Skip to content
United Way of the Mark Twain Area at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of the Mark Twain Area

Increasing the capacity for people to care for one another

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $204,865, the rows itemized in this filing. The $219,525 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,660 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
$16,982
Median grant
1
States reached
$565k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOUGLASS COMMUNITY CENTER$40,478
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$30,750
COYOTE HILL FOSTER CARE$21,741
HARVEST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC$17,644
NECAC$17,406
SALVATION ARMY$16,982
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$16,348
HANNIBAL FREE CLINIC$12,396
HEARTLAND RESOURCES$11,156
CHART TEEN TASK FORCE$9,216
HANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES$5,642
LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES INC$5,106
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEARTLAND RESOURCES: $11k → 14%DOUGLASS COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 12%COYOTE HILL FOSTER CARE: $22k → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $16k → 12%CHART TEEN TASK FORCE: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Action Ministries

Christian Action Ministries is a non-denominational local organization that is dedicated to providing short-term food assistance to individuals and families in Taney and Stone Counties in Missouri who are experiencing temporary crisis.

—
2
Midwest Christian Services % Deanna Scott

Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go

—
3
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition
4
Northeast Missouri Community Action Agency

The northeast missouri community action agency's mission is to assist individuals, families and communities achieve their greatest potential.

—
5
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
6
Making Opportunity Count Inc

Moc's mission is to empower families to achieve economic security by eliminating barriers and creating opportunities.

Human Services
7
Harvesting Hope Youth and Families Services

Harvesting Hope Youth and Families Services is a youth and family services program sowing seeds of hope in the community. We provide behavioral services, mentoring, and literacy support. We also provide community based training…

—
8
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
9
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
10
Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc

Community-based counseling, social services, prevention and diversionary youth services program. Provides child abuse/neglect and/or family violence crisis intervention, prevention and treatment to families & children

Human Services
11
Harford Community Action Agency Inc

Hcaa is harford county's one-stop shop for services and programs to benefit low-income individuals and families in need. hcaa provides emergency financial assistance to stabilize those in crisis and programs that help them become more…

Human Services
12
Hosea Youth Services

Help homelss and at-risk youth build and sustain a life away from the streets. HYS seeks to provide a safe place to meet the basic needs of homeless and at-risk youth and offer hope, friendship, referral services, job training and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hannibal Alliance for Youth Services; the most unlike its peers is Learning Opportunities Quality Works Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $40,478 · Human ServicesDOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INCCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries: $21,741 · Human ServicesCoyote Hill Foster Care MinistriesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $16,348 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONHeartland Resources Inc: $11,156 · Human ServicesHeartland Resources IncCHART TEEN TASK FORCE: $9,216 · Human ServicesCHART TEEN TASK FORCENORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES: $17,406 · OtherNORTH EAST COMMUNTI…THE SALVATION ARMY: $16,982 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC: $30,750 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCAC…HARVEST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $17,644 · ReligionHARVEST O…HANNIBAL FREE CLINIC: $12,396 · HealthHANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $5,642 · Public BenefitLEARNING OPPORTUNITIES QUALITY WORKS INC: $5,106 · Employment
Human Services$98,939Other$34,388Crime & Legal$30,750Religion$17,644Health$12,396Public Benefit$5,642Employment$5,106

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC: $30,750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHARVEST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $17,644 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES: $17,406 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $16,348 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHANNIBAL FREE CLINIC: $12,396 over 1y, 12% of budgetHeartland Resources Inc: $11,156 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHART TEEN TASK FORCE: $9,216 over 1y, 22% of budgetLEARNING OPPORTUNITIES QUALITY WORKS INC: $5,106 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George H Riedel Found…The Minneapolis Found…Community Foundation …Charities Aid Foundat…Edward Jones Foundati…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
George H Riedel FoundationMO24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George H Riedel Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Community Foundation of the Quincy Area · Charities Aid Foundation America · Edward Jones Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Mark Twain Area funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Mark Twain Area. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of the Mark Twain Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home