Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Daywood Foundationinc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$847k
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Arts & Culture$1.1MEducation$958kHuman Services$585kPhilanthropy$570kYouth Development$480kHealth$472kRecreation & Sports$449kFood & Nutrition$217kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $643k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
$11,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WV$70,000
DAVIS-STUART INC$50,000
GREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$48,850
CARNEGIE HALL INC$36,000
GREENBRIER VALLEY THEATRE$36,000
DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE$32,500
Individual grant recipient$30,000
WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE$30,000
UNITED WAY OF GREENBRIER VALLEY$25,000
CLAY CENTER$25,000
NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC$22,227
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON$20,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$20,000
BUCKSKIN COUNCIL #617 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$20,000
COVENANT HOUSE INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $522k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC: $25k → 20%COMFORT CASES INC: $15k → 8%NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC: $22k → 20%HEART & HAND HOUSE INC: $15k → 20%COMFORT CASES INC: $15k → 8%NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC: $13k → 20%COMFORT CASES INC: $15k → 8%HEART & HAND HOUSE INC: $10k → 20%NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC: $7k → 20%HEART & HAND HOUSE INC: $6k → 20%HEART & HAND HOUSE INC: $6k → 20%HEART & HAND HOUSE INC: $6k → 20%UNITED WAY OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $25k → 18%UNITED WAY OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $25k → 18%UNITED WAY OF GREENBRIER VALLEY: $25k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $15k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $15k → 18%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $10k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $13k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $6k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $13k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $6k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $13k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $6k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $13k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $6k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $6k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $6k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 18%PENNY PITCH: $10k → 18%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $5k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER: $10k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER: $10k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 18%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $5k → 18%PENNY PITCH: $10k → 18%PENNY PITCH: $10k → 18%PENNY PITCH: $10k → 18%PENNY PITCH: $10k → 18%PENNY PITCH: $10k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $8k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $8k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $7k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $7k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 59 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

59 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
9

Total granted

$5.1M
$106k

Still filing today

76%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GV
    GREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER
    3× · 2020–2023 · $400k · revenue +77% · 32% of their budget
  • DE
    DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $357k · revenue +13%
  • GR
    GREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $216k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HH
    HEART HAND OUTREACH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • RC
    RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COM RENEWAL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
2
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
3
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
4
West Virginia Community Voices Inc

To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.

—
5
West Virginia Homes Inc

Provide housing to low-income families.

—
6
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
7
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
8
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
9
West Virginia Rural Health Association Inc

The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…

Health
10
The Greater Greenbrier Valley
Philanthropy
11
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc

Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
12
Family Counseling Connection Inc

Nurturing the mental health and psychological well being of children, adults and families.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adaland Mansion Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr11%5%5–10yr16%14%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr23%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr11%11%5–10yr16%8%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr23%41%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
14%
199/1,459

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
30/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WV — $420,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WVGREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER — $400,000 · OtherGREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTERCARNEGIE HALL INC — $216,000 · OtherCARNEGIE HALL INCIndividual grant recipient — $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLAY CENTER — $150,000 · OtherCLAY CENTERBUCKSKIN COUNCIL #617 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $130,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherFUND FOR THE ARTS — $96,000 · Other+30 more — $897,145 · Other+30 moreDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE — $357,000 · EducationDAVIS & ELKINS CO…THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $270,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF…WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE — $180,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA WES…+1 more — $15,000 · EducationSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY — $80,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS CE…UNITED WAY OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY O…NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC — $67,187 · Human ServicesNEW VISION R…PENNY PITCH — $60,000 · Human ServicesPENNY PITCHFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUG…COMFORT CASES INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesCOMFORT CASE…HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC — $43,000 · Human ServicesHEART AND HA…DAYMARK INC — $36,000 · Human ServicesDAYMARK INCUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $31,650 · Human ServicesUNION MISSIO…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesKANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesBOB BURDETTE CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY — $216,000 · Arts & CultureGREENBRIE…GREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $81,850 · Arts & CultureGREENBRIE…CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC — $63,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTO…CHARLESTON BALLET INC — $33,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTO…WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA — $20,000 · Arts & CultureAdaland Mansion Development Inc — $18,000 · Arts & CultureAPPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureDAVIS-STUART INC — $172,000 · HealthKANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $83,500 · HealthREA OF HOPE FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $60,000 · HealthCHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC — $35,000 · HealthKANAWHA COUNTY DENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $16,200 · HealthNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 · Recreation & SportsGREENBRIER YOUTH CAMP — $21,300 · Recreation & SportsGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC — $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc — $35,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,709,145Education$822,000Human Services$578,837Arts & Culture$446,850Health$366,700Recreation & Sports$186,300Youth Development$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER — $400,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE — $357,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $270,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY — $216,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCARNEGIE HALL INC — $216,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE — $180,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIS-STUART INC — $172,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $120,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS — $96,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetMANNA MEAL INC — $87,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetKANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $83,500 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $81,850 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY — $80,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY INC — $75,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetWELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC — $70,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetNEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC — $67,187 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC — $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC — $63,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetPENNY PITCH — $60,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetREA OF HOPE FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $60,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC — $55,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC — $46,345 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCOMFORT CASES INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHEART AND HAND HOUSE INC — $43,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCROSS ROADS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $40,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetDAYMARK INC — $36,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC — $35,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc — $35,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHARLESTON BALLET INC — $33,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $31,650 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCAPITOL MARKET INC — $27,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGREENBRIER YOUTH CAMP — $21,300 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetKANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER INC — $21,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOB BURDETTE CENTER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA — $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAdaland Mansion Development Inc — $18,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetKANAWHA COUNTY DENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $16,200 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE EDUCATION ALLIANCE-BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEAST END RESOURCE CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER CHARLESTON INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION OF THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY INC — $8,700 over 3y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS-STUART INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MANNA MEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds KANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNY PITCH ↗
  • Who funds REA OF HOPE FELLOWSHIP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMFORT CASES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS ROADS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAYMARK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Communities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha V…Encova Foundation of …Truist West Virginia …The Jeanne G Hamilton…Tgkvf IncPeoples Bank Foundati…Bernard H and Blanche…Hollowell Dawkins Fou…Herscher Foundation I…HB Wehrle Foundation …Bowles Rice FoundationPallottine Foundation…
The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV74.8× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W Hamilton Jr Family Foundation Inc · Tgkvf Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · Hollowell Dawkins Foundation Inc · Herscher Foundation Inc · HB Wehrle Foundation Stephen D Wehrle TTEE · Bowles Rice Foundation · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Daywood Foundationinc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Comfort Cases Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Daywood Foundationinc?

Find your warmest path to The Daywood Foundationinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines