Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$425kCivil Rights$135kCrime & Legal$128kHealth$94kPhilanthropy$18k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $118k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$25,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$25,000
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC$15,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES$12,500
THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT CTY$10,000
METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY$10,000
GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC$10,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION$10,000
LADDER ALLIANCE$5,000
THE PARENTING CENTER$5,000
N TX AREA COMMUNITY HLTH CTRS$5,000
LENA POPE HOME INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $13k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $13k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $13k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $13k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $13k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $13k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $25k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $10k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $5k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $5k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $5k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $5k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$780k · 16 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$780k
$10k

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +40%
  • CO
    CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +8%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • CC
    COOK CHILDRENS CARE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
Tifton Judicial Circuit Shelter Inc

To end domestic and sexual violence, as well as child sexual and physical abuse, through a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to investigations, advocacy, and support, while working in the community to change attitudes, beliefs and…

Human Services
3
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
4
Texas Council On Family Violence Inc

Texas council on family violence is the only 501(c)3 nonprofit coalition in texas dedicated solely to creating safer communities and freedom from family violence. with a statewide reach and direct local impact, tcfv, with the collective…

Crime & Legal
5
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
6
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
7
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
8
Family Safety Center Inc

The family safety center exists to promote safety and justice in tulsa county through co-located multi-disciplinary services that offer protection, hope and healing to victims of intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault,…

Crime & Legal
9
Rape Crisis Center of Collin County

The mission of the turning point is to provide counseling, education and advocacy to those impacted by sexual violence.

—
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
11
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
12
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wings of a Butterfly. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $125,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTYCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $75,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVESGUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesGUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INCLENA POPE HOME INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INCTHE PARENTING CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARENTING CENTERALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $135,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INCCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $90,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INCTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF FW: $50,000 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF …N TX AREA COMMUNITY HLTH CTRS: $30,000 · OtherN TX AREA COMMUNITY HL…METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $30,000 · OtherMETHODIST JUSTICE MINI…THE LADDER ALLIANCE: $30,000 · OtherTHE LADDER ALLIANCECOOK CHILDRENS CARE PROGRAM: $10,000 · OtherCOOK CHILDRENS CARE PR…Wings of a Butterfly: $6,000 · OtherTexas Health Resources Foundation: $60,000 · HealthTexas Hea…THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN…5 STONES FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyTrauma Support Services of North Texas: $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterChildren At Risk: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$325,000Civil Rights$225,000Other$156,000Health$70,000Philanthropy$17,500Public Safety & Disaster$4,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $125,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PARENTING CENTER: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LADDER ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budget5 STONES FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 3y, 18% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWings of a Butterfly: $6,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTrauma Support Services of North Texas: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChildren At Risk: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENTING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LADDER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds 5 STONES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
  • Who funds Trauma Support Services of North Texas ↗
  • Who funds Children At Risk ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Garvey Texas Foundation IncTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · The Morris Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · The Alcon Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258’s filings →

    More from the funding graph