSonje Ayiti Organization Inc: $233,112 over 1y, 48% of budgetHaiti Partners Inc: $233,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetMWANZO: $200,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetNew Roots Haiti: $200,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetEl Pozo de Vida: $169,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetRECREATION PROJECT: $148,500 over 4y, 51% of budgetThe Chain Collaborative: $135,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITIES ORGANIZING FOR HAITIAN ENGAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT: $130,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetSATYANA INSTITUTE: $124,672 over 3y, 36% of budgetFrontier Behavioral Health: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $99,952 over 1y, 16% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTH ASIA ACCESS: $80,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetRedeem International: $75,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $55,238 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JITOKEZE INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetCARE OF CREATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetGROWING HOPE GLOBALLY: $43,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetABARA INC: $40,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCIUDAD NUEVA COMMUNITY OUTREACH IN: $40,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSCHOOL OF CHOICE EDUCATION ORGANIZATION: $30,011 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sonoran Pacific Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell International Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPABLE ↗
  • Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEAD FIRST DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds World Renew ↗
  • Who funds Gravis USA ↗
  • Who funds MINISTRY OFFICE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GRASSROOTS ↗
  • Who funds OASIS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds AMEXTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN MOSAIC INC ↗
  • Who funds LET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE ACTION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SPARK MICROGRANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Sonje Ayiti Organization Inc ↗
  • Who funds Haiti Partners Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jubilee FoundationWA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jubilee Foundation · Novo Foundation · Imago Dei Fund · Seattle Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Dunn Family Charitable Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · World Vision Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Inatai Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vista Hermosa Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vista Hermosa Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • Lawyers Without Borders Inc: 69% of income from government
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vista Hermosa Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Vista Hermosa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 177 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vista Hermosa’s filings →

More from the funding graph