Skip to content

· Public charity

USA Triathlon

The mission of USA Triathlon of Colorado (USAT) is to grow, inspire, and support the triathlon community.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.7MHuman Services$55kHousing & Shelter$44kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $40,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $169,361 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $129,361 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$28,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
King University$28,000
Gallaudet University$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KIDS TRIATHLON INC: $35k → 14%RACE 4 CHASE - CMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%KIDS TRIATHLON INC: $15k → 14%RACE 4 CHASE - CMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 9%KIDS TRIATHLON: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$598k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
26

Total granted

$1.2M
$570k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+12%

Still filing today

44%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UT
    USA Triathlon Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $932k · revenue +293% · 26% of their budget
  • GU
    GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $62k · revenue +1%
  • CS
    CMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $17k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Indianapolis
    one grant, 2024 · $110k · revenue +12%
  • LS
    LA SALLE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue -5%
  • RW
    ROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
4
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
5
University of Mount Union

The university affirms the institution's mission to prepare students for fulfilling lives, meaningful work and responsible citizenship. the university of mount union offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in a wide array of academic…

Education
6
Trine University

Trine, an internationally recognized private, independent, co-educational institution offers degrees in various programs including engineering, math, science and business.

Education
7
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
8
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
10
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Salle University; the most unlike its peers is Cmak Sandy Hook Memorial Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USA Triathlon Foundation: $932,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA Triathlon Foundation+2 more: $29,750 · Recreation & SportsUniversity of Indianapolis: $110,000 · EducationUniversity of Indianapo…LA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationLA SALLE UNIVERSITYGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $62,000 · EducationGALLAUDET UNIVERSITYROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVER…DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $40,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF …KING UNIVERSITY: $28,000 · EducationKING UNIVERSITYWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationWARREN WILSON COLLEGE+1 more: $10,000 · EducationLittle Leg Unlimited: $38,100 · OtherLittle Leg UnlimitedtriALLYSA: $37,500 · OthertriALLYSAMultisport Performance Institute: $33,119 · OtherMultisport Performance…Streamline Events: $30,000 · OtherStreamline EventsMAJOR LEAGUE TRIATHLON: $28,000 · OtherMAJOR LEAGUE TRIATHLONTRIATHLON GOLD LLC: $27,500 · OtherTRIATHLON GOLD LLCNorthern Kentucky University: $25,000 · OtherNorthern Kentucky Univ…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $22,037 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSI…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…Balanced Art Multisport: $13,650 · Other+11 more: $81,751 · Other+11 moreKids Triathlon Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesCMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyMULTISPORTMADNESS KIDS INC: $11,150 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$961,750Education$380,000Other$356,657Human Services$72,000Philanthropy$35,000Youth Development$11,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSA Triathlon Foundation: $932,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $110,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $62,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKids Triathlon Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKING UNIVERSITY: $28,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATHAN BENDERSON PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $21,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetMULTISPORTMADNESS KIDS INC: $11,150 over 1y, 13% of budgetChicago State Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBAM ENDURANCE: $8,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds USA Triathlon Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Indianapolis ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Kids Triathlon Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KING UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATHAN BENDERSON PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTISPORTMADNESS KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago State Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BAM ENDURANCE ↗
  • Who funds STRIVE TO TRI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization USA Triathlon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from USA Triathlon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on USA Triathlon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph