· Public charity
Prisma Health
Inspire health.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k59 grants · $994k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+6 grants · $29M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USC School of Medicine | $24,007,500 |
| Prisma Health-Upstate Foundation | $2,290,394 |
| Piedmont Technical College | $1,007,180 |
| Community Foundation Of Greenville | $775,000 |
| Tuomey Foundation | $412,306 |
| Well Partners Dental and Eye Health | $345,000 |
| City Of Columbia | $200,000 |
| Eau Claire Cooperative Health Center Inc | $200,000 |
| Greenville County Rec | $150,000 |
| County Of Greenville | $125,000 |
| A Child's Haven | $101,800 |
| SC Children's Theatre | $100,000 |
| Foothills Area YMCA | $100,000 |
| The Mental Illness Recovery Center Inc (MIRCI) | $90,000 |
| Greenville Chamber Of Commerce | $82,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $738k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
76 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTHE TUOMEY FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $808k · revenue +54% · 27% of their budget
- ECEAU CLAIRE COOPERATIVE HEALTH CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +0%
- SCSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE4× · 2021–2024 · $508k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2.6M · revenue +81% · 90% of their budget
- MTMIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $705k · revenue -28% · 27% of their budget
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $655k · revenue +159%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…
Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.
To initiate, advocate and empower our region to advance a prosperous business environment.
To promote business, economic development, and community development within the greater macon area.
To unify christians in south carolina by connecting commerce and community to positively impact our culture for christ.
Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.
Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.
To be the leading voice of business in coumbia county providing advocacy, promotion, and benefit solutions to its members.
Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.
The south carolina policy council was founded in 1986 as an independent, private, non-partisan research organization to promote the principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty and responsibility in the state…
Our mission is to foster economic development in underserved communities by providing capital, business services, and policy research to support small businesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upstate Sc Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hawkins Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
135 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 135 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPCOUNTRY HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDA- TION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TUOMEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds EAU CLAIRE COOPERATIVE HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREENVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Edventure Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI GREENVILLE SC ↗
- Who funds The Columbia Urban League Inc ↗
- Who funds JULIE VALENTINE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Mental Illness Recovery Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CITY CENTER PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC ↗
- Who funds SC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Junior League of Columbia Inc ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC OF PICKENS COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Prisma Health-Upstate · United Way of Greenville County Inc · The Jolley Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Leon Levine Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prisma Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.