· Public charity
University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb
To promote and assist in education, administration, and related services of california state university, san bernardino.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION AT CSUSB’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $3,130,640 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,347,666 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,217,026 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $259k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $499k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $1,630,691 |
| STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $452,916 |
| RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | $272,286 |
| ONE FUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY | $190,690 |
| CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY | $100,053 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO | $74,915 |
| WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY | $71,740 |
| CSU TRUSTEES | $62,001 |
| SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | $45,438 |
| UC REGENTS | $39,000 |
| BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA | $32,772 |
| OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY | $30,897 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY | $26,124 |
| OHIO UNIVERSITY | $25,125 |
| SAN BERNARDINO SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.
Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…
Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…
Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.
Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…
Samuel merritt university educates students to become highly skilled and compassionate health care professionals who positively transform the experience of care in diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Csusb Philanthropic Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Cedarville University ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED STUDENTS CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CITY OF HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The James Irvine Foundation · College Futures Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization University Enterprises Corporation at Csusb funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology — 12% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.