· Private foundation
Cooper-MacGrath Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k9 grants · $255k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAINIER SCHOLARS | $75,000 |
| ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER | $55,000 |
| RAINIER PREP | $40,000 |
| API CHAYA | $35,000 |
| HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS | $35,000 |
| CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB | $30,000 |
| OLIVE CREST | $30,000 |
| MARYS PLACE SEATTLE | $30,000 |
| YOUTH EASTSIDE SERVICES | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF YOUTH | $20,000 |
| RECOVERY CAFE | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSRAINIER SCHOLARS8× · 2017–2024 · $405k · revenue +359%
- HHOPELINK7× · 2017–2023 · $150k · revenue +74%
- YEYouth Eastside Services8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +126%
Funded once
- UNUPLIFT NORTHWESTone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +12%
- OCOLIVE CREST - SEATTLE BRANCHone grant, 2023 · $20k
- YYOUTHCAREone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…
To provide individuals with criminal histories the opportunity to lead healthy, productive lives, and further the fostering of low income housing.
Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward
Youth progress is a nonprofit organization that is licensed as a child caring agency (cca) to serve youth ages 12-25 in the custody of the oregon youth authority (oya) or the oregon department of human services (dhs). youth progress uses…
We exist to provide pathways to freedom, safety, and hope for victims of sex trafficking and people involved in the sex trade.
Transforming lives through safety, healing and empowerment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary's Place Seattle and the most unlike its peers is Chief Seattle Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINIER PREP ↗
- Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds API CHAYA ↗
- Who funds HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds KIDVANTAGE ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SACK LUNCH ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY CAFE ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE 180 ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAMBERT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EASTSIDE PATHWAYS ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds STREET YOUTH MINITRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Gates Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · David & Cathy Habib Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cooper-MacGrath Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cooper-MacGrath Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cooper-MacGrath Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.