Skip to content
University of Dallas at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

University of Dallas

The University of Dallas is dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom, of truth, and of virtue as the proper and primary ends of education.

$52M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$284kHuman Services$72kHealth$53kHousing & Shelter$44kInternational$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $81,682, the rows itemized in this filing. The $51,961,601 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,879,919 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$7,345
Median grant
2
States reached
$194M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Church of the Incarnation$67,000
In My Shoes$7,345
Missionaries of Charity Inc$7,337
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%St Jude's Ranch for Children - Tex: $11k → 7%IN MY SHOES: $14k → 14%A WOMAN'S HAVEN: $10k → 16%Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $8k → 19%GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS: $10k → 16%In My Shoes: $7k → 14%DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $11k → 14%Jonathan's Place: $6k → 14%Low Birth Weight Developement Cente: $15k → 14%IN MY SHOES: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 3 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +266% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$276k
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+266%
+37%

Still filing today

33%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $229k
  • IM
    IN MY SHOES INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +266%
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k

Funded once

  • BI
    Boethius Institute for the Advancement of Liberal Educationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +31% · 40% of their budget
  • LB
    Low Birth Weight Development Center
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -39%
  • ST
    SJRC TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +101%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
2
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
3
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
4
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
5
Aggieland Pregnancy Outreach Inc

To provide support services for women facing unplanned pregnancies, to point them to Jesus Christ, and to promote adoption as a loving alternative.

Health
6
Top O Texas Crisis Pregnancy Center

None

Health
7
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
8
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
9
Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc

Pregnancy Resources' mission is to inspire hope and unconditionally love everyone we serve by empowering them to thrive through compassionate support and positive solutions.

Civil Rights
10
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
11
Pregnancy Care Center of Southeast Texas

Confidential pregnancy testing; counseling in pregnancy options; classes in prenatal care, parenting and job skills; referrals; providing baby items and clothing.

Health
12
Austin Lifecare

Austin Lifecare dba The Source exists to support, care for and equip women by providing high-quality, whole person health services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kid Net Foundation Jonathans Place; the most unlike its peers is Boethius Institute for the Advancement of Liberal Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION: $228,603 · OtherCHURCH OF THE INCARNATIONCHURCH OF THE INCARNATION: $14,358 · OtherCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC: $11,490 · OtherST CECILIA CONGREGATION: $10,000 · OtherRAYS OF LIGHT WHERE SPECIAL CHILDREN SHINE: $9,864 · Other+2 more: $14,272 · OtherIN MY SHOES INC: $32,920 · Human ServicesIN MY SHOES INCLow Birth Weight Development Center: $15,000 · Human ServicesLow Birth Weight Developm…SJRC TEXAS INC: $11,490 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INCDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $11,175 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCAC…A WOMANS HAVEN INC: $10,467 · Human ServicesA WOMANS HAVEN INCGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $9,864 · Human ServicesGuide Dogs of Texas IncCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $8,351 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Sou…KID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $6,313 · Human ServicesKID NET FOUNDATION JONATH…Abel Speaks: $11,040 · HealthScottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc: $11,040 · HealthPROJECT ULTRASOUND INC: $6,935 · HealthTexas Children's: $6,313 · HealthBoethius Institute for the Advancement of Liberal Education: $24,043 · ReligionHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $6,935 · International
Other$288,587Human Services$105,580Health$35,328Religion$24,043International$6,935

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIN MY SHOES INC: $32,920 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBoethius Institute for the Advancement of Liberal Education: $24,043 over 1y, 40% of budgetLow Birth Weight Development Center: $15,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $11,490 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC: $11,490 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $11,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAbel Speaks: $11,040 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetScottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc: $11,040 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetA WOMANS HAVEN INC: $10,467 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $9,864 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $8,351 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHROMOSOME 18 REGISTRY & RESEARCH SOCIETY: $6,935 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $6,935 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $6,313 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Shell USA Company Fou…Christus HealthGreater Houston Commu…Texas Instruments Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Christus Health · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University of Dallas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University of Dallas. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on University of Dallas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home