Skip to content

· Public charity

Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation

Using innovative technology, we strive to create a world in which donors can easily support impactful charitable organizations all over the world with the click of a button.moreover, we promote opportunities for individuals and companies to engage in meaningful interactions with nonprofits that elevate awareness, understanding, and…

$818k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$138k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$245kYouth Development$205kEducation$126kPhilanthropy$122kEnvironment$70kHuman Services$67kArts & Culture$56kInternational$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $590,429, the rows itemized in this filing. The $817,567 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $227,138 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $319k
$11,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$615k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HELPING$138,023
HAPPY HOPE FOUNDATION$101,777
HBCU HEROES$78,750
BIKES FOR GOODNESS SAKE$33,826
PLANET BEE FOUNDATION$32,000
QUEST INC$22,868
REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS (ROCK)$21,500
LEARNING ALLY$15,300
RISE AGAINST HUNGER$12,500
GIRLSTART$12,500
ZENO MATH POWERED$11,500
GIRLS EMPOWERMENT NETWORK$11,000
PLANTING PEOPLE GROWING JUSTICE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$11,000
KIDS IN TECHNOLOGY INC$10,400
ACCEL$9,057
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $6k → 11%BIKES FOR GOODNESS SAKE: $34k → 6%QUEST INC: $23k → 13%LEARNING ALLY: $15k → 11%BIKES FOR GOODNESS SAKE: $6k → 6%PLAY FOR PEACE: $6k → 14%GLAMOURGALS: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Visit Org Philanthropic Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$682k · 14 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$682k
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Project Helping
    2× · 2023–2024 · $206k · revenue +7%
  • FN
    Flight Nine Academy
    2× · 2023–2024 · $116k · revenue +249% · 47% of their budget
  • BF
    Bikes for Goodness Sake
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +212%

Funded once

  • B2
    BACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $39k · revenue -32%
  • CM
    CREATIVE MINDS NYC INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +8%
  • OI
    OUTREACH360 INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Kids Inc

Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.

Youth Development
2
Project Invent

Project Invent empowers students with the 21st-century skills to succeed individually and impact globally, through invention for social good.

Science & Tech
3
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
4
Student Global Ambassador Project

SGAP Leaders empowers teens to become agents of change in their communities and beyond by thinking critically, applying STEM, and championing social impact. Our students 1) brainstorm about projects that they would like to lead (all…

Education
5
Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.

Education
6
Building Bridges Education

Building Bridges Education (BBE) is a non-profit organization at the forefront of creating transformative, high-impact programming. BBE is committed to equity-driven initiatives that empower students to embark on journeys of…

Education
7
EcoRise Youth Innovations

Ecorise Youth Innovations inspires a new generation of leaders to design a sustainable future for all. Our school-based programs empower youth to tackle real-world challenges in their schools and communities by teaching sustainability,…

Environment
8
Stem Kids Nyc

To bridge the gap between the current school curriculum and the immediate need for schools to prepare students for STEM skills and for jobs that do not yet exist.

Education
9
Big Thought

The mission of Big Thought is to make imagination a part of everyday learning. We bring relentless optimism, innovation, and imagination to the biggest problem facing education today: the opportunity gap.

Arts & Culture
10
Accelerate4KIDS Foundation

To make Digital Literacy and STEM Education accessible and equitable to K12 youth in under-resourced communities so they too can live a life of opportunities and prosperity.

Education
11
Gratitude Global

Working through social entrepreneurs to impact the lives of children globally. the gratitude network seeks out the worlds most dynamic and innovative leaders and organizations impacting the lives of children and youth for competitive…

Philanthropy
12
InPlay Learning Network

InPlay connects kids and youth to out-of-school learning activities that ignite their individual interests and talents. We are a non-profit that works with parents, school districts, activity providers, and other partners to connect…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Creative Minds Nyc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Flight Nine Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
22/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Project Helping: $205,914 · HealthProject HelpingFlight Nine Academy: $115,500 · Youth DevelopmentFlight Nine AcademyBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $38,967 · Youth DevelopmentBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERI…RAINBOW LABS MENTORING INC: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentRAINBOW LABS MENTOR…Bikes for Goodness Sake: $39,510 · Human ServicesBikes for Good…GENAUSTIN: $29,050 · Human ServicesGENAUSTINLIFE CONCEPTS INC: $22,868 · Human ServicesLIFE CONCEPTS …Learning Ally Inc: $15,300 · Human ServicesLearning Ally …GLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesGLAMOURGALS FO…PLAY FOR PEACE: $6,000 · Human ServicesAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesHappy Hope Foundation Inc: $121,957 · PhilanthropyHappy Hope Fo…REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS: $28,000 · EducationREAL OPTIO…ACCEL: $17,057 · EducationACCELSUITUP INCORPORATED: $15,000 · EducationSUITUP INC…Zeno: $11,500 · EducationZenoKIDS IN TECHNOLOGY: $10,400 · EducationKIDS IN TE…PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $6,100 · EducationPERKINS SC…SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC: $5,500 · EducationSCIENCE IS…CREATIVE MINDS NYC INC: $29,650 · Arts & CultureDRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR NYC LTD: $10,450 · Arts & CultureCREATIVETS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $6,371 · Arts & CultureTOGETHER WE RISE: $18,823 · Recreation & SportsGIRLSTART: $18,500 · Recreation & SportsURBAN YOGA FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 · Recreation & SportsCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $15,400 · OtherCOUNCIL ON THE ENV…Friends of SCRAP Inc: $15,000 · OtherFriends of SCRAP I…SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $20,625 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MEDI…RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $12,500 · OtherRISE AGAINST HUNGE…PLANET BEE FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherPLANET BEE FOUNDAT…OUTREACH360 INC: $15,000 · OtherOUTREACH360 INCPLANNED TO A T INC: $6,500 · OtherTHRIVING FORWARD PROJECT: $6,000 · OtherPlanting people growing justice leadership institute: $18,500 · OtherPlanting people gr…EQUALITY FEDERATION: $7,500 · OtherWags and Walks: $6,500 · Other
Health$205,914Youth Development$171,467Human Services$126,728Philanthropy$121,957Education$93,557Arts & Culture$56,471Recreation & Sports$53,823Other$163,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Helping: $205,914 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetHappy Hope Foundation Inc: $121,957 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetFlight Nine Academy: $115,500 over 2y, 47% of budgetBikes for Goodness Sake: $39,510 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $38,967 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPLANET BEE FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCREATIVE MINDS NYC INC: $29,650 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGENAUSTIN: $29,050 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetREAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS: $28,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLIFE CONCEPTS INC: $22,868 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $20,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $18,823 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLSTART: $18,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPlanting people growing justice leadership institute: $18,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetACCEL: $17,057 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW LABS MENTORING INC: $17,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetURBAN YOGA FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $15,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $15,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of SCRAP Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSUITUP INCORPORATED: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZeno: $11,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR NYC LTD: $10,450 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetKIDS IN TECHNOLOGY: $10,400 over 1y, 16% of budgetCREATIVETS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUALITY FEDERATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWags and Walks: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED TO A T INC: $6,500 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $6,371 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $6,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PEACE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Givinga Foundation Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Visit Org Philanthropic’s filings →

More from the funding graph