· Public charity
The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William Inc
The mission of The Alliance is to be the catalyst for greater partnerships and collaboration among its network of human service organizations, the faith community, other community organizations, and interested citizens to enhance the lives of the people they support.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Woodbridge First Church of the Nazarene (Woodbridge Iglesia Del Nazareno) | $225,000 |
| St Francis of Assisi Catholic Church | $175,000 |
| George Mason University | $152,013 |
| Edu-Futuro | $150,000 |
| Greater Prince William Community Health Center Inc | $147,797 |
| Centro De Apoyo Familiar | $132,493 |
| Prince William County Community Foundation Inc | $128,920 |
| The House Inc | $125,000 |
| Blue Ribbon Results Child Care Center Inc | $108,805 |
| Action in Community Through Service (ACTS) | $104,264 |
| Northern Virginia Family Service | $92,377 |
| Northern Virginia Veterans Association | $91,050 |
| The Women's Center | $91,000 |
| Hire Ground | $90,000 |
| Tenant and Workers United | $89,805 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNew Creatures In Christ Ministries Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +560%
- EEDU-FUTURO4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +77%
- SCSTREETLIGHT COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES4× · 2021–2024 · $745k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- WWWOODBRIDGE WORKERS COMMITTEEone grant, 2023 · $36k
- PSPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +93%
- SOSHEPHERD OF THE HILLS LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.
The mission of transitions family violence services (tfvs) is to build safe and healthy families on the virginia peninsula by providing services to adult and child victims of domestic violence and human trafficking. we work to increase…
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
Novaco helps homeless victims of domestic abuse become healthy, secure and self-sufficient through community collaboration to provide housing, education, childcare, counseling, mentoring and financial management.
The mission of Virginia Legal Aid Society is to resolve serious legal problems of low-income people, promote economic and family stability, reduce poverty through effective legal assistance, and to champion equal justice.
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.
New Virginia Majority is a grassroots organization that works with low income people in local communities through leadership development, trainings and workshops, issue education and advocacy.
Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…
The Organization provides various types of temporary housing assistance and life-skills training to homeless families with children.
The organization's mission is to: 1) provide supportive and affordable housing to women and families, promoting safety, stability, and dignity. 2) operate food security programs to reduce hunger and support economic empowerment for women…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathway Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kuma Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Creatures In Christ Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds EDU-FUTURO ↗
- Who funds KUMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STREETLIGHT COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ACTION IN COMMUNITY THROUGH SERVICE OF PRINCE WILLIAM ↗
- Who funds HIREGROUND ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM/INSIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds Prince William Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED ↗
- Who funds First Home Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds Blue Ribbon Results Child Care Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Women's Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA VETERANS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FORMED FAMILIES FORWARD ↗
- Who funds Good News Community Kitchen ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds DEBRE MEDHANIT EYESUS ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHIDO ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOOD CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds BRAWS BRINGING RESOURCES TO AID WOMEN'S SHELTERS ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA WOMEN AND FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASA CHILDRENS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA ScriptsCentral ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Potomac Health Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Sentara Health · Uva Prince William Medical Center · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Northern Virginia Food Rescue · Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · Act for Alexandria · Capital Area Food Bank Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.