Skip to content

· Private foundation

Van Nuys Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$131kHuman Services$118kEducation$83kHealth$37kAnimals$36kArts & Culture$32kFood & Nutrition$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METHACTON SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,000
SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,000
REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER$6,000
MIDDLECREEK AREA COMMUNITY YMCA$6,000
THE YMCA$4,000
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$4,000
RANDOM CANYON RIDING PROGRAM INC$4,000
THE JARED BOX PROJECT$3,000
METHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
STRAWBERRY FIELDS INCORPORATED$3,000
KIDSGROVE INC$3,000
SELINSGROVE AREA RECREATION INC$3,000
WORCESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION$2,000
SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%RED CORNER BENEFIT: $2k → 11%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%RED CORNER BENEFIT: $2k → 11%THE YMCA: $4k → 14%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%RED CORNER BENEFIT: $2k → 11%THE YMCA: $4k → 14%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%RED CORNER BENEFIT: $2k → 11%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%THE YMCA: $4k → 14%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%THE YMCA: $4k → 14%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $6k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $4k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $4k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $4k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $3k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $3k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $2k → 10%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$451k · 30 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$451k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-1%

Still filing today

67%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RE
    REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +188%
  • ME
    METHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +24%
  • SA
    SELINSGROVE AREA RECREATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF SACRED HEART HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • VT
    Variety the Childrens Charity
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -1%
  • TC
    TRINITY COUNTRY NURSERY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Susquehanna County Recreation Center

Provide clean safe fun and community oriented recreational opportunities to the residents of the greater susquehanna county area.

Recreation & Sports
2
Pocono Wildlife Rehabilitation Center

To care for injured and orphaned wild animals, rehabilitate them and release them into the appropriate habitat.

Animals
3
Wyoming County Historical Society

To make historical information about wyoming county, pa available to the public

—
4
Delaware County Historical Society

Acquire and preserve property and information of historic value and/or interest concerning delaware county, pennsylvania. the society also operates a research library and museum.

Arts & Culture
5
Shippensburg Historical Society Inc

Founded in 1945, the shippensburg historical society is a non-profit membership organizaiton dedicated to the collecting, preserving, and sharing the rich history of shippensburg, pennsylvania and the surronding area.

—
6
Wayne County Historical Society

Preserve historical artifacts and provide education of wayne county pennsylvania

—
7
Schwenkfelder Library & Heritage Center

Maintenance of a fully equipped library and activities allied thereto, as a memorial to caspar schwenckfeld.

Education
8
Mercer County Historical Society Inc

The mission of the mercer county historical society is to collect and preserve artifacts, manuscripts, published materials and records relating to mercer county's pre-history and history and use these to increase public awareness and…

—
9
Sedgwick County Zoological Society Inc

The sedgwick county zoological society is dedicated to inspiring respect and conservation of wildlife and wild places through our commitment to providing excellent care and welfare for our animals, building connections between our guests…

Animals
10
Saucon Valley Community Center

A community center which provides a meeting place and programs for the recreation and social welfare of all age groups in the community.

—
11
Warren Library Association

The mission of the warren library association is to provide all citizens in its service area access to library materials and information services which address the needs and expand the aspirations of the community for formal and lifelong…

—
12
Sedgwick County Zoological Foundation

To serve as a fundraising and support organization for the sedgwick county zoological society, inc.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Giving Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Worcester Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $42,000 · OtherSELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTWEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $33,000 · OtherWEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATIONRANDOM CANYON RIDING PROGRAM INC: $32,000 · OtherRANDOM CANYON RIDING PROGRAM INCALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $22,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHKIDSGROVE INC: $18,000 · OtherKIDSGROVE INCMethacton School District: $16,000 · OtherMethacton School DistrictEASTERN SNYDER COUNTY REGIONAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherEASTERN SNYDER COUNTY REGIONAL RECREATION ASSOCIATIONGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $14,000 · Other+18 more: $86,000 · Other+18 moreREGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $28,000 · Human ServicesREGIONAL ENGAGE…YMCA OF THE ROSES: $16,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROS…SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $14,000 · Human ServicesSWEET GRACE MIN…Red Corner Benefit Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesRed Corner Bene…METHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 · EducationMETHACTON EDUC…SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC: $21,500 · EducationSNYDER COUNTY …SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UN…CENTRE COUNTY PAWS INC: $14,500 · AnimalsFAR POINT ANIMAL RESCUE: $13,500 · AnimalsSELINSGROVE AREA RECREATION INC: $22,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE JARED BOX PROJECT: $12,000 · HealthSTRAWBERRY FIELDS INC: $7,000 · HealthThe Hummels Wharf Fire Company Incorporated: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$278,000Human Services$65,000Education$62,500Animals$28,000Recreation & Sports$22,000Health$19,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $33,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetREGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $28,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetMETHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSELINSGROVE AREA RECREATION INC: $22,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetSNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC: $21,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY PAWS INC: $14,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $14,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAR POINT ANIMAL RESCUE: $13,500 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JARED BOX PROJECT: $12,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetThe Hummels Wharf Fire Company Incorporated: $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPETER WENTZ FARMSTEAD SOCIETY: $8,250 over 5y, 12% of budgetWORCESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,250 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetAppalachia Horse Help & Rescue Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetTHE WARD FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 245 INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetARTSQUEST: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAWBERRY FIELDS INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEAN F HOGAN SR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetVariety the Childrens Charity: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST SNYDER RECREATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds METHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SELINSGROVE AREA RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COUNTY PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA ↗
  • Who funds FAR POINT ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE JARED BOX PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds The Hummels Wharf Fire Company Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds PETER WENTZ FARMSTEAD SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Appalachia Horse Help & Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 245 INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSQUEST ↗
  • Who funds Red Corner Benefit Inc ↗
  • Who funds STRAWBERRY FIELDS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEAN F HOGAN SR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Variety the Childrens Charity ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial TrustPA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · Community Giving Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Guyer Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Van Nuys Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Van Nuys Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Van Nuys Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Van Nuys Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Van Nuys’ filings →

    More from the funding graph