· Private foundation
Virginia L Park Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER NW | $1,200 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER WA & ID | $1,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM | $1,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST | $1,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS | $1,000 |
| CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS | $1,000 |
| RAINER ATHLETES | $1,000 |
| BELLEVUE LIFESPRING | $1,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER TX | $1,000 |
| YOUTH EASTSIDE SERVICES | $1,000 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER | $1,000 |
| LEV FOUNDATION | $550 |
| FLIGHT FEATHERS DANCE COLLECTIVE | $500 |
| THE SOPHIA WAY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +8%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC7× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +13%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC7× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- SUSTANFORD UNIVERSITY PSYCHIATRY GEN SUPPORT FUNDone grant, 2020 · $2k
- SFSEATTLE FOUNDATION LB 1069one grant, 2020 · $500
- STSOGOREA TE LAND TRUSTgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.
Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
The mission of planned parenthood of the columbia willamette (ppcw) is to provide, promote and protect access to quality reproductive and sexual health care in oregon and southwest washington.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.
See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…
A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Center for Reproductive Rights Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEV Foundation ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds RAINIER ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds URBAN SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EASTSIDE PATHWAYS ↗
- Who funds SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KENT SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · David & Cathy Habib Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Cooper-MacGrath Foundation · Bacon Family Foundation · Overlake Medical Center & Clinics · Aven Foundation · Thurston Charitable Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Virginia L Park Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.