· Public charity
Vision y Compromiso
VISION Y COMPROMISO's mission is to promote community well being by supporting promotoras and community health workers as viable community assets and as agents critical to social change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $216,220 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $234,946 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,726 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $158k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DE COLORES RESOURCE CENTER INC | $30,000 |
| PUERTAS ABIERTAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER | $25,000 |
| LA WOMAN INC | $25,000 |
| HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY(HOPE) | $16,000 |
| CORAZON Y CARACTER | $15,000 |
| EL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,507 |
| INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,453 |
| GREENFIELD WALKING GROUP | $10,000 |
| LATINA COALITION SILICON VALLEY | $7,865 |
| PROYECTO PASTORAL | $5,220 |
| DOLORES HUERTA FOUNDATION | $5,175 |
| GIVE FOR A SMILE | $5,000 |
| DIA DE LA MUJER INC | $5,000 |
| FAMILIES USA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.
Cultiva La Salud is dedicated to creating health equity in the San Joaquin Valley by fostering changes in communities that support healthy eating and active living. Cultiva La Salud is among a growing number of programs in the nation who…
Unite all latino americans
Vuelas mission is to unite and engage Latino communities through education, collaboration, and leadership development, to improve the physical, mental, social, and emotional well-being of participants and their families.
United latinx fund is los angeles' leading foundation and philanthropic resource created for and by latinx that transforms, uplifts and improves our community's quality of life. with generous support from workplace giving campaigns, united…
strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools
To advance the wellness and leadership capacity of Latino populations.
DHAF mission is to empower historically disenfranchised communities to activate voters, influence elections, shape policy, and achieve fair political representation in local, state, and federal government.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dolores C Huerta Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Greenfield Walking Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Puertas Abiertas Community Resource Center ↗
- Who funds HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds EL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CORAZON Y CARACTER ↗
- Who funds MANA DE SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Give For A Smile ↗
- Who funds GREENFIELD WALKING GROUP ↗
- Who funds Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley ↗
- Who funds Centro La Familia Advocacy Services INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Proyecto Pastoral ↗
- Who funds DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATUN GUATEMALA ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds DIA DE LA MUJER LATINA INC ↗
- Who funds CAMPESINAS UNIDAS DEL VALLE DE SAN ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES USA ACTION ↗
- Who funds Time For Change Foundation ↗
- Who funds KAU RURAL HEALTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · Women's Foundation of California · The California Endowment · The San Francisco Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vision y Compromiso funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Vision y Compromiso?
Find your warmest path to Vision y Compromiso through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.