Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Upside Down Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$184k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$568kInternational$200kEducation$30kHealth$28kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $147k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$570k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$35,000
HEAVENLY TREASURES$22,745
JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST$20,000
AXIAL PROJECT$15,024
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA$15,000
INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES$13,680
MISSION FLIGHT$10,100
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$8,000
JEWS FOR JESUS$5,000
JESUS USE ME MOVEMENT$5,000
THRU THE BIBLE$5,000
AVENUES PREGNANCY CLINIC$5,000
AADAP INC$3,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWS FOR JESUS: $6k → 10%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $30k → 12%HAVING A HOME: $5k → 6%CRYSTAL MYERS: $10k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $15k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $30k → 12%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLENMISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $25k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $55k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $14k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN: $25k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $48k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $15k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $13k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $25k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $47k → 14%I PLANTED A SEED: $10k → 11%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $13k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLENMISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $20k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $19k → 14%JASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES: $13k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN: $20k → 12%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $16k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHILD CARE MINISTRIES: $11k → 16%ROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA: $15k → 12%MISSION FLIGHT: $10k → 14%CMTA: $10k → 14%EPICENTRE CHURCH: $10k → 14%HEAVENLY TREASURES: $23k → 14%HEAVENLY TREASURES: $17k → 14%AXIAL PROJECT: $15k → 14%SERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $15k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY CENTER: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%UPWARD BOUND STUDY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OR
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Upside Down Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 45% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Upside Down Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$827k · 19 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$827k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-1%

Still filing today

47%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HEAVENLY TREASURES
    4× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +18%
  • TT
    Thru The Bible Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $21k · revenue +49%
  • AP
    Avenues Pregnancy Clinic
    3× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UB
    UPWARD BOUND STUDY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • C
    CMTA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SF
    SERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
2
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
3
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
4
Destiny Ministries International Inc

Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible

Religion
5
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
6
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
7
Christian Ministries International
8
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
9
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
10
Verticle Living Ministries

To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by

Religion
11
International Missions Support Services Inc

Minister the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Evangelize, preach and teach the Word of God and provide educational materials. Develop clean water, disaster relief, health projects, and Covid19 relief projects.

Religion
12
Global Serve International Inc

Global Serve International, Inc.'s sole purpose is to establish a church in the U.S. that supports the spread of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in remote areas of the world/Asia. Members in the United States complete extensive training in…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bible Study Fellowship and the most unlike its peers is Axia Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EPICENTRE CHURCH — $196,170 · OtherEPICENTRE CHURCHROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINA — $145,000 · OtherROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN MISSIONARIES IN CHINAJASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EAST — $95,000 · OtherJASON KERNER MISSIONARY MIDDLE EASTINTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIES — $90,280 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROBERT AND PEARL ALLEN — $45,000 · OtherROBERT AND PEARL ALLENIndividual grant recipient — $35,000 · Other+26 more — $114,136 · Other+26 moreI PLANTED A SEED INC — $55,000 · ReligionI PLANTED A…Thru The Bible Inc — $21,000 · ReligionThru The Bi…InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $8,000 · ReligionInterVarsit…JESUS USE ME MOVEMENT — $6,000 · ReligionJESUS USE M…BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $4,000 · Religion+1 more — $2,000 · ReligionHEAVENLY TREASURES — $42,895 · InternationalMISSION FLIGHT — $10,100 · International+1 more — $1,600 · InternationalAvenues Pregnancy Clinic — $9,000 · HealthCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY — $6,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $700 · HealthAxia Project — $15,024 · Education
Other$785,586Religion$96,000International$54,595Health$15,700Education$15,024

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetI PLANTED A SEED INC — $55,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetHEAVENLY TREASURES — $42,895 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetThru The Bible Inc — $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAxia Project — $15,024 over 1y, 33% of budgetMISSION FLIGHT — $10,100 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetAvenues Pregnancy Clinic — $9,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJESUS USE ME MOVEMENT — $6,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDevelopment Assoc International — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC — $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds I PLANTED A SEED INC
  • Who funds HEAVENLY TREASURES
  • Who funds Thru The Bible Inc
  • Who funds Axia Project
  • Who funds MISSION FLIGHT
  • Who funds UPWARD BOUND STUDY CENTER INC
  • Who funds SERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds Avenues Pregnancy Clinic
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
  • Who funds JESUS USE ME MOVEMENT
  • Who funds CONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
  • Who funds Development Assoc International
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Upside Down Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph