Skip to content
Utahns Against Hunger at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Utahns Against Hunger

Our mission is to increase access to food across utah through advocacy, outreach, and education.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$83kHuman Services$74kEducation$8kHousing & Shelter$8kScience & Tech$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $51,421, the rows itemized in this filing. The $53,743 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,322 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$19,539
Median grant
1
States reached
$116k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH MARSHALLESE ASSOCIATION$23,367
COMUNIDADES UNIDAS$19,539
MOSAIC INTER-FAITH MINISTRIES$8,515
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TABITHAS WAY: $8k → 8%CACHE REFUGEE IMMIGRATION CONNECT: $8k → 12%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $20k → 8%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $18k → 8%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $16k → 8%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $15k → 8%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $14k → 8%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $13k → 8%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $5k → 8%MOSAIC INTER-FAITH MINISTRIES: $9k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Salt Lake American

Serving refugees living in Salt Lake County who are unable to communicate in English and do not know how to navigate the system on-call 24-7 provided free a language interpreter and guidance through the system also help during weekday…

Religion
3
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
4
Community Action Services and Food Bank

Community Action Services and Food Bank works to stabilize families and then rebuild their lives. We help meet their basic needs (food, shelter, housing) while providing the long-term solutions needed to rebuild their financial and social…

Human Services
5
Centro Hispano

To empower Latino and Utah families by providing equitable access to information, resources, and educational programs to advance and strengthen the community.

Human Services
6
Skilled Sos

The objective of this organization is to help students and workers make better career, education and finance decisions. With the influx of Afghan refugees in the USA, there is a need for resettlement assistance as well as a unique position…

Employment
7
Friends of Switchpoint Inc

To mobilize individuals and resources to deliver creative solutions to community problems. signifigant activities include operating homeless shelter, community food pantry and a community resource center to help those seeking employment.

Human Services
8
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
9
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
10
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
11
Summit County Resource Center Dba Family & Intercultural Resource Center

The mission of firc is to enhance the quality of life in summit county, colorado by providing social and family services to residents of summit county.

Human Services
12
Central Utah Food Sharing

Food bank - to assist those families who face the dilemma of paying rent or buying food.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mosaic Inter-Faith Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Provo Farmers Market. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Comunidades Unidas: $101,086 · Human ServicesComunidades UnidasMOSAIC INTER-FAITH MINISTRIES: $8,515 · Human ServicesMOSAIC INTER-FAITH MINISTRIESCACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION: $8,200 · Human ServicesCACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTIONNeighborhood House Association: $8,200 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House AssociationTABITHA'S WAY: $8,200 · Human ServicesTABITHA'S WAYUTAH MARSHALLESE ASSOCIATION: $23,367 · OtherUTAH MARSHALLESE ASSOCIATIONSE Utah Assoc of Local Govts: $8,377 · OtherSE Utah Assoc of Local GovtsSan Juan Foundation: $8,200 · OtherSan Juan FoundationPACIFIC ISLAND KNOWLEDGE 2 ACTION RESOURCES INC: $8,200 · OtherPACIFIC ISLAND KNOWLEDGE 2 ACTI…Downtown Alliance Inc: $6,750 · OtherDowntown Alliance IncSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE ASSOCIATION OF THE BEAR RIVER AREA: $6,230 · OtherSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE ASSOCIA…SHARE OUR STRENGTH: $5,500 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $14,082 · HealthProvo Farmers Market: $9,250 · Food & NutritionCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $8,706 · ReligionIRON COUNTY CARE AND SHARE: $8,200 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$134,201Other$66,624Health$14,082Food & Nutrition$9,250Religion$8,706Housing & Shelter$8,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetComunidades Unidas: $101,086 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $14,082 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $8,706 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOSAIC INTER-FAITH MINISTRIES: $8,515 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION: $8,200 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIRON COUNTY CARE AND SHARE: $8,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSan Juan Foundation: $8,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $8,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTABITHA'S WAY: $8,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Alliance Inc: $6,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…Ihc Health Services I…Utah's PromiseThe Community Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Utah's Promise · The Community Foundation of Utah · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utahns Against Hunger funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utahns Against Hunger. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utahns Against Hunger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home