Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rmlow Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$505k
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$719kCommunity Improvement$322kHuman Services$306kReligion$286kCrime & Legal$274kYouth Development$217kInternational$187kRecreation & Sports$121kOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k43 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $222k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
$3,600
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROP ORGANIZATION$60,000
NORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$60,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$50,000
13TH TRIBE$37,800
COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA$30,000
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY$30,000
THE KITCHEN$24,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$20,000
CHABAD OF COLE VALLEY$19,800
CONVERGENCE CENTER FOR POLICY RESOLUTION$18,000
MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE$18,000
CAMP TAWONGA$12,100
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$12,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$6,882
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO$6,432
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $317k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%13TH TRIBE: $38k → 8%13TH TRIBE: $36k → 8%13TH TRIBE: $36k → 8%LA LUZ CENTER: $3k → 9%CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S LAW & POLICY: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S LAW AND POLICY: $3k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $6k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $4k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $4k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $4k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $4k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $4k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH: $24k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH: $18k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH: $18k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH: $18k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $8k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NM
KS
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 79 repeat orgs$525k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

79 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
71

Total granted

$2.3M
$373k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+21%

Still filing today

59%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CROP ORGANIZATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $192k · revenue ×18
  • AH
    AIM HIGH
    4× · 2018–2021 · $118k · revenue +103%
  • 1
    13THTRIBEORG
    3× · 2021–2024 · $110k · revenue +60% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • AT
    ANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • SP
    SAINT PAUL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • MB
    MONTGOMERY BAIL OUT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue -97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
3
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
4
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
5
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
12
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Watering Minds Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community Organizati…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%10%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%24%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
7/124
the rest of the field
14%
25,997/186,854

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/116
Grantees still filing
69/116
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KITCHEN SLOW DOWN JEW UP — $96,000 · OtherKITCHEN SLOW DOWN JEW UPCHABAD OF COLE VALLEY — $83,480 · OtherCHABAD OF COLE VALLEYIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL — $64,282 · OtherPAWS FOR LIFE FOR K9 RESCUE — $60,000 · OtherNORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $73,205 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $49,000 · Other+113 more — $821,479 · Other+113 moreEXODUS SCHOOL — $199,000 · EducationEXODUS SCHOOLHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $80,000 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY…CONVERGENCE CENTER FOR POLICY RESOLUTION — $34,980 · EducationCONVERGENCE CENTER…DEFY VENTURES INC — $30,070 · EducationDEFY VENTURES INCCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC — $30,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF ST SCHO…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $21,000 · EducationJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay — $18,000 · EducationPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE — $18,000 · Education+11 more — $75,442 · Education+11 moreAIM HIGH — $118,000 · Human ServicesAIM HIGH13THTRIBEORG — $109,800 · Human Services13THTRIBEORGLarkin Street Youth Services — $98,100 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Yo…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $49,782 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY…HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $18,412 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $15,000 · Human Services+3 more — $26,000 · Human Services+3 moreCROP ORGANIZATION — $192,000 · Crime & LegalMONTGOMERY BAIL OUT FUND — $18,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $9,000 · Crime & LegalPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $100,400 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $65,900 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $9,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $16,400 · PhilanthropyMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $144,000 · Community ImprovementDELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATION — $45,000 · Community ImprovementMEET INTERNATIONAL INC — $18,600 · InternationalFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA — $18,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $18,000 · InternationalHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $14,400 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND — $10,284 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $7,200 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $5,000 · InternationalUKRAINIAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $3,600 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $3,600 · International+2 more — $4,800 · International
Other$1,432,446Education$506,492Human Services$435,094Crime & Legal$219,000Philanthropy$191,700Community Improvement$189,000International$103,484

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEXODUS SCHOOL — $199,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCROP ORGANIZATION — $192,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $144,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAIM HIGH — $118,000 over 4y, 11% of budget13THTRIBEORG — $109,800 over 3y, 41% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $100,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $98,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $73,205 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $65,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $49,782 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $49,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATION — $45,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetIMAGINE BUS PROJECT — $36,880 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCONVERGENCE CENTER FOR POLICY RESOLUTION — $34,980 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUltimate Impact Inc — $34,523 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $32,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDEFY VENTURES INC — $30,070 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEducation Outside — $28,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDEEPWATER EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION PROJECT — $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMEET INTERNATIONAL INC — $18,600 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $18,412 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY — $18,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA — $18,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW PRESS INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIntersection for the Arts — $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE — $18,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM — $14,438 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BREATH FOUNDATION — $14,371 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFrameline Inc — $13,725 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM PATH INITIATIVE INC — $12,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA — $11,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLUND UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,800 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $10,284 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWISSAHICKON CHARTER SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXODUS SCHOOL
  • Who funds CROP ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER
  • Who funds AIM HIGH
  • Who funds 13THTRIBEORG
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA
  • Who funds NORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds DELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds IMAGINE BUS PROJECT
  • Who funds CONVERGENCE CENTER FOR POLICY RESOLUTION
  • Who funds Ultimate Impact Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA
  • Who funds DEFY VENTURES INC
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC
  • Who funds Education Outside
  • Who funds ANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DEEPWATER EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION PROJECT
  • Who funds MEET INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY BAIL OUT FUND
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA39.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Koret Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · New Israel Fund · East Bay Community Foundation · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · Dare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rmlow Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 173 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph