Skip to content
United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc

Our mission: to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the communities in pocahontas, greenbrier, and monroe counties, west virginia.

$330k
Granted FY2022
21
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Greater Greenbrier Valley, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 17 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $236k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
17
’18
18
’19
18
’20
14
’21
20
’22
22
’23
17
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$732kPhilanthropy$448kHousing & Shelter$315kPublic Safety & Disaster$305kHealth$164kCrime & Legal$150kArts & Culture$147kEducation$139kOther$0
02FY2022 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $236,209, the rows itemized in this filing. The $330,286 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $94,077 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k7 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $177k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENBRIER VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,225
APPALACHIAN SERVICE PROJECT$15,000
MONROE COUNTY COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$15,000
FRUITS OF LABOR$12,500
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY$12,500
FAMILY REFUGE CENTER$11,000
MONROE COUNTY DAY CARE CENTER$10,500
CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING$10,000
HOSPICE CARE$10,000
POCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK$10,000
CASA ASSOCIATION$10,000
POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$10,000
BETHLEHEM FARM$10,000
THE WEST END SPORTS LEAGUE PROGRAM$9,484
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $682k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%MARVEL CENTER INC: $12k → 18%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $12k → 20%FRUITS OF LABOR: $15k → 20%MONROE COUNTY COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $18k → 15%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $12k → 20%FRUITS OF LABOR: $15k → 20%MONROE COUNTY COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $18k → 15%GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $10k → 18%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $10k → 20%GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $10k → 18%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $10k → 20%FRUITS OF LABOR: $13k → 20%MONROE COUNTY COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $15k → 15%GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $10k → 18%GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $10k → 18%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $10k → 20%MONROE COUNTY COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $13k → 15%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $10k → 20%MARVEL CENTER INC: $10k → 18%MONROE COUNTY COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $13k → 15%GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $10k → 18%POCAHONTAS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $10k → 20%ALDERSON MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION: $15k → 18%ALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $11k → 18%ALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $10k → 18%HOSPICE CARE: $16k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $15k → 18%CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER: $13k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $13k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $13k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $13k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $13k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $13k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $11k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $11k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $11k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $11k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $11k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $11k → 18%HOSPICE CARE: $10k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $10k → 18%CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 18%CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 18%CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 18%CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 18%CASA ASSOCIATION: $10k → 18%CASA ASSOCIATION: $10k → 18%CASA ASSOCIATION: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 35 repeat orgs$640k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2022, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
29

Total granted

$1.5M
$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+60%

Still filing today

66%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEmploymentHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $90k · revenue +81%
  • SC
    SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $88k · revenue +83%
  • MC
    MONROE COALITION FOR CHILDREN & FAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $77k · revenue +247%

Funded once

  • GG
    GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • AS
    APPALACHIAN SERVICE PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $120k
  • HF
    HOMES FOR WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Summers County Council on Aging Inc

Provide services to senior citizens of Summers County, West Virginia.

Human Services
3
Central Child Care of Wv

Supervision of child care providers

Human Services
4
Lewis County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Serve the senior citizens of Lewis County, WV

Human Services
5
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
6
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
7
Appalachian Childrens Center Inc

Serve abused and/or neglected children in the Gilmer County area via counseling and other social services.

Recreation & Sports
8
Laurel Valley Senior Citizens Center

Operation of three senior citizens centers with approximately 450 seniors citizens thru the Westmoreland County Area Agency on Aging.

—
9
Jefferson County Council On Aging Inc

To provide in home services, para-nursing services, nutritional meals, transportation, and other various services to the elderly of Jefferson and Berkley Counties located in WV.

Human Services
10
Buckhannon-Upshur Work Adjustment Center Inc

BUWAC is a vocational rehabilitation service provider offering job counseling, job training, work experience, and employment to people with disabilities.

Employment
11
Child Development Center of Central Wv Inc

Provide childd care services and preschool for children birth to age 12

Education
12
Family Service of Marion & Harrison Counties Inc

To provide personal care and counseling services for the development of wholesome family life

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Wv Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alderson Ministerial Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherGREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONAPPALACHIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $119,855 · OtherAPPALACHIAN SERVICE PROJECTCARNEGIE HALL INC: $63,500 · OtherCARNEGIE HALL INCCASA ASSOCIATION: $51,250 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $44,600 · OtherBethlehem Farm Inc: $41,000 · OtherMonroe Early Childhood Assoc Inc: $40,500 · OtherHOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING: $40,000 · Other+41 more: $529,074 · Other+41 moreSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY: $87,500 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENB…MONROE COALITION FOR CHILDREN & FAM: $77,000 · Human ServicesMONROE COALITION FOR CHILDREN …Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc: $74,000 · Human ServicesPocahontas County Senior Citiz…Child and Youth Advocacy Center: $68,500 · Human ServicesChild and Youth Advocacy Cente…FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $66,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INCALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE LAND TRU: $63,980 · Human ServicesALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE LAN…GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $56,500 · Human ServicesGREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON…SEED SOWER INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesSEED SOWER INCMARVEL CENTER INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesMARVEL CENTER INCCASA of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit WV Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesKANAWHA HOSPICE CARE INC: $25,500 · Human Services+4 more: $50,500 · Human Services+4 moreTHE GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY: $447,658 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER GREENBR…APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $70,000 · Community ImprovementGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $61,710 · Arts & CultureCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc: $39,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,179,779Human Services$681,980Philanthropy$447,658Housing & Shelter$90,000Community Improvement$70,000Arts & Culture$61,710Youth Development$39,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY: $447,658 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY: $87,500 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetMONROE COALITION FOR CHILDREN & FAM: $77,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetPocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc: $74,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetPOCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $70,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetChild and Youth Advocacy Center: $68,500 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $66,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE LAND TRU: $63,980 over 7y, 13% of budgetCARNEGIE HALL INC: $63,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $61,710 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetGREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $56,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSEED SOWER INC: $42,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBethlehem Farm Inc: $41,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMonroe Early Childhood Assoc Inc: $40,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetMARVEL CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetHOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc: $39,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetKANAWHA HOSPICE CARE INC: $25,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIS-STUART INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER GREENBRIER LONG-TERM RECOVERY COMMITTEE: $21,622 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $15,578 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALDERSON MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetNORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS: $15,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetGreenbrier Community School Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COALITION FOR CHILDREN & FAM ↗
  • Who funds Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc ↗
  • Who funds POCAHONTAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Child and Youth Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE LAND TRU ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds SEED SOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds Bethlehem Farm Inc ↗
  • Who funds Monroe Early Childhood Assoc Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARVEL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING ↗
  • Who funds Communities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit WV Inc ↗
  • Who funds KANAWHA HOSPICE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS-STUART INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREENBRIER LONG-TERM RECOVERY COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALDERSON MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha V…Hollowell Dawkins Fou…The Jeanne G Hamilton…Robertson Family Foun…Marie Leist Foundatio…Abner & Mildred Levin…Mary B Nickell Founda…The Daywood Foundatio…Tgkvf IncPeoples Bank Foundati…Seneca Trail Charitab…Firstenergy Foundation
The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV44.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Hollowell Dawkins Foundation Inc · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W Hamilton Jr Family Foundation Inc · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Marie Leist Foundation Inc · Abner & Mildred Levine Family Foundation Inc · Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc · The Daywood Foundationinc · Tgkvf Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Seneca Trail Charitable Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of the Greenbrier Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home