· Public charity
Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation
Using innovative technology, we strive to create a world in which donors can easily support impactful charitable organizations all over the world with the click of a button.moreover, we promote opportunities for individuals and companies to engage in meaningful interactions with nonprofits that elevate awareness, understanding, and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $590,429 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $817,567 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $227,138 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $194k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $319k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT HELPING | $138,023 |
| HAPPY HOPE FOUNDATION | $101,777 |
| HBCU HEROES | $78,750 |
| BIKES FOR GOODNESS SAKE | $33,826 |
| PLANET BEE FOUNDATION | $32,000 |
| QUEST INC | $22,868 |
| REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS (ROCK) | $21,500 |
| LEARNING ALLY | $15,300 |
| RISE AGAINST HUNGER | $12,500 |
| GIRLSTART | $12,500 |
| ZENO MATH POWERED | $11,500 |
| GIRLS EMPOWERMENT NETWORK | $11,000 |
| PLANTING PEOPLE GROWING JUSTICE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE | $11,000 |
| KIDS IN TECHNOLOGY INC | $10,400 |
| ACCEL | $9,057 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHProject Helping2× · 2023–2024 · $206k · revenue +7%
- FNFlight Nine Academy2× · 2023–2024 · $116k · revenue +249% · 47% of their budget
- BFBikes for Goodness Sake2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +212%
Funded once
- B2BACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $39k · revenue -32%
- CMCREATIVE MINDS NYC INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +8%
- FOFriends of SCRAP Incone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.
Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.
Project Invent empowers students with the 21st-century skills to succeed individually and impact globally, through invention for social good.
Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.
SGAP Leaders empowers teens to become agents of change in their communities and beyond by thinking critically, applying STEM, and championing social impact. Our students 1) brainstorm about projects that they would like to lead (all…
Building Bridges Education (BBE) is a non-profit organization at the forefront of creating transformative, high-impact programming. BBE is committed to equity-driven initiatives that empower students to embark on journeys of…
Ecorise Youth Innovations inspires a new generation of leaders to design a sustainable future for all. Our school-based programs empower youth to tackle real-world challenges in their schools and communities by teaching sustainability,…
To bridge the gap between the current school curriculum and the immediate need for schools to prepare students for STEM skills and for jobs that do not yet exist.
InPlay connects kids and youth to out-of-school learning activities that ignite their individual interests and talents. We are a non-profit that works with parents, school districts, activity providers, and other partners to connect…
The mission of Big Thought is to make imagination a part of everyday learning. We bring relentless optimism, innovation, and imagination to the biggest problem facing education today: the opportunity gap.
Working through social entrepreneurs to impact the lives of children globally. the gratitude network seeks out the worlds most dynamic and innovative leaders and organizations impacting the lives of children and youth for competitive…
The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Creative Minds Nyc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Flight Nine Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Project Helping ↗
- Who funds Happy Hope Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Flight Nine Academy ↗
- Who funds Bikes for Goodness Sake ↗
- Who funds BACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA ↗
- Who funds PLANET BEE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE MINDS NYC INC ↗
- Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
- Who funds REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS ↗
- Who funds LIFE CONCEPTS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
- Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
- Who funds Planting people growing justice leadership institute ↗
- Who funds ACCEL ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW LABS MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN YOGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends of SCRAP Inc ↗
- Who funds SUITUP INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH360 INC ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds Zeno ↗
- Who funds DRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR NYC LTD ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds CREATIVETS ↗
- Who funds GLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED TO A T INC ↗
- Who funds Wags and Walks ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds PLAY FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds APPETITE FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Givinga Foundation Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.