· Public charity
United Way of Summit and Medina
United way of summit & medina works to transform our community to make it easier for people to get help and build fulfilling, healthy lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k9 grants · $263k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $845k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUMMIT EDUCATION INITIATIVE | $200,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MEDINA COUNTY | $180,000 |
| THE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $140,000 |
| JOBS FOR OHIO GRADUATES | $100,000 |
| ACCESS INC | $100,000 |
| YOUTH SUCCESS SUMMIT | $75,000 |
| LOVE AKRON INC | $50,000 |
| FEEDING MEDINA COUNTY | $45,000 |
| LEADERSHIP AKRON | $40,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC | $35,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION | $35,000 |
| AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE | $25,000 |
| AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| GREATER AKRON CHAMBER | $25,000 |
| STEWARTS CARING PLACE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $10.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
168 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 154 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SESUMMIT EDUCATION INITIATIVE9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +25%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AKRON INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +7%
- ACAKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +55%
Funded once
- ACAKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBANone grant, 2022 · $146k
- SHSumma Healthone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +22%
- CDCOMMUNITY DRUG BOARD INC DBA CHCone grant, 2023 · $110k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Connect resources to important community needs. the organization focuses on the most important human service needs facing the community and uses a variety of methods to communicate with community members in order to priortize the issues…
United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.
The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
Improving people's lives in licking county, ohio by raising, prioritizing, awarding and monitoring funds allocated to programs that demonstrate success in the areas of education, income, health, and basic needs.
The orrville united way improves lives by unitiing people and resources to advance the common good in orrville, dalton and marshallville in eastern wayne county ohio. our goal is to create long-lasting changes that prevent future problems…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Collings Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
205 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 205 of the 256 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUMMIT EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AKRON INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD GUIDANCE & FAMILY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING FOR TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREENLEAF FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT GRAD AKRON ↗
- Who funds CONXUSNEO ↗
- Who funds ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI COUNTY JOBS FOR OHIO'S GRADUATES ↗
- Who funds INFO LINE INC ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN VISION ↗
- Who funds AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP AKRON ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds THE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Akros Middle School ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS WITH A GOAL ↗
- Who funds LEGACY III INC ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Stark County ↗
- Who funds SOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON ↗
- Who funds VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING MEDINA COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Gar Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · Firstenergy Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · W Paul Mills & Thora J Mills Memorial · Lehner Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Summit and Medina funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Northern New Jersey Inc — 3% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.