Skip to content
Varrichio Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Varrichio Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$391kCrime & Legal$186kHuman Services$131kHealth$96kInternational$80kEnvironment$49kAnimals$28kHousing & Shelter$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PHILIPS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$60,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
GOLDSTAR STABLES AND SANCTUARY$10,000
TANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$10,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY$10,000
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
DALLAS ARBORETUM$4,500
ALIVE AT LAST$3,500
DAY SPRING ASSISTED LIVING$3,000
TAHOE FUND$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CASA OF COLLIN COUNTY$2,500
OPERATION KINDNESS$2,500
REDEEMED WOMEN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TANZANIAN CHILDRENDS FUND: $1k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 5%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 5%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $1k → 12%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 5%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $2k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $2k → 14%CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
MI
NY
MA
NV
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$997k · 47 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
25

Total granted

$997k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+22%

Still filing today

55%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEnvironmentHealthReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +71%
  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +13%
  • RW
    REDEEMED WOMEN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +287%

Funded once

  • YW
    Youth With Facesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +62%
  • BD
    Broadway Dallas Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +84%
  • RH
    RESCUE HER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +139%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
4
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
5
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
6
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
7
Operation Care International Inc

Operation care international exists to glorify god. in obedience to his will, we connect impoverished children and the homeless to jesus christ providing for their physical needs through god's provision both at home and abroad.

Human Services
8
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
9
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
12
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
32/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PHILIPS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $310,500 · OtherST PHILIPS EPISCOPAL CHURCHRELIANT MISSION INC: $70,000 · OtherRELIANT MISSION INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $40,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $32,500 · OtherDODONA TANZIA HEALTH SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherDAY SPRING ASSISTED LIVING: $26,500 · Other+52 more: $213,361 · Other+52 moreCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $145,000 · Civil RightsCHILDRENS ADVOC…+1 more: $2,500 · Civil RightsTANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $45,000 · InternationalServingHIM Healthcare International Ministries: $8,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $7,500 · InternationalFive Talents USA: $4,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $3,000 · International+2 more: $3,039 · InternationalDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $31,000 · EnvironmentTAHOE FUND: $12,500 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $4,750 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $8,500 · Human ServicesOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $2,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesREDEEMED WOMEN: $18,250 · ReligionTHE DALLAS DREAM TEAM: $3,000 · ReligionApartment Life Inc: $2,000 · ReligionALIVE AT LAST: $14,225 · Crime & Legal
Other$722,861Civil Rights$147,500International$70,539Environment$49,250Human Services$24,500Religion$23,250Crime & Legal$14,225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $145,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $45,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREDEEMED WOMEN: $18,250 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetALIVE AT LAST: $14,225 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetSAMARITAN INN INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $8,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetServingHIM Healthcare International Ministries: $8,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEQUEST: $7,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,111 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYouth With Faces: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBroadway Dallas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFive Talents USA: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS DREAM TEAM: $3,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $2,039 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLENBROOK FIREWORKS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetORDER OF CHRISTIAN WORKERS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetApartment Life Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIMPLY GRACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS AUXILIARY TO THE CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION-TEXAS CHAPTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShe Is Safe Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Carolina Aquarium: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT STREET VET: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEARLS OF PROMISE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLANO POLICE ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds REDEEMED WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE AT LAST ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN INN INC ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ServingHIM Healthcare International Ministries ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds EQUEST ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds MINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth With Faces ↗
  • Who funds Broadway Dallas Inc ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Five Talents USA ↗
  • Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS DREAM TEAM ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…The Dallas FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…Hattie Mae Lesley Fou…W P & Bulah Luse Foun…Craig and Kathryn Hal…Hillcrest FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…Dallas Jewish Communi…United Way WorldwideRaymond James Charita…Celanese Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX30.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hattie Mae Lesley Foundation Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Celanese Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Varrichio Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Varrichio Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Varrichio Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home