Skip to content

· Private foundation

Upside Down Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$568kInternational$200kEducation$30kHealth$28kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$592k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPICENTRE CHURCH$100,000
ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA$40,000
JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST$20,000
INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES$13,680
HAVING A HOME$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GABRIELA ZIOLKOWSKI CO MARVELA GOMEZ$10,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$8,000
THRU THE BIBLE$5,000
JEWS FOR JESUS$5,000
BARBARA ALATORRE MISSIONARY$5,000
JENICE SAMPSON MISSIONARY$5,000
AVENUES PREGNANCY CLINIC$3,000
AADAP INC$3,000
HEAVENLY TREASURES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $40k → 12%HAVING A HOME: $10k → 6%CRYSTAL MYERS: $10k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $15k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $30k → 12%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $30k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $100k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLENMISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $25k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $55k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $25k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $48k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $15k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $13k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN: $25k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $47k → 14%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $13k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN: $20k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $19k → 14%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $13k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLENMISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $20k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $16k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHILD CARE MINISTRIES: $11k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $15k → 12%MISSION FLIGHT: $10k → 14%CMTA: $10k → 14%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $10k → 14%GABRIELA ZIOLKOWSKI CO MARVELA GOMEZ: $10k → 14%HEAVENLY TREASURES: $23k → 14%HEAVENLY TREASURES: $17k → 14%AXIAL PROJECT: $15k → 14%SERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $15k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OR
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Upside Down Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 45%.

Upside Down Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 22 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
24

Total granted

$1.1M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

41%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HEAVENLY TREASURES
    5× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +18%
  • TT
    Thru The Bible Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +49%
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • AP
    Axia Project
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0% · 33% of their budget
  • MF
    MISSION FLIGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +156%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
2
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
3
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
4
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
5
ServeNow

Sharing Christ's passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
6
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
7
Destiny Ministries International Inc

Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible

Religion
8
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
9
Verticle Living Ministries

To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by

Religion
10
The Bridge International Consulting Inc

The bridge consulting, inc. has been established to provide support to pastors throughout the world, provide encouragement to pastors and church leaders in the united states of america, teach international pastoral leaders,and mobilize…

Religion
11
Christian Ministries International
—
12
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bible Study Fellowship; the most unlike its peers is Axia Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPICENTRE CHURCH: $296,170 · OtherEPICENTRE CHURCHROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $185,000 · OtherROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINAJASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $115,000 · OtherJASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EASTINTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $103,960 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · Other+32 more: $155,036 · Other+32 moreI PLANTED A SEED INC: $55,000 · ReligionI PLANTED …Thru The Bible Inc: $26,000 · ReligionThru The B…InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $16,000 · ReligionInterVarsi…JESUS USE ME MOVEMENT: $6,000 · ReligionJESUS USE …BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $4,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionHEAVENLY TREASURES: $45,395 · InternationalMISSION FLIGHT: $10,100 · International+1 more: $1,600 · InternationalAvenues Pregnancy Clinic: $12,000 · HealthCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY: $7,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $700 · HealthAxia Project: $15,024 · EducationCRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $1,000 · Education
Other$1,010,166Religion$109,000International$57,095Health$19,700Education$16,024

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI PLANTED A SEED INC: $55,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetHEAVENLY TREASURES: $45,395 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetThru The Bible Inc: $26,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAxia Project: $15,024 over 1y, 33% of budgetAvenues Pregnancy Clinic: $12,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMISSION FLIGHT: $10,100 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJESUS USE ME MOVEMENT: $6,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDevelopment Assoc International: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds I PLANTED A SEED INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAVENLY TREASURES ↗
  • Who funds Thru The Bible Inc ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds Axia Project ↗
  • Who funds Avenues Pregnancy Clinic ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD BOUND STUDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JESUS USE ME MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Development Assoc International ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Upside Down Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Upside Down Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Upside Down’s filings →

    More from the funding graph