Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vincent Genovese Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$408kFood & Nutrition$203kReligion$120kRecreation & Sports$84kHuman Services$79kEducation$78kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kYouth Development$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $128k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Connecticut Cancer Foundation$25,000
Camp Fire USA First Texas$18,599
Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County$15,195
Unbound Now$15,000
Mission India$12,309
Endowment Fund of Rotary ClubFt Wor$12,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$10,019
First Baptist Church of Laurelton$10,000
Crazy8 Ministries$10,000
The WARM Place$9,961
OneChild$7,736
Cristo Rey Fort Worth College Prep$7,500
Cancer Care Services$6,472
Presbyterian Night Shelter$5,080
Recovery Resource Council$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Fort Worth Fire Service Resource Ne: $25k → 9%Burleson Independent School Distric: $10k → 10%Endowment Fund of Rotary ClubFt Wor: $12k → 11%Unbound Now: $15k → 16%Connecticut Cancer Foundation: $60k → 7%American Cancer Society: $15k → 13%First Baptist Church of Laurelton: $10k → 11%Fort Worth Fire Service Resource Ne: $10k → 9%Camp Fire USA First Texas: $19k → 11%Unbound Now: $15k → 16%Connecticut Cancer Foundation: $58k → 7%American Cancer Society: $10k → 13%Fort Worth Fire Service Resource Ne: $5k → 9%Endowment Fund of Rotary ClubFt Wor: $6k → 11%Connecticut Cancer Foundation: $55k → 7%American Cancer Society: $10k → 13%Camp Fire USA First Texas: $18k → 11%Connecticut Cancer Foundation: $50k → 7%Endowment Fund of Rotary ClubFt Wor: $6k → 11%Connecticut Cancer Foundation: $50k → 7%Camp Fire USA First Texas: $15k → 11%Connecticut Cancer Foundation: $25k → 7%Endowment Fund of Rotary ClubFt Wor: $6k → 11%Camp Fire USA First Texas: $15k → 11%Presbyterian Night Shelter: $5k → 11%Camp Fire USA First Texas: $15k → 11%Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County: $25k → 11%Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County: $25k → 11%Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County: $25k → 11%Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County: $20k → 11%Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County: $15k → 11%Meals on Wheels of Tarrant County: $15k → 11%Cassata High School: $10k → 11%The WARM Place: $10k → 11%Cancer Care Services: $9k → 11%Cancer Care Services: $6k → 11%Recovery Resource Council: $8k → 11%Unbound North Texas: $20k → 11%UnboundAntioch Fort Worth: $20k → 11%Unbound North Texas: $20k → 11%UnboundAntioch Fort Worth: $10k → 11%Cristo Rey Fort Worth College Prep: $8k → 11%Cristo Rey Fort Worth College Prep: $8k → 11%Tarrant Area Food Bank: $20k → 11%Tarrant Area Food Bank: $15k → 11%Tarrant Area Food Bank: $15k → 11%Tarrant Area Food Bank: $15k → 11%Tarrant Area Food Bank: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 26 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
15

Total granted

$1.2M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+84%

Still filing today

62%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $298k · revenue +37%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +54%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $78k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BI
    Burleson Independent School Distric
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • 2
    22KILL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -32%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $800 · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
2
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

3
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
4
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
5
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
6
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
7
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
8
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
9
Young Texans Against Cancer

Young texans against cancer (ytac) is an independent, nonprofit organization comprised of men and women who have been affected by cancer or are seeking to become more actively involved in the cancer community. our organization is focused…

10
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

11
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council and the most unlike its peers is Flower Mound Firefighter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $297,500 · OtherCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INCCamp Fire USA First Texas — $84,099 · OtherCamp Fire USA First TexasTarrant Area Food Bank — $77,519 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankMISSION INDIA — $42,309 · OtherFort Worth Fire Service Resource Ne — $40,000 · OtherUnBound North Texas — $40,000 · OtherUnion Gospel Mission Tarrant Co — $33,000 · OtherRecovery Resource Council — $32,500 · OtherThe WARM Place — $31,461 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherCASSATA HIGH SCHOOL — $29,500 · Other+25 more — $119,844 · Other+25 moreMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $125,195 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WH…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $35,000 · HealthJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation — $24,000 · HealthCANCER CARE SERVICES — $17,072 · HealthCRAZY8 MINISTRIES INC — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY — $25,080 · Housing & ShelterUNBOUND NOW — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERTREE ACADEMY — $11,500 · Youth DevelopmentENDOWMENT FUND OF ROTARY CLUB OF FORT WORTH — $31,750 · Community ImprovementONECHILD GLOBAL — $29,858 · International
Other$857,732Food & Nutrition$125,195Health$76,072Housing & Shelter$60,080Youth Development$41,500Community Improvement$31,750International$29,858

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $297,500 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $125,195 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $77,519 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUnBound North Texas — $40,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCRAZY8 MINISTRIES INC — $35,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRecovery Resource Council — $32,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetENDOWMENT FUND OF ROTARY CLUB OF FORT WORTH — $31,750 over 5y, 27% of budgetUNBOUND NOW — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL — $29,858 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED — $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY — $25,080 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation — $24,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES — $17,072 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY — $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budget22KILL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORT WORTH FOUNDATION — $800 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank
  • Who funds UnBound North Texas
  • Who funds CRAZY8 MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Recovery Resource Council
  • Who funds ENDOWMENT FUND OF ROTARY CLUB OF FORT WORTH
  • Who funds UNBOUND NOW
  • Who funds ONECHILD GLOBAL
  • Who funds YOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
  • Who funds Jordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation
  • Who funds CANCER CARE SERVICES
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY
  • Who funds FLOWER MOUND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 22KILL
  • Who funds FORT WORTH FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX24.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · The Morris Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Jes Edwards Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vincent Genovese Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph