Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vaughan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$84kPhilanthropy$69kArts & Culture$43kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$28kEnvironment$20kPublic Benefit$7kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO$15,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$7,500
ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,500
MUSEUM OF BIG BEND- SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERISTY$3,500
BAMC FISHER HOUSE$3,000
THE WITTE MUSEUM$3,000
FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION$3,000
UTSA DEAN'S FUND FOR THE COLLEGE OF SCIENCES$3,000
SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL CENTER OPERATING FUND$3,000
TRANSPLANTS FOR CHILDREN$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - MCDONALD OBSERVATORY$2,000
ACORN SCHOOL$2,000
THE SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $3k → 16%FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$291k · 23 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against -96% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$291k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-96%

Still filing today

35%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +6%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +18%
  • AH
    ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF BIG BEND- SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TECAS AT SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SS
    SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
2
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
3
University of Texas At San Antonio Alumni Association

To engage our alumni in activities that will advance utsa as a top-tier institution. our focus is to deliver value-added services and events where our alumni can connect with each other, with current students and/or with the university. we…

4
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
5
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
6
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
9
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
10
Free Trade Alliance San Antonio

To develop and enhance the international trade-related economic development of the san antonio area through foreign investment, trade development, and advocacy.

11
Southwest Winners Foundation Inc

The mission of Southwest Winners Foundation is to provide an adaptive and effective learning environment that prepares students for success in the workplace and/or college.

Education
12
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Orchestras of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Brackenridge Park Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $35,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient — $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSEUM OF BIG BEND- SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERISTY — $14,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF BIG BEND- SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERISTYSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL CENTER OPERATING FUND — $14,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL CENTER OPERATING FUNDBAMC FISHER HOUSE — $13,500 · OtherBAMC FISHER HOUSEUTSA DEAN'S FUND FOR THE COLLEGE OF SCIENCES — $12,000 · OtherUTSA DEAN'S FUND FOR THE COLLEGE OF SCIENCESCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC — $8,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION — $8,000 · OtherTHE TOBIN CENTER — $6,500 · OtherACORN SCHOOL — $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO — $6,000 · OtherYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $6,000 · Other+10 more — $33,000 · Other+10 moreUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $69,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO…ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationALAMO HEIG…Trinity University — $4,000 · EducationTrinity Un…Witte Museum — $13,500 · Arts & CultureBrackenridge Park Conservancy — $6,000 · Recreation & SportsFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc — $6,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $3,500 · HealthTHE TRANSPLANT ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $2,500 · Health
Other$176,500Philanthropy$69,000Education$29,000Arts & Culture$13,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Human Services$6,000Health$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $69,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWitte Museum — $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBrackenridge Park Conservancy — $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity University — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRANSPLANT ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSYMPHONY SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Witte Museum
  • Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy
  • Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc
  • Who funds YOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO
  • Who funds Trinity University
  • Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE TRANSPLANT ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS
  • Who funds SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992TX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · San Antonio Area Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Pat & Tom Frost Foundation F0731600 · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vaughan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vaughan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vaughan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph