Skip to content
University Area Community Development Corporation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

University Area Community Development Corporation Inc

The university area community development corporation, inc.

$257k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$3.0MHousing & Shelter$763kEducation$588kHuman Services$463kArts & Culture$403kReligion$237k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $208k
$54,529
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT$153,954
YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG$54,529
GIRLS INC OF LAKELAND$48,146
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $750k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF GREATER ST PETE: $199k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER ST PETE: $74k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER ST PETE: $70k → 12%POSITIVE SPIN: $31k → 13%YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG: $73k → 12%YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG: $65k → 12%YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG: $64k → 12%YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG: $61k → 12%YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG: $59k → 12%YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG: $55k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 11 repeat orgs$539k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$5.2M
$539k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+40%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +127%
  • ON
    ORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +358%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $719k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • SL
    SAINT LEO UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $188k · revenue -23%
  • OC
    OASIS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR OSCEOLA EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $96k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Education and Arts Trust
Philanthropy
2
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
3
Florida Classical Ballet Inc

Ballet instruction - students up to the age of 18

Arts & Culture
4
St Pete Gators

Mentor kids ages 4 to 15 years old and teach them the game of football

Arts & Culture
5
Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability Inc
Philanthropy
6
Orlando Philharmonic
—
7
Frameworks of Tampa Bay Inc

To equip every child in tampa bay with the knowledge and know-how to become kind, collaborative and capable citizens.

Youth Development
8
Florida Community Partners Inc

Provide assistance in the formation of capital to support affordable housing and other related community development initiatives in central florida.

—
9
Florida Credit Union

Income from credit union membership and from investement of member funds provide the foundation from which the organization can function and provide service to its restricted membership.

—
10
Creative Kids Srq
Arts & Culture
11
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
12
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc

As the region's leading safety net hospital, tampa general hospital is committed to providing area residents with excellent and compassionate health care ranging from the simplest to the most complex medical services. our shared purpose:…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Florida Orchestra; the most unlike its peers is The Arts Ensemble Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC: $1,272,217 · Housing & ShelterORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEME…TAMPA HOUSING FUNDING CORPORATION: $280,001 · Housing & ShelterTAMPA HOUSING FUNDING CORPORAT…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $1,296,740 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA …Heartland for Children Inc: $89,700 · Youth DevelopmentHeartland for Children IncGIRLS INCORPORATED OF LAKELAND INC: $420,038 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF LAKE…Florida Institute For Community Studies Inc: $382,220 · OtherFlorida Institute For Comm…THE ARTS ENSEMBLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $144,356 · OtherTHE ARTS ENSEMBLE EDUCATIO…POLK COUNTY PARKS & NATURAL RESOURCES: $140,435 · OtherPOLK COUNTY PARKS & NATURA…CROSSOVER COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $103,250 · OtherCROSSOVER COMMUNITY CHURCH…OASIS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $99,938 · OtherOASIS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES+1 more: $34,250 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG INC: $718,813 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHR…POSITIVE SPIN INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesTHE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA: $250,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA MUSEUM OF PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS INC: $161,967 · Arts & CultureSAINT LEO UNIVERSITY INC: $188,342 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR OSCEOLA EDUCATION INC: $96,093 · Education
Housing & Shelter$1,552,218Youth Development$1,386,440Other$1,324,487Human Services$749,813Arts & Culture$411,967Education$284,435

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $1,296,740 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC: $1,272,217 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG INC: $718,813 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF LAKELAND INC: $420,038 over 9y, 13% of budgetFlorida Institute For Community Studies Inc: $382,220 over 7y, 70% of budgetTAMPA HOUSING FUNDING CORPORATION: $280,001 over 5y, 71% of budgetTHE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA: $250,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSAINT LEO UNIVERSITY INC: $188,342 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA MUSEUM OF PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS INC: $161,967 over 3y, 23% of budgetTHE ARTS ENSEMBLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $144,356 over 4y, 22% of budgetPOSITIVE SPIN INC: $31,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Publix Super Markets …United Way Suncoast I…Suncoast Credit Union…Blue Cross Blue Shiel…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University Area Community Development Corporation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University Area Community Development Corporation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Saint Leo University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to University Area Community Development Corporation Inc?

Find your warmest path to University Area Community Development Corporation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on University Area Community Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home