· Public charity
USATransform
To educate and encourage individuals and organizations to advance positive outcomes in American culture.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $1000k
- $250k+16 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Turning Point USA | $2,059,681 |
| Alliance Defending Freedom | $1,200,000 |
| America First Policy Institute | $1,180,119 |
| Cityserve International | $747,100 |
| John K Amanchukwu (IKG Global LLC) | $710,000 |
| 1789 Foundation | $680,000 |
| Valid Vote Inc | $680,000 |
| National Faith Advisory Board Inc | $650,000 |
| First Liberty Institute | $650,000 |
| Turning Point Action | $625,000 |
| Lance Wallnau Ministries Total | $570,000 |
| American Letter Productions LLC | $500,000 |
| Concerned Women for America | $400,000 |
| Faith Wins | $400,000 |
| Tetelestai Ministries Inc | $320,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $631k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of USATransform’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 100% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM4× · 2021–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +52%- TPTURNING POINT USA INC3× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +190%
- FLFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +98%
Funded once
Conservative Partnership Instituteone grant, 2022 · $600k · revenue -5%- SFSHAI FUND INCone grant, 2021 · $315k · revenue -51%
- TTTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $224k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be a state-focused, biblical organization that could tactfully address issues of life, religious freedom, educational opportunity, Gods design, human dignity, free speech, and principled government.
To awaken, educate, and empower believers in Jesus Christ to: Pray for our nation and elected officials regularly; Vote in every local, state, and national election to impact our culture; Engage our hearts in civic education or involvement…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
We inspire and educate biblical citizens, equip statesmen, and serve a national alliance.
Faith and Law's mission is to encourage and equip Christian policymakers to more fully understand the Biblical worldview and its implication in their calling to the public square.
Faith in public life's mission is to advance the moral imperative for a just, inclusive and equitable country that allows each of us to live into our full humanity. we do this by building power and cultures of belongings among diverse…
The liberal patriot (tlp) is a digital newsletter focused on american politics and public policy. tlp aims to provide readers with honest analysis and original commentary to help advance a vital center perspective in american life.
Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.
We are a national ministry dedicated to a focused mission of encouraging, inspiring, and practicing prayer on behalf of our President, Nations Leaders, and our Troops. We also seek to be a catalyst in the development of a robust prayer…
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
We are a nationwide grassroots movement of people who share a love of american democracy and concern for the direction of our existing leadership. we've watched as institutions on the right have been co-opted by bad-faith actors willing to…
Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Policy Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITYSERVE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds RESCUE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE A21 CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION ↗
- Who funds TheSend ↗
- Who funds VALID VOTE INC ↗
- Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
- Who funds LANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Susan B Anthony List Education Fund ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT AWAKENING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Faith Wins ↗
- Who funds TETELESTAI MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SHAI FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY LEADER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds LIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Independent Women's Forum ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The 85 Fund · Strake Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Holecek Charitable Foundation Inc · The Hofshi Foundation · Vandevere Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization USATransform funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.