Skip to content
Valorus at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Valorus

VALORUS (valor) is a california-based, national nonprofit organization with a mission to prevent and end sexual violence by advancing equity and eradicating oppression.

$330k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MCrime & Legal$1.2MHealth$614kEmployment$151kCivil Rights$150kReligion$125kCommunity Improvement$77kPhilanthropy$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $204k
$19,922
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIDERES CAMPESINAS$80,038
PARTNERS AGAINST VIOLENCE$68,563
SURE HELPLINE CRISIS CENTER$55,599
PREVAIL$21,320
WEAVE INC$20,243
WOMEN'S CENTER HIGH DESERT$19,922
RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER$19,762
VALLEY OASIS$19,475
COMMUNITY VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS$9,822
RCS FRESNO$8,793
LASSEN FAMILY SERVICES$6,118
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PREVAIL: $21k → 8%DEAFHOPE: $50k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER YOUTH FAMILY SVCS: $42k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $10k → 13%BRIGHT HORIZONS FOSTER FAMILY: $43k → 14%KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%LASSEN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 17%TAPESTRY FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 18%WOMEN'S CENTER HIGH DESERT: $90k → 18%WOMENSV: $23k → 8%ALAMEDA COUNTY DA'S OFFICE: $42k → 10%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $50k → 11%EL CONCILIO: $25k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $9k → 13%EMPOWER YOLO: $15k → 16%LASSEN FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 17%WOMEN'S CENTER HIGH DESERT: $23k → 18%PREVAIL: $24k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $7k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE: $40k → 14%LASSEN FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 17%WOMEN'S CENTER HIGH DESERT: $20k → 18%RESILIENCY CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $10k → 19%WOMEN'S CENTER YOUTH FAMILY SVCS: $21k → 12%LASSEN FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 17%WOMEN'S CENTER HIGH DESERT: $19k → 18%WOMEN'S CENTER YOUTH FAMILY SVCS: $15k → 12%LASSEN FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 17%WOMEN'S CENTER HIGH DESERT: $17k → 18%JENESSE CENTER INC: $50k → 14%INNER CIRCLE FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $29k → 12%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN INC: $75k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $26k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
55

Total granted

$1.8M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+26%

Still filing today

93%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SURE HELPLINE CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $233k · revenue +14%
  • Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $185k · revenue +87%
  • AC
    ARC California
    3× · 2022–2024 · $155k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • Empower Yolo Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $90k · revenue -12%
  • LA
    Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abusegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +164%
  • CA
    Court Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
2
San Francisco Women Against Rape

San Francisco Women Against Rape is a community-based rape crisis center. We provide support to sexual assault survivors, their family members, significant others, and friends. We use education as a tool of prevention. Direct services…

—
3
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
4
Community Violence Solutions

CVS is dedicated to working to end sexual assault and family violence through prevention, crisis services, and treatment.

Health
5
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
6
Crime Victim Advocacy Center of St Louis

Crime victim advocacy center's mission is to pursue a definition of justice which includes the victim. the center serves victims of all types of crime by providing a wide range of services such as counseling, advocacy, and offering…

—
7
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
8
Cora Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse

Coras mission is to provide safety, support and healing for individuals who experience abuse in an intimate relationship, and educate the community to break the cycle of domestic violence. coras vision is a society where intimate partners…

—
9
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
10
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
11
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
12
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacramento Regional Family Justice Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/64
Grantees still filing
45/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Partners Against Violence Inc: $244,276 · OtherPartners Against Violence IncSURE HELPLINE CENTER: $233,272 · OtherSURE HELPLINE CENTERWEAVE INC: $163,012 · OtherWEAVE INCARC California: $155,178 · OtherARC CaliforniaLos Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse: $75,000 · OtherEL REFUGIO DE LA OVEJA: $75,000 · OtherCANDID: $66,323 · Other+17 more: $550,470 · Other+17 moreWOMEN'S CENTER-HIGH DESERT INC: $170,062 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER-HIGH DESERT INCPREVAIL CA: $123,625 · Human ServicesPREVAIL CAAntelope Valley Domestic Violence Council: $91,779 · Human ServicesAntelope Valley Domestic Violence…Empower Yolo Inc: $90,000 · Human ServicesEmpower Yolo IncTAPESTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTAPESTRY FAMILY SERVICES INCWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesKOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesLICENSE TO FREEDOM: $50,000 · Human ServicesDEAFHOPE: $50,000 · Human ServicesInner Circle Foster Family Agency Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesJenesse Center Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesBright Horizons Foster Family Agency: $42,531 · Human ServicesALAMEDA COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $42,441 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $40,000 · Human Services+9 more: $211,728 · Human Services+9 moreRIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $98,285 · HealthRIVERSIDE A…Rape Counseling Services of Fresno: $81,981 · HealthRape Counse…Standing Together to End Sexual Assault: $80,105 · HealthStanding To…CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $64,489 · HealthCENTER FOR …Valley Community Counseling Service: $40,055 · HealthValley Comm…EAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER: $30,045 · HealthEAST LOS AN…PLUMAS CRISIS INTERVENTION AND RESOURCE CENTER: $18,665 · HealthOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $184,973 · EmploymentBuilding Skills Partnership: $46,560 · EmploymentCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties: $75,000 · Civil RightsTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $50,000 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $49,995 · Civil RightsJUSTICE AT LAST INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY INC: $14,549 · Civil RightsPROJECT PEACEMAKERS INC: $65,000 · Crime & LegalWAYMAKERS: $40,000 · Crime & LegalCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $37,288 · Crime & LegalSOLANO ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE: $30,000 · Crime & LegalEMPOWER TEHAMA: $20,000 · Crime & LegalCALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $50,000 · Community ImprovementSACRAMENTO REGIONAL FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $49,780 · Community ImprovementCenter for a Non Violent Community: $26,545 · Community Improvement
Other$1,562,531Human Services$1,187,166Health$413,625Employment$231,533Civil Rights$229,544Crime & Legal$212,288Community Improvement$126,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPartners Against Violence Inc: $244,276 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetSURE HELPLINE CENTER: $233,272 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $184,973 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER-HIGH DESERT INC: $170,062 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetWEAVE INC: $163,012 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetARC California: $155,178 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetPREVAIL CA: $123,625 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetRIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $98,285 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetAntelope Valley Domestic Violence Council: $91,779 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc: $90,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRape Counseling Services of Fresno: $81,981 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetStanding Together to End Sexual Assault: $80,105 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetLos Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties: $75,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetTAPESTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCANDID: $66,323 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT PEACEMAKERS INC: $65,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $64,489 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLICENSE TO FREEDOM: $50,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEAFHOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetInner Circle Foster Family Agency Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJenesse Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $49,995 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSACRAMENTO REGIONAL FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $49,780 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFosterHope Sacramento: $49,007 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetVERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION: $48,429 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBuilding Skills Partnership: $46,560 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBright Horizons Foster Family Agency: $42,531 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $42,441 over 1y, 16% of budgetValley Community Counseling Service: $40,055 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAO FAMILY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWAYMAKERS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUSTICE AT LAST INC: $40,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $37,288 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLASSEN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $35,233 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN AGAINST RAPE: $35,169 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $33,994 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER: $30,045 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $29,872 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $28,665 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCenter for a Non Violent Community: $26,545 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Women's Foundation of…California Physicians…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Partnershi…Calico CenterThe California Wellne…California Foundation…In-N-Out Burgers Foun…The California Endowm…East Bay Community Fo…Weingart FoundationSierra Health Foundat…
Women's Foundation of CaliforniaCA54× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Women's Foundation of California · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Partnership to End Domestic Violence · Calico Center · The California Wellness Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · The California Endowment · East Bay Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valorus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valorus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Valorus?

    Find your warmest path to Valorus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Valorus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home