North Carolina · Nonprofit
Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc
Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc (North Carolina) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $140,357 to it, the largest being Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation ($60,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,812 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,812 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Tr Uw Vivian S West - West Memorial Fundshared fundersportfolio match
- James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of Americashared fundersportfolio match
- Mildred Sheffield Wells Char Trustshared fundersportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
87% of Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (61% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $15k → $12k.
2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $500k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc raised.
From the IRS filings of Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 67% · 2021 100% · 2022 60% · 2023 86% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc draws 52% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $15k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Tr Uw Vivian S West - West Memorial Fundshared fundersportfolio matchNC · backs 12 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of Americashared fundersportfolio matchNC · backs 12 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Mildred Sheffield Wells Char Trustshared fundersportfolio matchNC · backs 9 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio matchNC · backs 19 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- North Carolina Electric Membership Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Reidsville Area Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Nc Ideaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nc Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bell Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Outer Banks Hospital Incshared fundersNC · backs 5 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In North Carolina
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
69% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
96%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc?
- Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc (North Carolina) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $140,357 to it, the largest being Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation ($60,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $140,357 in grants to Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc?
- Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $60,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Pitt County Committee of 100 Inc find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing