Skip to content
Visionary Women at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Visionary Women

To engage conversations with innovative leaders funding high impact initiatives for women and girls.

$738k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$670kArts & Culture$475kInternational$330kEducation$294kCommunity Improvement$250kHealth$210kHousing & Shelter$185kCivil Rights$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $600,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $737,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $137,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k24 grants · $450k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$775k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOM'S FIRST LOCKBOX$100,000
THE FAMILY PLACE$50,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$40,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$40,000
ALEX MORGAN FOUNDATION$40,000
ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$25,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC$20,000
EBELL FRIENDS$20,000
ARTWORXLA$20,000
THE MIDNIGHT MISSION$20,000
COALITION FOR ENGAGED EDUCATION$20,000
AVIVA FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES$15,000
EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES$15,000
CENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $824k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WISEPLACE: $5k → 10%THE FAMILY PLACE: $50k → 14%SHESHOULDRUN: $10k → 14%EMPOWERED NETWORK: $15k → 9%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $15k → 7%LAURA'S HOUSE: $15k → 10%PROJECT GLIMMER: $15k → 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%AFYA FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%MOM'S FIRST LOCKBOX: $100k → 17%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 14%MOM'S FIRST: $20k → 17%MOM'S FIRST: $10k → 17%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 14%JACARANDA FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%HARVEST HOME: $20k → 14%WOMENONE: $10k → 17%HARVEST HOME: $10k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $10k → 14%A SENSE OF HOME: $20k → 14%OPCC: $8k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $30k → 14%JENESSE CENTER: $10k → 14%JENESSE CENTER: $10k → 14%SPECIAL NEEDS NETWORK: $25k → 14%SANCTUARY OF HOPE: $15k → 14%FREEFROM: $15k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $20k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $15k → 14%ALEX MORGAN FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $15k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION DBA FUND OF WPHF: $10k → 14%FEEDLOVE LA: $5k → 14%SOJOURN: $5k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $24k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $30k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $20k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $5k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION WOMEN'S CRISIS & BRIDGE HOUSING: $5k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Visionary Women’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 58%.

Visionary Womenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 39 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
85

Total granted

$1.6M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+5%

Still filing today

95%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $130k · revenue +5%
  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +66%
  • CS
    CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BG
    BLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +2%
  • WF
    Women for Afghan Women Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -61%
  • MH
    MLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -73% · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
Young Women's Freedom Center

The core mission of the young women's freedom center is to inspire and empower young women who have been involved in the juvenile justice system, criminal justice system, and/or the underground street economy to create a positive change in…

Human Services
3
Women's Foundation of California

Women's foundation of california amplifies the voices and experiences of community leaders, redistributes knowledge, power, and resources, and mobilizes communities and funders to advance justice for all.

—
4
UltraViolet Education Fund

Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…

Civil Rights
5
Girl Effect Inc

Girl effect works for a future in which every girl is in control of her body, her health, her learning and her livelihood. we work across africa and asia with adolescent girls and young women using the power of media and technology to…

Youth Development
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
She's the First Inc

She's the first (stf) teams up with grassroots leaders to make sure girls everywhere are educated, respected, and heard. our vision is a world where every girl can choose her own future.

Human Services
8
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
9
The Archer School for Girls Inc

The archer school for girls is an educational community that supports and challenges young women to discover their passions and realize their true potential by a) providing a rigorous, integrated college preparatory curriculum that fosters…

Education
10
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
11
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
12
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wize Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

147 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
143/147
Grantees still filing
91/147
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INCProyecto Pastoral: $60,000 · Human ServicesProyecto PastoralEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONThe Family Place: $50,000 · Human ServicesThe Family PlaceDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $45,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTERHarvest Home Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $32,500 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $29,500 · Human Services+22 more: $351,700 · Human Services+22 moreNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $110,000 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTERCHRYSALIS CENTER: $53,000 · OtherCHRYSALIS CENTEREQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES: $35,000 · OtherCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $65,000 · OtherCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INCLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+43 more: $635,000 · Other+43 moreARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER M…STREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureSTREET SYMPHONY…THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF C…EBELL FRIENDS: $40,000 · Arts & CultureEBELL FRIENDSSTEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSTEP UP WOMEN'S…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIAT…LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES COU…GLOBAL GIRL MEDIA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureGLORIA'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSundance Institute: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $68,000 · Arts & Culture+7 moreCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA …ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 · EducationALLIANCE CO…Coalition for Engaged Education: $30,000 · EducationCoalition f…Girls With Impact Inc: $25,000 · EducationGirls With …THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY…ISHA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationISHA FOUNDA…DEFY VENTURES INC: $15,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationHAMBURGER HOME: $15,000 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,500 · EducationASSOCIATED STUDENTS INC CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON: $11,000 · Education+4 more: $35,000 · Education+4 moreVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $70,000 · InternationalVITAL VOIC…INDEGO AFRICA PROJECT: $63,000 · InternationalINDEGO AFR…Women for Afghan Women Inc: $60,000 · InternationalWomen for …JUST LIKE MY CHILD FOUNDATION: $37,500 · InternationalJUST LIKE …HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $25,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGH…ACUMEN FUND INC: $20,000 · InternationalACUMEN FUN…THE VOICES PROJECT USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalWomens Voices Now Inc: $10,000 · InternationalBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Community ImprovementMLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 · Community ImprovementWhy Not Prosper Inc: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSUMMAEVERYTHANG COMMUNITY CENTER IN: $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementFREE THE WORK: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $15,000 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $10,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $40,000 · HealthWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $35,000 · HealthOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc: $35,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 · HealthCenter for Restorative Justice Works: $25,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE LALTOT INSTITUTE DBA THE ONSITE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthMAKE GOOD INC: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · Health
Human Services$823,700Other$938,000Arts & Culture$438,000Education$323,500International$295,500Community Improvement$225,000Health$220,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetINDEGO AFRICA PROJECT: $63,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetProyecto Pastoral: $60,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $55,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER: $53,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEBELL FRIENDS: $40,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUST LIKE MY CHILD FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetEQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $32,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIY GIRLS: $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCoalition for Engaged Education: $30,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSpecial Needs Network Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJACARANDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetWhy Not Prosper Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIZE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVELOVE: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCenter for Restorative Justice Works: $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…The Ahmanson Foundati…Weingart FoundationCalifornia Community …The Annenberg Foundat…The Rose Hills Founda…Liberty Hill Foundati…The California Wellne…Jewish Community Foun…Conrad N Hilton Found…S Mark Taper Foundati…The Green Foundation
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA60.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Visionary Women funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Visionary Women. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • You Are More Than Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Empower Her Network Inc Dba Empowered Network: 47% of income from government
  • National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 141 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Visionary Women’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home