· Public charity
Variety - the Childrens Charity of Southern California Tent 25
Variety is dedicated to inspiring hope, enriching lives and building a better future for the children of Southern California.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of VARIETY - THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENT 25’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $186,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $448,615 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $262,365 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $128k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $128,000 |
| Concerned Black Men of LA | $25,000 |
| SURFER HEALING FOUNDATION | $13,500 |
| HOPES NEST | $12,250 |
| LOLLIPOP THEATER NETWORK | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $558k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VBVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +112%
- CBCONCERNED BLACK MEN OF LOS ANGELES INC6× · 2019–2024 · $158k · revenue +168% · 59% of their budget
- VDVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- TMTHE MENIFEE VALLEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $47k · revenue +152%
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INCone grant, 2017 · $37k · revenue -10%
- 1L1979 LEGACY CORPgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…
Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…
The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…
The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.
Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
Preparing the children of watts-willowbrook, compton, and south los angeles to succeed and thereby strengthen our community's future
The guidance center provides comprehensive mental health treatment to our community's most disadvantaged children and their families struggling with mental illness and abuse, leading them toward a positive and productive future.
To turn possibilities into achievements for children with visual impairment and their families. we envision a world where all children with visual impairment have equal access to healthcare,education, and support to be successful in life.
Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa Esperanza Services and the most unlike its peers is Special Equestrian Riding Therapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds CONCERNED BLACK MEN OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds SUCCESS THROUGH EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LOLLIPOP THEATER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Burn Institute ↗
- Who funds JEFFREY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIDE ON LA RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds LAS FLORISTAS INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
- Who funds PF Bresee Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MENIFEE VALLEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
- Who funds Special Equestrian Riding Therapy ↗
- Who funds Children Today Inc ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS ↗
- Who funds INGLEWOOD BASEBALL FUND ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY ARTS ↗
- Who funds SEANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS ENJOY EXERCISE NOW ↗
- Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗
- Who funds HELP FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds A WALK ON WATER INC ↗
- Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Optimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc ↗
- Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRUST FUND OF VOLUNTEER LEAGUE OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Henry L Guenther Foundation · The Green Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Carl E Wynn Foundation · Lon V Smith Foundation · The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Variety - the Childrens Charity of Southern California Tent 25 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.