How much did Marie Leist Foundation Inc grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of Marie Leist Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

childrens

2020

—

2021

—

2022

prevention

2023

equipment

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $29k
$10k–50k1 grant · $16k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$974k

Total assets

Largest grants

City of Ronceverte$15,880
Davis Elkins College$6,500
New River Community Tech College$4,500
Gateway Industries$3,500
Ronceverte Presbyterian Church$3,000
Shepherds Ctr of Greenbrier Valley$2,500
Family Refuge Center$2,000
Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids$2,000
Ronceverte Public Library$1,750
Ronceverte Lions Club$1,025
The Real WV$1,000
Greenbrier Valley Aquatic Center$1,000
Ronceverte Raiders Youth Football$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 19%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$378k · 17 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$378k

$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+24%

Still filing today

35%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RD
Ronceverte Development Corporation
4× · 2019–2023 · $30k · revenue +50%
FR
Family Refuge Center
6× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue +94%
CH
Carnegie Hall Inc
4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +28%

Funded once

NR
New River Comm Tech College
one grant, 2017 · $3k
MS
Main Street Ronceverte
one grant, 2017 · $3k
DS
Davis Stuart Inc
one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Gateway Industries of Eldon Inc

A facility conducted for the purpose of carrying out a program of rehabilitation for individuals whose earning capacity is impaired by physical or mental deficiency and cannot compete in traditional work environments.

Employment

Green Acres Regional Center Inc

Provide Skill Development to assist intellectually disabled adults

Human Services

Reynolds County Sheltered Workshop

Employ handicapped persons. the workshop provides productive employment fortrainable mentally and physically handicapped individuals

Human Services

Gateway Domestic Violence Center Inc

To provide housing and support to survivors of domestic violence in hall county.

Human Services

The Gentry House Inc

The gentry house, inc. is an emergency transitional homeless shelter to help families with children in the region of murray and calloway county, ky. residents are given rent and utility assistance.

—

Riverview Community Center Inc

Provide needed community services including meeting rooms, low cost thrift items, and access to ged computer classes.

Community Improvement

Opportunity House of Greene County Inc

Homeless shelter that provides temporary lodging and food to homeless and/or abused men, women and children. Job training and aquisition skills are also provided.

Human Services

Goodwill Industries of Northeastern Pennsylvania Inc

To provide employment opportunities, education, training, socialization, and housing for persons with disabilities, seniors or other individuals with other needs to develop skills that enhance their lives.

—

Green Oaks Center

The center achieves day and employment services, personal living and residential support and family support for the mentally challenged citizens of colquitt and worth counties of georgia.

Human Services

Green Gables Haven

To provide a temporary secure nurturing enviroment and support to enable victims of domestic violence in barry county to make appropriate life altering changes.

Human Services

Gibson County Area Rehabilitation

Rehabilitative services for mentally, physically, and emotionally handicapped individuals. services include sheltered workshops, group homes, and various educational, vocational, and health services.

Human Services

Rogers Home Inc

Rehanbilitation of individuals with substance abuse issues. to offer shelter and coaching through the rehabilitaiton process.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Hall Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ronceverte Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/12

Grantees still filing

8/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$331,039Human Services$30,500Employment$24,000Community Improvement$6,000Arts & Culture$3,500Health$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hollowell Dawkins Foundation IncWV24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hollowell Dawkins Foundation Inc · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W · United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · The Daywood Foundationinc · Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc · The Louise R Lester Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Marie Leist Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Ronceverte Development Corporation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 900161831 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Ronceverte Development Corporation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Marie Leist Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marie Leist Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Marie Leist Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marie Leist Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

Marie Leist Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marie Leist Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph