Skip to content
University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb

To promote and assist in education, administration, and related services of california state university, san bernardino.

$8.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Science & Tech$2.3MEducation$1.3MPhilanthropy$364kArts & Culture$25kHealth$17k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $3,130,640, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,347,666 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,217,026 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $259k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $499k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$39,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,630,691
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$452,916
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$272,286
ONE FUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY$190,690
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$100,053
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO$74,915
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$71,740
CSU TRUSTEES$62,001
SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$45,438
UC REGENTS$39,000
BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$32,772
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$30,897
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$26,124
OHIO UNIVERSITY$25,125
SAN BERNARDINO SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $33k → 13%UC REGENTS: $39k → 10%ONE FUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $191k → 11%UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC: $12k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $364k → 14%CSU TRUSTEES: $62k → 14%MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.6M → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $26k → 22%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $72k → 15%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 9%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $31k → 22%RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $272k → 11%CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $178k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $8k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $25k → 22%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $168k → 14%KECK GRADUATE INSTITUTE: $11k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $75k → 14%CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $72k → 14%CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $52k → 14%SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $45k → 14%ASSOCIATED STUDENTS INCORPORATED CSUSB: $25k → 14%SAN BERNARDINO SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS: $20k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $22k → 14%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
NE
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
6
California State University Alumni Association

Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education
10
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
11
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
12
Samuel Merritt University

Samuel merritt university educates students to become highly skilled and compassionate health care professionals who positively transform the experience of care in diverse communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Csusb Philanthropic Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
2/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,630,691 · OtherMOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGECALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $628,645 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINORIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $272,286 · OtherRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION+7 more: $219,356 · Other+7 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $452,916 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVE…ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $190,690 · EducationONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLE…Cedarville University: $100,053 · EducationCedarville UniversityWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $71,740 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY+5 more: $73,342 · Education+5 moreCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $302,288 · PhilanthropyCSUSB PHIL…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $62,001 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA…CITY OF HOPE: $7,650 · Health
Other$2,750,978Education$888,741Philanthropy$364,289Health$7,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $452,916 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $302,288 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $272,286 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $190,690 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCedarville University: $100,053 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $71,740 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $62,001 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASSOCIATED STUDENTS CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $15,977 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC: $12,440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $8,925 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $7,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The James Irvine Foun…College Futures Found…California Community …The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The James Irvine FoundationCA17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The James Irvine Foundation · College Futures Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home