Skip to content

· Private foundation

Valla Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$168kAnimals$91kArts & Culture$70kFood & Nutrition$64kHuman Services$47kHousing & Shelter$33kYouth Development$24kCommunity Improvement$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT BRAGG FOOD BANK$6,000
SFCASA$5,000
MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND$5,000
THE WILDCAT SANCTUARY$5,000
REDWOOD COAST SENIORS$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS TEAM$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE SF PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
SACRED HEART CATHEDRAL PIRO SCHOLAR PROGRAM$2,000
TNDC AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM$2,000
NO DOG LEFT BEHIND$2,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$2,000
SAINT IGNATIUS ARRUPE FUNDS$2,000
SAINT ANTHONY'S$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE HEALDSBURG LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $3k → 11%MY NEW RED SHOES: $1k → 7%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 18%MY NEW RED SHOES: $1k → 7%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 18%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 18%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 18%REACH FOR HOME: $11k → 9%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 18%REACH FOR HOME: $6k → 9%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $4k → 18%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $4k → 18%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $4k → 18%MENDOCINO COAST CHILDREN'S FUND: $3k → 18%REACH FOR HOME: $1k → 9%REDWOOD COAST SENIORS: $3k → 18%PARENTS & FRIENDS: $1k → 18%PARENTS & FRIENDS: $1k → 18%AT THE CROSSROADS: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 45 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
17

Total granted

$530k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+5%

Still filing today

47%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    Mendocino Food and Nutrition Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +295%
  • MC
    MENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +56%
  • RF
    REACH FOR HOME
    4× · 2017–2022 · $23k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • DA
    DEMARILLAC ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • AT
    AT THE CROSSROADS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -46%
  • QO
    QUIET OAKS
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redwood Coast Humane Society

Prevention of pet abuse, neglect, and over-population by providing temporary and permanent homes for abandoned cats and dogs and providing neutering and spaying services for these animals.

Animals
2
Friends and Foundation of the San Francisco Public Library

See Schedule OFriends supports the free public libraries of San Francisco. We provide funding and conduct advocacy and outreach to ensure that all people have equal access to the information, resources and support that our libraries…

Education
3
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
4
Northern California Animal Rescue Friends

We work in cooperation with humane organizations shelters and other groups interested in animal rescue. We rescue domestic animals and place them in nurturing foster homes. All animals are evaluated altered and vaccinated prior to…

Animals
5
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
6
Northern California Sled Dog Rescue

Northern California Sled Dog Rescue (NORSLED) is an all volunteer non-profit group dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, fostering and finding new homes for unwanted, abused and abandoned siberian huskies, alaskan malamutes, samoyeds and…

Animals
7
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals
8
Pets Lifeline Inc

Pets Lifeline is dedicated to protecting and improving the lives of cats and dogs in need in Sonoma Valley through sheltering and adoption, humane education, and community programs.

Animals
9
Santa Cruz Spca and Humane Society

The Santa Cruz SPCA provides safe harbor for animals in need and promotes an active humane community through adoption, advocacy, and education.

Animals
10
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
11
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
12
The Mendocino Community Library Inc

To operate a community library for information retrieval and enjoyment by the general public.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is At the Crossroads; the most unlike its peers is Bad Rap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mendocino Food and Nutrition Inc: $40,000 · OtherMendocino Food and Nutrition IncAMERICAN SCORES: $30,000 · OtherAMERICAN SCORESIMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMY: $20,500 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMYSACRED HEART CATHEDRAL PIRO SCHOLAR PROGRAM: $19,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CATHEDRAL PIRO SCHOLAR PROGRAMTNDC AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM: $18,000 · OtherTNDC AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMSFCASA: $15,000 · OtherDEMARILLAC ACADEMY: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE SF PUBLIC LIBRARY: $15,000 · OtherANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS TEAM: $12,100 · OtherSFSU DEAN'S FUND GUARDIAN SCHOLARS: $12,000 · OtherSAINT IGNATIUS ARRUPE FUNDS: $12,000 · OtherCOTS: $11,000 · Other+30 more: $101,250 · Other+30 more826 NEW ORLEANS: $40,000 · Education826 NEW ORLEANS826 National Inc: $18,000 · Education826 National Inc10000 DEGREES: $9,000 · Education10000 DEGREESGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationGEORGIAN COURT U…HEALDSBURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationHEALDSBURG EDUCA…+2 more: $1,500 · EducationMENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND: $38,000 · Human ServicesMENDOCINO COAST…REACH FOR HOME: $23,000 · Human ServicesREACH FOR HOMEAT THE CROSSROADS: $10,000 · Human ServicesAT THE CROSSROA…QUIET OAKS: $3,000 · Human Services+3 more: $6,500 · Human Services+3 moreTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $18,900 · AnimalsTHE WILDCAT …No Dog Left Behind: $16,250 · AnimalsNo Dog Left …Mendocino Coast Humane Society: $11,250 · AnimalsMendocino Co…THE BOND BETWEEN: $10,100 · AnimalsTHE BOND BET…Humane Society for Inland Mendocino County: $6,750 · AnimalsHumane Socie…+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $12,400 · Food & NutritionSAINT ANTHONYS INC: $11,000 · EnvironmentTHE NATIONAL LOON CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentCORAZON INC: $4,000 · International
Other$320,850Education$84,500Human Services$80,500Animals$64,250Food & Nutrition$12,400Environment$12,000International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget826 NEW ORLEANS: $40,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetMendocino Food and Nutrition Inc: $40,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND: $38,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetREACH FOR HOME: $23,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $18,900 over 7y, 0.1% of budget826 National Inc: $18,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNo Dog Left Behind: $16,250 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $12,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMendocino Coast Humane Society: $11,250 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSAINT ANTHONYS INC: $11,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BOND BETWEEN: $10,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAT THE CROSSROADS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget10000 DEGREES: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGEYSERVILLE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetHEALDSBURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetHumane Society for Inland Mendocino County: $6,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HEALDSBURG LIBRARY: $6,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetCORAZON INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetQUIET OAKS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRedwood Coast Seniors Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMBOLDEN CHANGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetParents & Friends Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAMSEY COUNTY LIBRARY FRIENDS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSonoma County Library Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFree Bookmobile: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL LOON CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAD RAP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget826 Valencia: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLa Casa de las Madres: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 826 NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds Mendocino Food and Nutrition Inc ↗
  • Who funds MENDOCINO COAST CHILDRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDCAT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds 826 National Inc ↗
  • Who funds No Dog Left Behind ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Mendocino Coast Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANTHONYS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOND BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds AT THE CROSSROADS ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEYSERVILLE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALDSBURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society for Inland Mendocino County ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HEALDSBURG LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds CORAZON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Mendocino CountyCA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Mendocino County · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valla Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valla Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Georgian Court University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Valla Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Valla Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valla Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph