Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Virginia Lopez Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2018
15
Grants FY2018
8
States reached
$116k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of Virginia Lopez Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Virginia Lopez Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $161k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
17
11
18
1
19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Philanthropy$846kEducation$286kHealth$31kRecreation & Sports$21kCrime & Legal$12kArts & Culture$10kPublic Benefit$10kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2018 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k11 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $116k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST HARLEM SCHOOL AT EXODUS HOUSE$115,700
Individual grant recipient$10,000
RUMSEY HALL SCHOOL$10,000
SOLVE MECFS INITIATIVE$10,000
DARTMOUTH$5,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$3,090
COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
EDUCATION OUTSIDE$1,000
AMERICAN CIVL LIBERTIES UNION (ACLU)$1,000
MISSION HIGH FOUNDATION$1,000
TEACH WITH AFRICA$1,000
GLOBAL IMPACT FUND$515
21st CENTURY FOUNDATION$500
ONE PURPOSE SCHOOL$500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS VA$265
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $300 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
CT
CA
VA
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 63% of Virginia Lopez Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Virginia Lopez Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$293k · 5 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$293k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+40%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +16%
  • RH
    RUMSEY HALL SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +44%
  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +283%

Funded once

  • ES
    EXODUS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -9%
  • AS
    ATHLETIC SCHOLARS ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IB
    IMAGINE BUS PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
2
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

5
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
6
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
7
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
8
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
9
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
10
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
United Nations International School

Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Purpose School Inc and the most unlike its peers is Global Impact Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $845,701 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCEAST HARLEM SCHOOL AT EXODUS HOUSE — $231,400 · OtherEAST HARLEM SCHOOL AT EXODUS …SOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC — $30,000 · OtherSOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INCATHLETIC SCHOLARS ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM (ASAP) — $20,000 · OtherATHLETIC SCHOLARS ADVANCEMENT…+12 more — $36,096 · Other+12 moreEXODUS SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationRUMSEY HALL SCHOOL INC — $20,000 · EducationNew York University — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $1,500 · EducationEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $3,090 · Civil RightsCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $2,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $300 · Human ServicesTEACH WITH AFRICA — $1,000 · InternationalGLOBAL IMPACT FUND — $515 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $531 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$845,701Other$317,496Education$51,500Civil Rights$3,090Human Services$2,300International$1,515Recreation & Sports$531

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $845,701 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEXODUS SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRUMSEY HALL SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DARTMOUTH INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetIMAGINE BUS PROJECT — $8,750 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $3,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEACH WITH AFRICA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEducation Outside — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission High Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $531 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL IMPACT FUND — $515 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE PURPOSE SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY COLLEGE 21ST CENTURY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY16.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rmlow Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Virginia Lopez Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Virginia Lopez Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Virginia Lopez Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph