Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k77 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Eden Prairie Lions Clubs Foundation Inc$100,000
St Lukes McCall Foundation Inc$50,000
Wayne State University$50,000
San Joaquin College of Law$50,000
University of Arizona$50,000
The Esteban Toledo Family Foundation$30,000
Adam Leventhal Memorial School and Museum$30,000
Teen Life Challenge of Dallas Inc$25,000
Mayo Clinic (Scottsdale AZ)$25,000
Turning Point USA$25,000
My Own Book Fund Inc$25,000
St Rose Dominican Health Foundation$25,000
Minneapolis Recreation Development$25,000
St Rose Dominican Health Foundation$25,000
Future Smiles$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kathryn Heidenrich Adult Center Inc: $10k → 17%Joint Task Force K9s: $25k → 13%Make A Wish Nevada: $10k → 13%American National Red Cross: $15k → 14%Toby's Place Inc: $10k → 8%Toby's Place Inc: $10k → 8%New Vista Ranch: $10k → 13%Transition Services Inc: $10k → 13%Transition Services Inc: $10k → 13%Project 150: $10k → 13%Project 150: $10k → 13%Project 150: $10k → 13%Project 150: $5k → 13%Catholic Charities of Southern NV: $25k → 13%Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada: $10k → 13%Catholic Charities of Southern NV: $10k → 13%Project Marilyn Inc: $10k → 13%Friends in the Desert Foundation Inc: $5k → 13%Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $10k → 13%Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $10k → 13%Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $10k → 13%Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $10k → 13%Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $10k → 13%Warrior Suicide Prevention Foundation: $10k → 13%Veterans Transition Rescue Center Inc: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 60 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

60 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
65

Total granted

$2.0M
$655k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+8%

Still filing today

65%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $530k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    Eden Prairie Lions Club Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +32%
  • CT
    CONTINUING THE LEGACY DANCE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +104%
  • FA
    Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • SP
    SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +1%
  • CC
    Catholic Charities
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.

Animals
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
3
Desert Dog Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
4
Nevada Boxer Rescue

Rescue, rehab, and place abandoned dogs

Animals
5
Working Dogs of Nevada Rescue

Our mission is to save, rehabilitate and rehome animals which may otherwise be euthanized at shelters due to their behavioural issues.

—
6
Las Vegas Valley Humane Society

Las vegas valley humane society is dedicated to improving the welfare of animals in southern nevada. the organization's primary emphasis is on stray and abandoned animals and reducing animal overpopulation.

Animals
7
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
8
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
9
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
10
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

—
11
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
12
Lucky Dog Rescue Inc

Rescue dogs and cats from the euthanasia lists of high kill shelters in the phoenix az metro area, then get them spayed or neutered, vaccinated, micro-chipped, and adopted out to new loving homes.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Asian Chamber of Commerce Foundtion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Local History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Food PantriesCommunity FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%13%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%10%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/126
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,439

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
102/107
Grantees still filing
56/107
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

San Joaquin College of Law — $60,000 · OtherUniversity of Arizona — $60,000 · OtherST LUKE'S MCCALL FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherEden Prairie Lions Club Foundation Inc — $120,000 · OtherEden Prairie Lions Club Foundation Inc+83 more — $1,366,200 · Other+83 moreFORGOTTEN DOGS ANIMAL RESCUE — $50,000 · AnimalsFORGOTTEN DOGS A…CRAZY4PAWZ ANIMAL RESCUE — $45,000 · AnimalsCRAZY4PAWZ ANIMA…HOOF AND PAW RESCUE INC — $40,000 · AnimalsHOOF AND PAW RES…STREET DOGZ — $35,000 · AnimalsSTREET DOGZLION HABITAT RANCH INC — $25,000 · AnimalsLION HABITAT RAN…AARF - Animal Angels Rescue Foundation — $25,000 · AnimalsAARF - Animal An…PAWSITIVE DIFFERENCE — $25,000 · AnimalsPAWSITIVE DIFFER…START OVER ROVER — $20,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · AnimalsAll Friends Animal Sanctuary — $20,000 · Animals+16 more — $155,000 · Animals+16 moreFoundation Assisting Seniors Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesFoundatio…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $45,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …PROJECT 150 — $35,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 1…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …JOINT TASK FORCE K9S — $25,000 · Human ServicesJOINT TAS…TOBYS PLACE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesTOBYS PLA…TRANSITION SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesTRANSITIO…NEW VISTA RANCH INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH NEVADA — $10,000 · Human ServicesWARRIORS SUICIDE PREVENTION FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesProject Marilyn Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesKathryn Heidenreich Adult Center — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthFUTURE SMILES — $45,000 · HealthMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthALS Arizona — $25,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $10,000 · HealthRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO — $10,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 · HealthREBOOT RECOVERY INC — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $10,000 · HealthTHE ADAM LEVENTHAL MEMORIAL SCHOOL AND MUSEUM — $60,000 · Arts & CultureCONTINUING THE LEGACY DANCE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureCity of the World Inc — $25,000 · Arts & CultureNEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL — $15,000 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUE — $15,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEON ART — $10,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureLos Angeles Art Association — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNEVADA SCHOOL OF THE ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMy Own Book Fund Inc — $40,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $30,000 · EducationASIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDTION — $25,000 · EducationJOYCE IVY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationAlisas Angels Foundation — $20,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $10,000 · EducationBoise Bully Breed Rescue — $10,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationNATIONAL BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS — $10,000 · EducationAWARENESS IS PREVENTION INC — $10,000 · EducationLEADERS IN TRAINING — $10,000 · EducationTHREE SQUARE — $127,000 · Food & NutritionHeartland Hunger & Resource Center — $31,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS FOODBANK — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,666,200Animals$460,000Human Services$280,000Health$225,000Arts & Culture$220,000Education$195,000Food & Nutrition$173,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHREE SQUARE — $127,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSan Joaquin College of Law — $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST LUKE'S MCCALL FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ADAM LEVENTHAL MEMORIAL SCHOOL AND MUSEUM — $60,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetCONTINUING THE LEGACY DANCE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetFORGOTTEN DOGS ANIMAL RESCUE — $50,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetFoundation Assisting Seniors Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCRAZY4PAWZ ANIMAL RESCUE — $45,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetFUTURE SMILES — $45,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMy Own Book Fund Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSOUTHERN NEVADA JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION — $40,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetSTREET DOGZ — $35,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetPROJECT 150 — $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRICHARD SABALA FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHeartland Hunger & Resource Center — $31,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN ACCESS INSTITUTE — $31,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLION HABITAT RANCH INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetASIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDTION — $25,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetALS Arizona — $25,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARF - Animal Angels Rescue Foundation — $25,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetPAWSITIVE DIFFERENCE — $25,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetJOINT TASK FORCE K9S — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTOBYS PLACE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSTART OVER ROVER — $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOYCE IVY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTRANSITION SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAll Friends Animal Sanctuary — $20,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCAN DO CANINES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAlisas Angels Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VISTA RANCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouse of Second Chances Animal Rescue — $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEON ART — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPawtastic Friends Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dave & Cheryl Duffiel…Nevada Community Foun…Canarelli Family Foun…United Way of Souther…Mgm Resorts FoundationWynn Resorts Foundati…NV Energy Charitable …The Tito and Sandra T…Vegas Golden Knights …The Boyd Family Found…Raiders Foundation NvMondays Dark
Dave & Cheryl Duffield FoundationNV33.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dave & Cheryl Duffield Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Canarelli Family Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The Tito and Sandra Tiberti Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · The Boyd Family Foundation · Raiders Foundation Nv · Mondays Dark

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 162 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines