Skip to content
Uva Prince William Medical Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Uva Prince William Medical Center

Our mission transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond.

$330k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$390kHuman Services$180kEducation$110kCommunity Improvement$101kYouth Development$91kArts & Culture$72kEmployment$70kReligion$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $171,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $329,649 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $158,349 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $158k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$248M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON$35,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI)$25,000
HISTORIC MANASSAS INC$25,000
NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$25,000
CFH INC$12,500
FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC$10,000
HOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$7,500
FAUQUIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $167k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%PERSONAL CARE SERVICES: $30k → 15%PERSONAL CARE SERVICES: $23k → 15%PERSONAL CARE SERVICES: $18k → 15%NORTHERN VIRGINIA VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 7%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $10k → 6%SERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS: $10k → 7%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 6%CITY OF MANASSAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 9%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Uva Prince William Medical Center’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Uva Prince William Medical Centerlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$784k · 15 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$784k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+2%

Still filing today

93%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $154k · revenue +288%
  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +37%
  • TS
    THE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • PI
    PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2024 · $29k · revenue +2%
  • HO
    HISPANIC ORGANIZATION FOR LEADERSHIP AND ACTION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · 35% of their budget
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
2
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
3
Virginia Coalition for Progressive Values

To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity Virginia

Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development

Housing & Shelter
5
Voluntary Action Center of the Prince William Area

The Voluntary Action Center recruits and places volunteers in the community, provides training and consultation services for government agencies and manages Community services so ordered by the PWC Courts

—
6
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
7
Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association

Collaborating with our members and stakeholders, vhha works to ensure the sustainability of virginia's health care system and improve the health of all virginians.

—
8
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
9
Virginia Association of Health Plans

Provide Virginia health plans a voice in promoting quality and affordable healthcare through advocacy, communication, education, and research.

—
10
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
11
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
12
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Incorporated of Virginia; the most unlike its peers is Hireground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
21/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $154,065 · OtherUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONNAMI Prince William: $45,000 · OtherNAMI Prince WilliamCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON INC: $35,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON …Prince William Area Free Clinic Inc: $30,000 · OtherPrince William Area Free Clinic IncPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $28,500 · OtherPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIAYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $40,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC+14 more: $120,325 · Other+14 moreUVA CATON MERCHANT HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING: $71,829 · Human ServicesUVA CATON MERCHAN…NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN VIRGINIA…Capital Hospice: $10,000 · Human ServicesCapital HospiceServe Our Willing Warriors: $10,000 · Human ServicesServe Our Willing…Code of Support Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesCode of Support F…CITY OF MANASSAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN VIRGINIA VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Human ServicesGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $80,470 · EducationGEORGE MASON …FUTURE KINGS INC: $31,000 · EducationFUTURE KINGS …Prince William County Public Schools Education Fou: $14,750 · EducationPrince Willia…PRINCE WILLIAM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $51,408 · Community ImprovementPRINCE WI…HISPANIC ORGANIZATION FOR LEADERSHIP AND ACTION INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC …CFH Inc: $18,500 · Community ImprovementCFH IncAmerican Heart Association Inc: $59,550 · HealthAmerican …THE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · HealthTHE CHRIS…BRAIN INJURY SERVICES: $10,000 · HealthBRAIN INJ…THE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC: $60,393 · PhilanthropyPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyHistoric Manassas Inc: $37,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF GREATER MANASSAS PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY INC: $34,593 · Arts & Culture
Other$452,890Human Services$166,829Education$126,220Community Improvement$94,908Health$91,550Philanthropy$80,393Arts & Culture$72,093

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $154,065 over 3y, 19% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $80,470 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUVA CATON MERCHANT HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING: $71,829 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC: $60,393 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $59,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCE WILLIAM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $51,408 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI Prince William: $45,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Manassas Inc: $37,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF GREATER MANASSAS PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY INC: $34,593 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFUTURE KINGS INC: $31,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetPrince William Area Free Clinic Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $28,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC ORGANIZATION FOR LEADERSHIP AND ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCFH Inc: $18,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPrince William County Public Schools Education Fou: $14,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $10,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCapital Hospice: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN INJURY SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIREGROUND: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA CHILDRENS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetServe Our Willing Warriors: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCode of Support Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY OF MANASSAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetLEAD VIRGINIA: $7,725 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetLiteracy Volunteers of America - PW Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetACTION IN COMMUNITY THROUGH SERVICE OF PRINCE WILLIAM: $6,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAUQUIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6,300 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sentara HealthThe Human Services Al…Potomac Health Founda…The Community Foundat…United Way of the Nat…Dominion Energy Chari…Community Foundation …Philip L Graham Fund …America's CharitiesNorthern Virginia Foo…Fauquier Health Found…Northern Virginia Hea…
Sentara HealthVA31.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sentara Health · The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William Inc · Potomac Health Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · America's Charities · Northern Virginia Food Rescue · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Northern Virginia Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uva Prince William Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uva Prince William Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Capital Hospice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Uva Prince William Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home