Skip to content

· Public charity

Village Thrift Shop Inc

To accept and resell donated goods and to focus on recycling through sale or proper disposal of unwanted or unneeded items.

$246k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2026.

Human Services$252kEducation$241kHealth$179kFood & Nutrition$166kCommunity Improvement$138kArts & Culture$85kRecreation & Sports$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $201,180, the rows itemized in this filing. The $246,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,820 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $134k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$275k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Estes Park Salud Foundation$60,000
Estes Park Senior Citizens Center$30,000
Estes Park Education Foundation$24,640
Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park$20,000
Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Success$20,000
Estes Park Post 119 Charitable Foundation$20,000
Estes Valley Crisis Advocates$19,800
Estes Park Club Sports$6,740
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park: $31k → 11%Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Success: $30k → 11%Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Success: $30k → 11%Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Success: $30k → 11%Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park: $21k → 11%Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park: $20k → 11%Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Success: $20k → 11%Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Success: $20k → 11%Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park: $20k → 11%Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park: $18k → 11%Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park: $15k → 11%CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +174% since the first grant, against -59% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$1.0M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+174%
-59%

Still filing today

73%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    ESTES PARK SALUD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2026 · $179k · revenue +174%
  • CM
    CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK
    7× · 2018–2026 · $137k · revenue +69%
  • EV
    Estes Valley Crisis Advocates Inc
    9× · 2018–2026 · $134k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • EV
    ESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • EA
    ESTES ARTS DISTRICT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • GH
    Glen Haven Area Volunteer Fire Departmen
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Luis Valley Regional Emergency & Trauma Advisory Council

The mission is: To develop, foster and support excellence in Trauma and the emergency medical system within the San Luis Valley.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Estes Park Western Heritage Foundation

Our organization provides scholarships to students residing in the Estes Valley, supporting their pursuit of higher education. By offering financial assistance, we help alleviate the burden of tuition costs and promote educational…

Arts & Culture
3
Ouray County Historical Society

Historical Society for Ouray County, Colorado Museum, Historical Programs, mining, ranching and indian exhibit and artifacts, archiving historical documents and historical programs for the general public.

—
4
Estes Park Medical Center Foundation

Estes Park Health Foundation increases community awareness of Estes Park Health (EPH). The Foundation develops, manages, and distributes funds to assist them in fulfilling their mission.

Health
5
Evans Scholars Foundation - Colorado

Educational

Education
6
Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wildernesses

The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…

Environment
7
Eden Valley Trail Trust

Dedicated to the management, maintenance, and preservation of trails in the Eden Valley area for recreational and conservation purposes.

Recreation & Sports
8
Englewood Hulls Volunteer Fire Dept

The mission of the Englewood Hulls Volunteer Fire Department is the delivery of life safety services. The department provides 24-hour emergency response to a variety of critical situations, primarily fires.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Estes Park Bright Christmas Ltd

provide Christmas gifts, groceries, school supplies, shoes, clothing, to children of needy families in the Estes Park school district

Human Services
10
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
11
Colorado Energy Foundation

The Colorado Energy Foundation was incorporated in 2019 as a 501(c)(3) supporting organization of the Colorado Oil & Gas Association and seeks to amplify existing philanthropic efforts of the oil and gas industry in Colorado and develop…

Community Improvement
12
Eldorado Brookview Volunteer Fire Company Inc

Provide emergency firefighting, medical and rescue services.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Estes Park Salud Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ballet Renaissance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ESTES PARK SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $132,400 · OtherESTES PARK SENIOR CITIZENS C…Estes Park School District R-3: $73,109 · OtherEstes Park School District R…ESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK FOUNDATION: $17,900 · OtherESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND …ESTES VALLEY COMMUNITY GARDEN INC: $13,041 · OtherESTES ARTS DISTRICT INC: $11,369 · OtherGlen Haven Area Volunteer Fire Departmen: $10,435 · Other+5 more: $31,360 · Other+5 moreCROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $136,600 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS MINISTRY OF EST…ESTES VALLEY INVESTMENT IN CHILDHOOD SUC: $130,000 · Human ServicesESTES VALLEY INVESTMENT IN…ESTES PARK SALUD FOUNDATION: $179,200 · PhilanthropyESTES PARK SALUD …ESTES PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $112,692 · EducationESTES PARK EDUCA…Estes Park Nonprofit Resource Center Inc: $47,852 · EducationEstes Park Nonpr…Estes Park Learning Place Inc: $9,586 · EducationEstes Park Learn…Estes Valley Crisis Advocates Inc: $133,555 · Community ImprovementEstes Valley …THE ESTES PARK POST 119 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $68,050 · Arts & CultureBALLET RENAISSANCE: $17,360 · Arts & CultureGLEN HAVEN FLOOD RELIEF INC: $7,040 · Public Safety & DisasterESTES VALLEY LAND TRUST: $6,400 · Environment
Other$289,614Human Services$266,600Philanthropy$179,200Education$170,130Community Improvement$133,555Arts & Culture$85,410Public Safety & Disaster$7,040Environment$6,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESTES PARK SALUD FOUNDATION: $179,200 over 8y, 21% of budgetCROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK: $136,600 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetEstes Valley Crisis Advocates Inc: $133,555 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetESTES VALLEY INVESTMENT IN CHILDHOOD SUC: $130,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetESTES PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $112,692 over 5y, 66% of budgetTHE ESTES PARK POST 119 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $68,050 over 4y, 14% of budgetEstes Park Nonprofit Resource Center Inc: $47,852 over 3y, 24% of budgetBALLET RENAISSANCE: $17,360 over 2y, 16% of budgetGlen Haven Area Volunteer Fire Departmen: $10,435 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetEstes Park Learning Place Inc: $9,586 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESTES PARK SALUD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK ↗
  • Who funds Estes Valley Crisis Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds ESTES VALLEY INVESTMENT IN CHILDHOOD SUC ↗
  • Who funds ESTES PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ESTES PARK POST 119 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Estes Park Nonprofit Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BALLET RENAISSANCE ↗
  • Who funds Glen Haven Area Volunteer Fire Departmen ↗
  • Who funds Estes Park Learning Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLEN HAVEN FLOOD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTES VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ColoradoCO32× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Colorado Gives Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · The Morriss Family Foundation · United Way of Larimer County · Shell USA Company Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Village Thrift Shop Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Village Thrift Shop Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Village Thrift Shop Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Village Thrift Shop Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Village Thrift Shop’s filings →

    More from the funding graph