Skip to content

· Private foundation

Unterman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$328kHealth$86kReligion$32kEnvironment$25kInternational$25kHuman Services$14kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$176k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUN 2 THE RESCUE$30,000
MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,000
SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION$2,000
ASPCA$1,000
ANIMAL HAVEN$1,000
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS$1,000
BIDEAWEE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
UT
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$423k · 22 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$423k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +48%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +145%
  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • MB
    MECOX BAY CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • HC
    HAVAYAH CENTRE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
2
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
3
Pet Pride of New York Inc

Pet pride of new york has been saving homeless cats and matching them with caring adopters since 1977. we operate a no-kill cat sanctuary and adoption center with an on-site veterinary medical center where we shelter and care for cats and…

Animals
4
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
5
Animal Rescue League of Boston

The animal rescue league of boston's vision is to confront animal cruelty and neglect at its root causes. through programs, services, and facilities focused on accessible animal care, public advocacy, and sustained anti-cruelty efforts...…

Animals
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Animal Wellness Foundation

Animal wellness foundation began operations focused mainly on the rescue and rehabilitation of companion animals. we have expanded our work to advance a range of animal protection priorities, but the care of companion animals has remained…

Animals
8
Pet Animal Welfare Society of Connecticut Inc

Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…

Animals
9
American Alliance for Protection of Animals Aapa Inc

American Alliance for Protection of Animals is a not for profit charity organization based in New York City, that protects animals and promotes animal welfare. We educate and spread awareness about animal cruelty and neglect and puppy…

Animals
10
Positive Tails Inc

Our Mission and VisionMission:Positive Tails is a non-profit organization founded in 2013, working in conjunction with VERG and other partner hospitals.Our mission is to improve both animal and community welfare in New York City, in three…

Animals
11
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
12
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rescue Dogs Rock Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC: $160,000 · AnimalsNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INCRESCUE DOGS ROCK INC: $52,000 · AnimalsRESCUE DOGS ROCK INCTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · AnimalsTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INCANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $11,550 · Animals+7 more: $36,000 · Animals+7 moreNY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $50,000 · OtherNY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALRUN 2 THE RESCUE: $35,000 · OtherRUN 2 THE RESCUEHAVAYAH CENTRE INC: $20,000 · OtherHAVAYAH CENTRE INCUJA: $10,000 · OtherUJALITTLE SHELTER: $9,000 · OtherLITTLE SHELTERTEMPLE SHAARAY TEFILA: $5,576 · Other+8 more: $22,375 · Other+8 moreMECOX BAY CONSERVANCY INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $25,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $6,000 · HealthPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $1,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,400 · EducationMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Animals$279,050Other$151,951Environment$25,000International$25,000Health$20,500Education$10,400Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC: $160,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetRESCUE DOGS ROCK INC: $52,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMECOX BAY CONSERVANCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $11,550 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWILD BIRD FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAlley Cat Rescue Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTED WARRIORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECLC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE DOGS ROCK INC ↗
  • Who funds MECOX BAY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILD BIRD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Alley Cat Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ECLC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Unterman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Unterman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Unterman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph