Skip to content

· Private foundation

Utopia Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$560k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.4MInternational$310kSocial Science$205kHealth$140kEnvironment$125kArts & Culture$116kCrime & Legal$40kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE$280,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION$135,000
101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY$25,000
THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM$25,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$20,000
VASSAR COLLEGE$20,000
THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL$10,000
122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION$5,000
ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $125k → 8%STANFORD GSB: $35k → 8%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%VASSAR COLLEGE: $20k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION: $135k → 9%101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY: $25k → 17%ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION: $10k → 20%THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 14%THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $20k → 9%THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM: $25k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $280k → 6%HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $25k → 8%STANFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL: $25k → 8%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%VASSAR COLLEGE: $15k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION: $125k → 9%101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY: $10k → 17%THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 14%THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $20k → 9%THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM: $15k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $125k → 6%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $20k → 8%STANFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL: $25k → 8%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%VASSAR COLLEGE: $15k → 9%THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $15k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $75k → 6%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $20k → 8%STANFORD GSB: $15k → 8%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%VASSAR COLLEGE: $15k → 9%THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $15k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $50k → 6%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $20k → 8%STANFORD GSB: $15k → 8%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%VASSAR COLLEGE: $15k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $50k → 6%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $50k → 6%MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $50k → 6%COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $25k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25k → 17%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25k → 17%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 18 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$2.3M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+33%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $705k · revenue +135%
  • MD
    MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $140k · revenue +68%
  • TH
    THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • HG
    HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CL
    COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
New York League of Conservation Voters Education Fund

See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…

Environment
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
12
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Marshall Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Eton College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $705,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION: $310,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATIONHARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $205,000 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOLVASSAR COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGEYALE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · Other+7 more: $153,000 · Other+7 moreWellesley College: $170,000 · EducationWellesley Co…THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationTHE HOTCHKIS…MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · Health101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY: $61,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $10,000 · AnimalsAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementSTREETSQUASH INC: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,773,000Education$270,000Health$140,000Arts & Culture$106,000Animals$65,000Community Improvement$40,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE: $705,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetWellesley College: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $100,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $100,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY: $61,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds 101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utopia Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utopia Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Utopia Fund?

Find your warmest path to Utopia Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Utopia’s filings →

More from the funding graph