Skip to content
Vision y Compromiso at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Vision y Compromiso

VISION Y COMPROMISO's mission is to promote community well being by supporting promotoras and community health workers as viable community assets and as agents critical to social change.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Human Services$98kHealth$53kCommunity Improvement$30kCivil Rights$24kInternational$16kEducation$11kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $216,220, the rows itemized in this filing. The $234,946 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,726 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $158k
$7,865
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DE COLORES RESOURCE CENTER INC$30,000
PUERTAS ABIERTAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$25,000
LA WOMAN INC$25,000
HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY(HOPE)$16,000
EL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY$15,000
CORAZON Y CARACTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$11,507
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,453
GREENFIELD WALKING GROUP$10,000
LATINA COALITION SILICON VALLEY$7,865
PROYECTO PASTORAL$5,220
DOLORES HUERTA FOUNDATION$5,175
KAU RURAL HEALTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
PROMOTORES HOPE NETWORK LLC$5,000
CAMPESINAS UNIDAS DEL VALLE DE SAN JOAQUIN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $5k → 10%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $5k → 14%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latinas Usa
Community Improvement
2
Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno

Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.

International
3
Latino Political Network
—
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
Cultiva La Salud

Cultiva La Salud is dedicated to creating health equity in the San Joaquin Valley by fostering changes in communities that support healthy eating and active living. Cultiva La Salud is among a growing number of programs in the nation who…

Health
6
Vuela for Health

Vuelas mission is to unite and engage Latino communities through education, collaboration, and leadership development, to improve the physical, mental, social, and emotional well-being of participants and their families.

Community Improvement
7
Herencia Hispana San Diego

Unite all latino americans

Membership Benefit
8
United Latino Fund

United latinx fund is los angeles' leading foundation and philanthropic resource created for and by latinx that transforms, uplifts and improves our community's quality of life. with generous support from workplace giving campaigns, united…

Human Services
9
Instituto De Educacion Popular Del Sur De California

strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools

Unclassified
10
Dolores Huerta Action Fund

DHAF mission is to empower historically disenfranchised communities to activate voters, influence elections, shape policy, and achieve fair political representation in local, state, and federal government.

Civil Rights
11
Mujeres Unidas y Activas

MUAis an organization of Latina and Indigenous immigrant women with the mission of growing our personal and community power to achieve social and economic justice. Personal transformation and civic-political participation go hand in hand.

Human Services
12
Latino Leadership Council Inc

To advance the wellness and leadership capacity of Latino populations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dolores C Huerta Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Greenfield Walking Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
9/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DE COLORES RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30,000 · OtherDE COLORES RESOURCE CENTER INCLA WOMAN INC: $25,000 · OtherLA WOMAN INCEL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherEL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $11,507 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCentro La Familia Advocacy Services INC: $7,594 · OtherCentro La Familia Advocacy Services INCHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $7,500 · OtherCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5,075 · OtherPROMOTORES HOPE NETWORK LLC: $5,000 · OtherFAMILIES USA ACTION: $5,000 · OtherTime For Change Foundation: $5,000 · OtherGREENFIELD WALKING GROUP: $10,000 · OtherGREENFIELD WALKING GROUPDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $5,175 · OtherNATUN GUATEMALA: $5,160 · OtherESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,000 · OtherPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $25,000 · HealthPuertas Abierta…KAU RURAL HEALTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthKAU RURAL HEALT…DIA DE LA MUJER LATINA INC: $5,000 · HealthDIA DE LA MUJER…CORAZON Y CARACTER: $15,000 · Public BenefitCORAZON Y…Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley: $7,865 · Public BenefitLatina Co…INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,453 · PhilanthropyCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyMANA DE SAN DIEGO: $11,075 · EducationCAMPESINAS UNIDAS DEL VALLE DE SAN: $5,000 · EducationHISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA: $16,000 · Civil RightsGive For A Smile: $10,400 · Human ServicesProyecto Pastoral: $5,220 · Human Services
Other$142,011Health$35,000Public Benefit$22,865Philanthropy$16,453Education$16,075Civil Rights$16,000Human Services$15,620

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMANA DE SAN DIEGO: $11,075 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,453 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGive For A Smile: $10,400 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetGREENFIELD WALKING GROUP: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLatina Coalition of Silicon Valley: $7,865 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCentro La Familia Advocacy Services INC: $7,594 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProyecto Pastoral: $5,220 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATUN GUATEMALA: $5,160 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5,075 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPESINAS UNIDAS DEL VALLE DE SAN: $5,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetKAU RURAL HEALTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIA DE LA MUJER LATINA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The James Irvine Foun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Wellne…Silicon Valley Commun…Latino Community Foun…Women's Foundation of…The California Endowm…The San Francisco Fou…Sierra Health Foundat…Liberty Hill Foundati…Weingart FoundationSempra Foundation
The James Irvine FoundationCA19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · Women's Foundation of California · The California Endowment · The San Francisco Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vision y Compromiso funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vision y Compromiso. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vision y Compromiso?

Find your warmest path to Vision y Compromiso through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vision y Compromiso’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home