How much did VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258 grant in FY2024?

VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258 reported 12 grants totaling $127,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258 based?

VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258 is based in TX.

VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$128k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$25k

Largest

01What you fund

0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$268kCivil Rights$185kHealth$50kPhilanthropy$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kCrime & Legal$2kOther$136k

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $25k
$10k–50k7 grants · $103k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$25,000
SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$20,000
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC$15,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES$12,500
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION$10,000
THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF FW$10,000
GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC$10,000
METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY$5,000
LENA POPE HOME INC$5,000
THE PARENTING CENTER$5,000
N TX AREA COMMUNITY HLTH CTRS$5,000
LADDER ALLIANCE$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $268k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$642k · 16 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$642k

$20k

Still filing today

81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN
5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +71%
SO
SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +40%
CO
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +61%

Funded once

CC
COOK CHILDRENS CARE PROGRAM
one grant, 2020 · $10k
MJ
METHODIST JUSTIC MINISTRY
one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Texas Forensic Nurse Examiners - Forensic

Through a coordinated community response The Forensic Center empowers victims, promotes healing & creates innovative & comprehensive solutions to fill gaps in victim services.

—

Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—

Family Compass

To build healthy families and a strong north texas community by preventing child abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal

Child Abuse Network Inc

To provide collaborative intervention services to child abuse victims, so that they are encouraged to embrace a future driven by hope. The Child Advocacy Networks (CAN) program consistently achieves its missional objectives to 1) provide…

Crime & Legal

Texans Care for Children Inc

Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocates of North Texas Inc

To provide court appointed volunteers who serve as advocates and help abused children obtain safe permanent home placements

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights

Texas Defender Service

Texas Defender Service (TDS) leads the fight to end excessive punishment in Texas.

Civil Rights

Family Abuse Center Inc

The family abuse center exists to elimate domestic violence in central texas by sheltering victims of domestic violence and by preventing abuse from occurring through intervention and education.

Human Services

Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas provides services to individuals affected by domestic and sexual violence. we provide shelter, counseling and advocacy to help build lives free from violence. we seek social change to end domestic and sexual…

—

UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—

Texprotects-the Texas Association for

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is 5 Stones Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

12/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$267,500Civil Rights$185,000Other$136,000Health$50,000Philanthropy$17,500Public Safety & Disaster$4,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Mary Potishman Lard Trust · The Morris Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: 5 STONES FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 851851387 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on 5 STONES FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258?

Find your warmest path to Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258?

More from the funding graph

VESTAL B SANDERS CHARITABLE FDN #WC258

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vestal B Sanders Charitable Fdn #Wc258?

More from the funding graph