Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vermont Institute for Human Flourishing Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$937k
Granted FY2023
46
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$803kReligion$540kCrime & Legal$110kHealth$104kSocial Science$96kInternational$55kPublic Benefit$50kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2023 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $536k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $360k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$841k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Institution for Jewish Thought$78,600
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Tamin Academy$60,000
Chabad on Campus$60,000
ETHAN ALLEN INSTITUTE$51,000
Central Fund of Israel$50,000
Rice Memorial School$45,000
Websterville School$45,000
Vermont Parent Representation Center$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
The Caroline Fund$30,000
Mater Christi School$30,000
Christ the King$25,000
Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation$25,000
St John The Baptist$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Capstone Community Action: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
OR
NJ
CA
VA
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 22 repeat orgs$990k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$560k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+64%

Still filing today

18%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $430k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23
HealthInternationalReligionEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    ETHAN ALLEN INSTITUTE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $96k · revenue +97% · 31% of their budget
  • HS
    HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +1%
  • FS
    FIRST STEP PREGNANCY CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CL
    Chabad Lubavitch
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $160k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $69k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rutland County Parent Child Center Inc

The Center is a resource for family growth and development in Rutland County, Vermont.

Human Services
2
Dayspring Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Center of the Upper Valley is an information and education center for young adults facing unexpected pregnancy and/or other consequences of premature sexual activity.

Health
3
Vermont Kin as Parents Inc

Support kin raising other relatives children

Human Services
4
Vermont Center for Family Studies

Our mission is to strengthen families and communities by improving human relationships. We do this through the training of expert family therapists, advisors, leaders, and family members in Bowen Family Systems Theory.

Human Services
5
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Vermont Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Vermont is an organization that protects civil liberties. It provides legal representation, communication, and advocacy with regards to rights guaranteed by the U.S. and Vermont Constitutions.

—
6
Vermont Federation of Families for Children's Mental Health Inc

To support families and children where a child or youth, age 0-22, is experiencing or at risk to experience emotional, behavioral, or mental health challanges.

Health
7
American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont Inc

The ACLU of Vermont is a membership organization that protects civil liberties. Its work includes communication and advocacy with regards to rights guaranteed by the U.S. and State Constitutions.

—
8
Vermont Assoc of Area Agencies on Aging

The Vermont Association of Area Agencies on Aging (V4A)supports and strengthens Vermonts five Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) to ensure that all Vermonters are able to age with health, independance and dignity.

Philanthropy
9
Vermont Parent Child Center Network

Vermont Parent Child Center Network is designed to assist the 15 Parent Child Centers located in Vermont by providing support and services to families they serve.

Human Services
10
Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform

Education of the public about the criminal justice system. Direct services to people struggling with substance use disorder, including case managment and recovery support.

Crime & Legal
11
Robins Nest Children's Center

Robins Nest Childrens Center provides high-quality early care and education in a play-based setting.

Human Services
12
The Catamount Institute

Catamount Institute is dedicated to connecting kids to the outdoors through environmental education and outdoor adventures.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Parent Representation Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Caroline Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chabad Lubavitch: $200,000 · OtherChabad LubavitchInstitution for Jewish Thought: $189,800 · OtherInstitution for Jewish ThoughtPRAGER UNIVERSITY: $160,000 · OtherPRAGER UNIVERSITYTamin Academy: $90,000 · OtherRice Memorial School: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $69,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $67,000 · OtherWebsterville School: $65,000 · Other+41 more: $960,554 · Other+41 moreETHAN ALLEN INSTITUTE: $96,000 · Arts & CultureCentral Fund of Israel: $50,000 · InternationalSpirit of America Worldwide: $5,000 · InternationalCALVIN COOLIDGE PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · ReligionJEWISH COMMUNITIES OF VERMONT INC: $15,000 · ReligionFIRST STEP PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $30,000 · HealthThe Womens Center: $6,500 · HealthJenna Tatro Memorial Fund: $1,500 · HealthUNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,876,354Arts & Culture$96,000International$55,000Religion$40,000Health$38,000Education$30,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetETHAN ALLEN INSTITUTE: $96,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION: $30,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST STEP PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetUNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCALVIN COOLIDGE PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITIES OF VERMONT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Womens Center: $6,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJenna Tatro Memorial Fund: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ETHAN ALLEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT PARENT REPRESENTATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Caroline Fund ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN COOLIDGE PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF VERMONT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vermont Institute for Human Flourishing Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vermont Institute for Human Flourishing Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc: 84% of income from government
  • United Christian Academy: 3% of income from government
  • Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vermont Institute for Human Flourishing Inc?

Find your warmest path to Vermont Institute for Human Flourishing Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $889k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vermont Institute for Human Flourishing’s filings →

More from the funding graph