Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

$367k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$12MCommunity Improvement$508kEducation$168kYouth Development$45kRecreation & Sports$30kArts & Culture$10kOther$1.7M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $299,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $366,550 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $66,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$508M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECU HEALTH FOUNDATION$100,000
GREENVILLE-ENC ALLIANCE$100,000
North Carolina Professionals Health Program$34,000
Great 100 Gala$15,000
1Ofus Inc$10,000
Little League Softball$10,000
Pitt Co Arts Council$10,000
Uptown Greenville$8,000
Ronald McDonald House$7,500
Greenville CPL LLC$5,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%1Ofus Inc: $15k → 8%Public Radio East Foundation: $20k → 14%NC Eastern Economic Development Corp: $25k → 16%ECU HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100k → 20%NC Eastern Alliance: $8k → 21%American Cancer Society: $20k → 13%Democracy Collaborative Foundation: $13k → 17%1Ofus Inc: $10k → 8%NC Eastern Economic Development Corp: $25k → 16%NC Civil: $32k → 20%North Carolina Professionals Health Program: $34k → 8%American Heart Association: $20k → 20%NC Physicians ProgRams: $15k → 8%Community Industry Value Interactionist League: $13k → 20%NC Professionals Health Program: $15k → 8%Ronald Mcdonald House: $8k → 20%NC Physicians Health Program: $15k → 8%Ronald Mcdonald House: $8k → 20%NC Physicians Health Program: $15k → 8%Ronald McDonald House: $8k → 20%NC Professionals Health Program: $14k → 8%Pitt Co Arts Council: $10k → 20%NCIOM (NC Institute of Medicine): $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 11 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$14M
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-4%

Still filing today

82%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +48% · 61% of their budget
  • PC
    Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +14%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA PHYSICIANS HEALTH PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -81%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +53%
  • PR
    PUBLIC RADIO EAST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
2
Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina Inc

Our mission is to improve the economic well-being and quality of life for all north carolinians. we do this by collaborating with state, regional, local, and private-sector partners in new business recruitment, existing employer support,…

Community Improvement
3
Triangle Global Health Consortium Inc

The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…

Health
4
North Carolina Association of Pharmacists

The north carolina association of pharmacists primary purpose is to unite, serve, and advance the profession of pharmacy for the benefit of society in north carolina.

Community Improvement
5
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
6
North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc

To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.

Health
7
Carolina Common Enterprise

The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…

Community Improvement
8
Research Triangle Regional Partnership

The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…

9
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
10
North Carolina Chamber

The organization is a proactive, nonpartisan business advocacy organization. the organization works in the legislative, regulatory and political arenas to proactively drive positive change to ensure that north carolina is a leading place…

11
Advance Community Health Community Development Corporation

The community development corporation will create equitable and accessible whole-person solutions for every resident of north carolina through community collaboration and investment made possible by the community development corporation.

Human Services
12
Greenville-Pitt County Chamber of Commerce Inc

To strengthen the business environment, enhancing the quality of life, communicating the views of business and supporting constructive initiatives on major issue of public policy.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Great 100 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc — $11,681,418 · HealthUniversity Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc+5 more — $210,500 · HealthVidant Health Foundation — $1,600,000 · OtherVidant Health…UNITED WAY OF PITT COUNTY INC — $85,700 · Other+4 more — $40,750 · OtherPitt County Committee of 100 Inc — $500,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $7,500 · Community ImprovementGREAT 100 INC — $105,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINAS EASTERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · EducationTHE DEMOCRACY COLLABORATIVE FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY INDUSTRY VALUE INTERACTIONIST LEAGUE — $45,495 · Youth DevelopmentLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsEmerge Gallery Art Center Inc — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$11,891,918Other$1,726,450Community Improvement$507,500Education$167,500Youth Development$45,495Recreation & Sports$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc — $11,681,418 over 4y, 61% of budgetPitt County Committee of 100 Inc — $500,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA PHYSICIANS HEALTH PROGRAM INC — $108,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGREAT 100 INC — $105,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PITT COUNTY INC — $85,700 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNORTH CAROLINAS EASTERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INDUSTRY VALUE INTERACTIONIST LEAGUE — $45,495 over 2y, 40% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $37,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $30,000 over 3y, 26% of budget1 OF US — $25,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC RADIO EAST FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE DEMOCRACY COLLABORATIVE FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEmerge Gallery Art Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEvergreen of Greenville Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke University Health System IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke University Health System Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph