Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of the Mark Twain Area

Increasing the capacity for people to care for one another

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $204,865 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $219,525 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,660 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
$16,982
Median grant
1
States reached
$565k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOUGLASS COMMUNITY CENTER$40,478
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$30,750
COYOTE HILL FOSTER CARE$21,741
HARVEST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC$17,644
NECAC$17,406
SALVATION ARMY$16,982
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$16,348
HANNIBAL FREE CLINIC$12,396
HEARTLAND RESOURCES$11,156
CHART TEEN TASK FORCE$9,216
HANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES$5,642
LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES INC$5,106
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEARTLAND RESOURCES: $11k → 14%DOUGLASS COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 12%COYOTE HILL FOSTER CARE: $22k → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $16k → 12%CHART TEEN TASK FORCE: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Action Ministries

Christian Action Ministries is a non-denominational local organization that is dedicated to providing short-term food assistance to individuals and families in Taney and Stone Counties in Missouri who are experiencing temporary crisis.

2
Midwest Christian Services % Deanna Scott

Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go

3
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition
4
Northeast Missouri Community Action Agency

The northeast missouri community action agency's mission is to assist individuals, families and communities achieve their greatest potential.

5
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
6
Making Opportunity Count Inc

Moc's mission is to empower families to achieve economic security by eliminating barriers and creating opportunities.

Human Services
7
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
8
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
9
Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc

Community-based counseling, social services, prevention and diversionary youth services program. Provides child abuse/neglect and/or family violence crisis intervention, prevention and treatment to families & children

Human Services
10
Harford Community Action Agency Inc

Hcaa is harford county's one-stop shop for services and programs to benefit low-income individuals and families in need. hcaa provides emergency financial assistance to stabilize those in crisis and programs that help them become more…

Human Services
11
Hosea Youth Services

Help homelss and at-risk youth build and sustain a life away from the streets. HYS seeks to provide a safe place to meet the basic needs of homeless and at-risk youth and offer hope, friendship, referral services, job training and…

Human Services
12
Helping Hands Healing Hearts Ministries Inc

HHM Supports children in crisis situations who need a safe refuge assistance an intervention trauma informed care psychosocial support medical help and someone to advocate for their rights.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hannibal Alliance for Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is Learning Opportunities Quality Works Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $40,478 · Human ServicesDOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INCCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $21,741 · Human ServicesCoyote Hill Foster Care MinistriesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $16,348 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONHeartland Resources Inc — $11,156 · Human ServicesHeartland Resources IncCHART TEEN TASK FORCE — $9,216 · Human ServicesCHART TEEN TASK FORCENORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES — $17,406 · OtherNORTH EAST COMMUNTI…THE SALVATION ARMY — $16,982 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC — $30,750 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCAC…HARVEST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC — $17,644 · ReligionHARVEST O…HANNIBAL FREE CLINIC — $12,396 · HealthHANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $5,642 · Public BenefitLEARNING OPPORTUNITIES QUALITY WORKS INC — $5,106 · Employment
Human Services$98,939Other$34,388Crime & Legal$30,750Religion$17,644Health$12,396Public Benefit$5,642Employment$5,106

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC — $30,750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHARVEST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC — $17,644 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES — $17,406 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $16,348 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHANNIBAL FREE CLINIC — $12,396 over 1y, 12% of budgetHeartland Resources Inc — $11,156 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHART TEEN TASK FORCE — $9,216 over 1y, 22% of budgetLEARNING OPPORTUNITIES QUALITY WORKS INC — $5,106 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George H Riedel FoundationMO24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George H Riedel Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Community Foundation of the Quincy Area · Charities Aid Foundation America · Edward Jones Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of the Mark Twain Area funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph