Skip to content

· Private foundation

Victor J Mueller Charitable and Educational Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$61kHousing & Shelter$24kInternational$21kHuman Services$19kHealth$6kEducation$5k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$201k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cedarville University$3,000
CRU Foundation$2,250
Finish Line Ministries$2,000
Sunshine Ministries$2,000
Extollo Ineternational$2,000
CEF of Missouri Geataer St Louis$1,500
Prenancy Help Center$1,000
Barnabus Foundation$1,000
Grace Evangelical Ministries$1,000
Biblical Ministries Worldwide$750
Samaritans Purse$750
Moody Bible Institute$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Extollo International: $3k → 10%Casas Por Christo: $6k → 21%CRU Foundation: $4k → 13%Grace Evangelical Ministries: $1k → 11%Samaritans Purse: $1k → 21%Greater Europe Mission: $1k → 9%Cedarville University: $3k → 9%Finish Line Ministries: $2k → 15%Western Illinois University: $2k → 20%Extollo International: $3k → 10%Casas Por Christo: $5k → 21%CRU Foundation: $2k → 13%Greater Europe Mission: $1k → 9%Finish Line Ministries: $2k → 15%Extollo International: $3k → 10%Casas Por Christo: $5k → 21%CRU Foundation: $2k → 13%Greater Europe Mission: $1k → 9%Finish Line Ministries: $2k → 15%Extollo International: $3k → 10%Casas Por Christo: $5k → 21%CRU Foundation: $2k → 13%CEF of Greater Saint Louis: $2k → 11%Finish Line Ministries: $2k → 15%Extollo International: $3k → 10%Casas Por Christo: $5k → 21%CRU Foundation: $2k → 13%CEF of Greater Saint Louis: $2k → 11%Finish Line Ministries: $2k → 15%Extollo International: $3k → 10%CRU The Great Commission Foundation: $1k → 13%CEF of Greater Saint Louis: $2k → 11%Finish Line Ministries: $2k → 15%Extollo Ineternational: $2k → 10%CEF of Missouri Geataer St Louis: $2k → 11%Extollo International: $2k → 10%CEF of Greater St Louis: $2k → 11%CEF of Greater St Louis: $2k → 11%CEF of Greater St Louis: $2k → 11%Barean Mission Alliance: $2k → 11%CEF of Greater St Louis: $1k → 11%Pregnancy Help Center: $1k → 11%Pregnancy help Center: $1k → 11%Pregnancy Help Center: $1k → 11%Pregnancy Help Center: $1k → 11%South County Bible Church: $3k → 11%South County Bible Church: $3k → 11%South County Bible Church: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
OH
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 14 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$119k
$9k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CASAS POR CRISTO
    5× · 2017–2021 · $24k · revenue +72%
  • EI
    EXTOLLO INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • SM
    SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • BM
    Barean Mission Alliance
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • WI
    Western Illinois University
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
3
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
4
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
5
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
6
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
7
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
8
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
9
Christ Mission College

Cmc passionately develops a students god-given potential in a practical process of biblical higher education, discipleship, and practical experience for sacrificial service in the church and community to expand gods kingdom in the world…

—
10
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
11
Euromedia Missions
—
12
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Europe Mission; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRU Foundation: $12,050 · OtherCRU FoundationSOUTH COUNTY BIBLE CHURCH: $7,900 · OtherSOUTH COUNTY BIBLE CHURCHPregnancy Help Center: $7,100 · OtherPregnancy Help CenterCEF of Greater St Louis: $5,800 · OtherCEF of Greater St LouisCEF of Greater Saint Louis: $5,500 · OtherCEF of Greater Saint LouisIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRU The Great Commission Foundation: $2,400 · OtherBarean Mission Alliance: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $8,350 · Other+10 moreCASAS POR CRISTO: $24,150 · Housing & ShelterCASAS POR CRISTOEXTOLLO INTERNATIONAL: $19,600 · InternationalEXTOLLO INTERNAT…FINISH LINE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $11,300 · ReligionFINISH LINE MIN…GREATER EUROPE MISSION: $4,500 · ReligionGREATER EUROPE …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,750 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PUR…BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · ReligionBARNABAS FOUNDA…SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE MIN…Cedarville University: $3,000 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,350 · Education
Other$55,100Housing & Shelter$24,150International$19,600Religion$19,050Human Services$14,500Education$4,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASAS POR CRISTO: $24,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEXTOLLO INTERNATIONAL: $19,600 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC: $14,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFINISH LINE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $11,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER EUROPE MISSION: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASAS POR CRISTO ↗
  • Who funds EXTOLLO INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FINISH LINE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GREATER EUROPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Victor J Mueller Charitable and Educational Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Victor J Mueller Charitable and Educational Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Victor J Mueller Charitable and Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph