How much did V KELLY FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of V KELLY FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $4k
$10k–50k2 grants · $42k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE WATSON INSTITUTE$27,243
ST ANTHONY SCHOOL PROGRAMS$15,000
PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE COALITIONS$3,974

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$125k · 5 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$125k

$232k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%

+23%

Still filing today

60%

52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DM
DON MILLS ACHIEVEMENT CENTER
2× · 2018–2020 · $33k
BS
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
2× · 2019–2022 · $29k
SA
ST ANTHONY SCHOOL PROGRAMS
2× · 2017–2024 · $25k

Funded once

MM
MCGUIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -7%
CC
CREATIVE CITIZENS STUDIOS
one grant, 2020 · $15k
SF
STONEYBROOK FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Autism Services Inc

Operates group homes for autistic adults and children. provides a myriad of services for autistic individuals.

—

Abilities Inc

The mission of Abilities Inc is to increase the employment of people with disabilities by providing assessments, skills training, job placement and job retention.

—

Human Technologies Corporation

Creating employment for people with disabilities.

Employment

Vista Adult Services Organization

To provide job support and behavioral care for adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.

Health

The Arc of Pennsylvania

The arc of pennsylvania works to include all children and adults with intellectual and development disabilities in every community and provide advocacy and resources to these citizens and their families.

—

Arc Industries Inc of Franklin County

Training and employment services for developmentally disabled adults.

—

The Viscardi Center Inc

Empowering people with disabilities to be active, independent, and self-sufficient participants in our society. Through education, training, leadership & example we seek to provide the highest quality services and to influence national…

Human Services

The Institutes of Applied Human Dynamics

We are committed to positively impact the lives of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and their families. our focus is to understand and respect each person's unique strengths, qualities and dreams finding ways to…

Human Services

Skills of Central Pennsylvania Inc

Skills' administers a broad range of human service programs which provide mental health and intellectual disabilities programs to clients within various counties of the commonwealth of pa

Human Services

Workabilities Inc

The organization's mission is to support people with developmental disabilities in acquiring the skills they need to participate in the community by providing the necessary education and training to these individuals to allow them to…

Employment

Milestones Services Inc

To enable persons with developmental disabilities to achieve their maximum potential.

Education

Developing Potential Inc

Operation of a Facility for training the severely handicapped to increase thier earning capabilities and to increase opportunities for health and wellness.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Don Mills Achievement Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

9/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$171,235Human Services$109,987Health$27,799Education$27,552International$16,763Philanthropy$15,500Arts & Culture$10,000Employment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Staunton Farm Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat · Pittsburgh Penguins Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Hillman Family Foundations · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation V KELLY FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DON MILLS ACHIEVEMENT CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 251399598 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DON MILLS ACHIEVEMENT CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to V Kelly for Handicapped Children?

Find your warmest path to V Kelly for Handicapped Children through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

V KELLY FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to V Kelly for Handicapped Children?

More from the funding graph

V KELLY FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to V Kelly for Handicapped Children?

More from the funding graph