Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Tri County Inc

To increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another by raising funds, connecting volunteers, strengthening agencies and teaching social responsibilities.

$673k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$630k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.4MPhilanthropy$1.1MYouth Development$565kHealth$242kPublic Safety & Disaster$198k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $250k+1 grant · $630k
$15,620
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASS 211 INC$629,817
FONDOS UNIDOS DE PUERTO RICO$15,620
AMERICAN RED CROSS DISASTER RELIEF FUND$15,061
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS$9,051
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASS 211 INC: $630k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $630k → 8%SMOC: $25k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%MASS 211 INC: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
NV
IN
PA
RI
CA
MO
DE
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 13 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$3.2M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-17%

Still filing today

85%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MASS211 INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +318%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $540k · revenue +66%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue -32%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -22%
  • RB
    Ron Burton Training Village Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Wayne County Inc

United way of wayne county is a community based organization, working in partnership with local non-profit organizations to strategically address many of our community's social issues. united way of wayne county invested in a number of…

Philanthropy
2
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
3
United Way of Greater Toledo

United way of greater toledo unites the caring power of people to improve lives.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of Charlotte County Inc

Mobilizing the power of our community to break the cycle of poverty.

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Greater Lafayette

Mission - mobilizing our community to action so all can thrive vision - for over 100 years, we have partnered with local nonprofits, businesses, community leaders, donors and volunteers to create solutions that address the most complex…

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Washington County Maryland Inc

Through strategic leadership and investments, united way of washington county, md will impact community improvement and inspire collaboration to address critical needs in education, income and health.

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Kentucky Inc

As a focused team of leaders, united way of kentucky will align resources and work to advance education, income and health.

Philanthropy
8
United Way of Greater Union County % Julienne Cherry

The mission of united way greater union county is to improve lives and build strong communities by uniting individuals and organizations with the will, passion, expertise, and resources needed to solve problems.

Philanthropy
9
United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc

The mission of the united way of south wood & adams counties, inc. is: united we change and strenghten lives by investing in our community.

Philanthropy
10
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
11
United Way of Door County Inc

United way of door county mobilizes the community to build strong, equitable, and healthy lives for everyone who lives and works in door county. we bring people together to identify local needs, align resources, and support programs that…

Philanthropy
12
United Way Quad Cities

United way qc mission is mobilizing people and resources to improve lives in our community. united way qc develops, supports and invests in the most impactful strategies and partners to strengthen education, income and health--the building…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way and the most unlike its peers is Ron Burton Training Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way FederationsChristian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Cancer Support OrganizationsYouth Development Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr14%67%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%43%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr14%45%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,323

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
16/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS211 INC — $1,398,353 · Human ServicesMASS211 INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $198,391 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapte…+2 more — $46,230 · Human ServicesUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $297,526 · PhilanthropyUnited Way Of Massachusetts Ba…UNITED WAY OF DELAWARE — $204,717 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF DELAWAREFONDOS UNIDOS DE PUERTO RICO INC & UNITED WAY PUERTO RICO — $102,457 · PhilanthropyFONDOS UNIDOS DE PUERTO RICO I…UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $89,057 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADEL…UNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $54,890 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC+17 more — $203,410 · Philanthropy+17 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC — $540,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CL…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $242,091 · HealthUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA — $44,980 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC — $32,635 · OtherRon Burton Training Village Inc — $25,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER PLYMOUTH COUNTY IN — $20,434 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATTLEBOROTAUNTON INC — $14,100 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER SEACOAST — $5,534 · OtherUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $8,390 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$1,642,974Philanthropy$952,057Youth Development$540,000Health$242,091Other$142,683Public Safety & Disaster$8,390

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMASS211 INC — $1,398,353 over 9y, 12% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC — $540,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $297,526 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $242,091 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DELAWARE — $204,717 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $198,391 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFONDOS UNIDOS DE PUERTO RICO INC & UNITED WAY PUERTO RICO — $102,457 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $89,057 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $54,890 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC — $32,635 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $26,262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC — $25,625 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $25,018 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRon Burton Training Village Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE — $21,230 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PLYMOUTH COUNTY IN — $20,434 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY — $16,379 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY INC — $15,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATTLEBOROTAUNTON INC — $14,100 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA INC — $13,344 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $10,553 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC — $8,883 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $8,390 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $7,739 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $6,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $6,662 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY — $6,401 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC — $5,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Palm Beach County Inc — $5,216 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $5,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $5,084 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideCharities Aid Foundat…AT&T FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …AbbVie FoundationSynchrony FoundationSiemer InstituteUnited Way Of Massach…Aetna Foundation IncTd Charitable Foundat…The Ayco Charitable F…
United Way WorldwideVA22× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · AT&T Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Siemer Institute · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Tri County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • MASS211 Inc — 79% of income from government
  • United Way of Delaware — 58% of income from government
  • United Way of Greater Plymouth County in — 56% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
  • United Way of Palm Beach County Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home